Paul Ohm

Posted at precisely the same minute as yours: bsky.app/profile/paul...

I'm not enough of a 1st Amendment scholar to weigh in so early on Paxton, but because Reno v. ACLU was decided at the end of my 1L year and first sparked my interest in internet law, it seems fitting to mark the day that the court held that Reno's "Internet" is no longer today's internet.

I concluded: "But as one who has long argued that the data surveillance activities of private social media companies create significant and meaningful risks of concrete harm, I'm adding this to Carpenter/Riley/Jones as proof that a supermajority of the current court agrees!"

A good moment to post for the first time. As I just said on a listserv: Tiktok "is the most pro-data-privacy/pro-data-protection opinion the Supreme Court has ever issued! Now given the track record, maybe that's not saying a lot. And given the unusual context, who knows what can be made of this?"