Is the idea of an MLAT inherently designed to enable consequence free subversion of basic human rights?

Is a peanut butter and jelly sandwich improved or worsened by the addition of chocolate chips and marshmallows?

That's what I'm asking. Is it possible that the general populace of a place, even if technically unorganized, can constitute such an organization?

Keeping with your analogy: Was it reasonable for European Jews to assume that any German was a danger, without first ascertaining party affiliations?

I'm not sure that this holds for either side. If someone is a turn of the century anti-semetic German, are they a Nazi whether or not they are technically an NSDAP member?

To be clear, I don't support censorship of anything but the obvious: I'm trying to work out whether or not the analogy works.

I might be wrong, but aren't hospitals in the US constantly subject to successful ransomware attacks and other data beaches?

I've been doing an hour a day on my journey towards game development. It seems to be enough to make some progress. I think consistency and honest post practice review are critical to fast improvement.

What are you planning?

I've decided to stop being a perpetual beginner at everything I do. I've been studying programming, math, art, and history for an hour each, each day. So far I am to be improving in everything. I look forward to actually having some skills.

Personally, I don't think anyone needs to justify switching from some tool to some competing tool. People can and should use or not use whatever social media they want.