Harsh Sancheti

South Indian coffee

I’ve read some criticism of your reporting. I’d love to read your response.

@anyuse.bsky.social

Read this for the first time and thought of you!

DC. @bendreyfuss.bsky.social

@schatz.bsky.social

Interesting thread.

1. The notion that the Roberts Court (led by Roberts) was “good” on free speech was endorsed by Roberts himself in a speech.

2. Rumsfeld v FAIR is at least partial rebuttal of the fact that free speech was a consistent or animating principle.

Duh, he’s a US law prof w/a con law book to sell.

Writing in this oversaturated field requires Herculean levels of self-confidence or delusion.

To be fair, he says his is a revisionist/contrarian account and is challenging CW. I too would welcome his brief explainer, but doubt we will get it.

Have you read the book?

I haven’t, but I assume he does address the 10th amendment. Why not read and see if you find his reasoning persuasive and critique it if not.

Good answer, but without quarreling over the merits, I think you’ll have to concede that Thomas had a legitimate interpretation of Bruen in Rahimi.

If that is so, Bruen is bad b/c ambiguous and inchoate even if one stipulates that Bruen and Rahimi are both correct.

If you use quote marks, try to quote verbatim please?

either the author of Bruen is right in his understanding of the case or the Rahimi majority is.

And this is the only objective criteria you could find here. Revising a landmark case within 2 years.

Happened with Warren Ct too, plenty.

Originalism (as opposed to textualism) only speaks to some SC cases.

Of those cases, Bruen has to be one of the worst decisions b/c almost immediately partly repudiated by all but one of the Bruen majority.

The indefensible Fed only carve-out also a contender.

Trump awful.

Cersei & Jaime discover they are unrelated.

They will take a different position in the SC and pay no price.

The center cannot hold.

Name the puppies Benedict, Francis, Leo.

Calling her Everest was a mistake.

Justice Souter was a great man, and he was a decent man. And he knew which was more important.

Outstanding 1st para. Thank you for sharing.

It is the music of a people
Who will not be slaves again

Stuck in my head everyday.

He thinks it plays weak.

Yes, pretty much. New normal now.

Someone ate the grapes on the way.

He hates DC and wants to punish it.

So many of his decisions make sense through this lens.

I think they did it for free for him.

This is not the fess you think it is.
Your parents were wild.

It just happens to always be cases about catholic schools that reach this majority-catholic SC.

They have shown themselves scared of the shadow of a snake, so no.

The systemic reforms that would disempower him are reforms to take back power to Congress from the presidency.

Of what?

Preparing to move to WI.