Det lurer jeg også på.
27.02.2026 17:22 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Det lurer jeg også på.
27.02.2026 17:22 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Great piece that has this zinger: "It is basically a cosmic game of telephone where information is passed through a process that privileges the frequency of information over nearly all else."
27.02.2026 17:21 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Stack of Verso books
Just received thisstack of books from @versobooks.bsky.social. Especially excoted to read @lsiraganian.bsky.social Problem of Personhood.
26.02.2026 22:01 — 👍 9 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0Pfft, it's rogues.
25.02.2026 22:05 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0The latest in weird data-harvesting technology: Fitbit for Farts. www.flatus.info
24.02.2026 16:46 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0What if corporations gave us interactive dolls that sapped your life force and intelligence and programmed you to do their bidding, and a fandom formed around ceding yourself to the dolls and role-playing abeying yourself before them in public while chastising people who don’t want to surrender?
24.02.2026 05:29 — 👍 56 🔁 15 💬 3 📌 0Urgh.
23.02.2026 16:31 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0When will he run out of stupid shit to say?
21.02.2026 21:42 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Next to prompt injection, now we also have chatbot optimization, the new SEO.
20.02.2026 17:44 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Yes please.
20.02.2026 16:26 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Reminds me of Libya under Qadaffi and Egypt under Mubarak. Shit like this was everywhere, especially in Tripoli.
19.02.2026 23:33 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Supporters Our work is supported by a variety of foundations, charities, and individuals who share our commitment to high-quality journalism about AI (grouped by lifetime giving): $1M+ Coefficient Giving (formerly Open Philanthropy) (2023, 2024, 2025) Survival and Flourishing Fund (2024, 2025) $100k – $1M The Casey & Family Foundation (2025) EA Infrastructure Fund (2023) Future of Life Institute (2024) $10k – $100k ACX Grants (2024) AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund (2024) Cullen O'Keefe (2025) Hazel Browne (2024) Newman Family Charitable Fund (2025) Robert and Virginia Shiller Foundation (2023, 2024) We have also received donations of less than $10,000 from a variety of generous individual donors. Our donors have no editorial control over the work of Tarbell, our fellows, or our grantees. Tarbell does not accept anonymous donations greater than $10,000. For details, see the Donor relations section of our ethics and standards policies.
Dude who wrote about how "the left is missing out on AI" is on here. Do you see who they are funded by? The biggest EA funders, the longtermist institutes we've been writing about and documenting, including FLI where Muskrat is still an advisor.
19.02.2026 22:13 — 👍 64 🔁 18 💬 1 📌 1Yes, just a bit. Placed my order but thanks for the recc.
19.02.2026 22:15 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0It is very hypercritical. Right now, Klæbo has won 5 gold in this Olympics, he could win yet another (which would be a record of some sorts if I understand). But he would like not have won as many this year if Bolshunov was competing, his closest competition and rival. He's a Z guy...
19.02.2026 21:48 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Cross country. Women's cross country is not as good as it used to be. And yeah, we've also been at the top but not always dominated. Helps that Russia can't compete now for example. We had some great alpine skiers too for a while, currently have one in the Olympics but he crashed out (literally).
19.02.2026 21:23 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0With skiing, definitively and to be clear, on the men's side. Their female skiers are doing great.
19.02.2026 20:57 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0They're shit now relative to their past glories. Not sure what happened in Sweden or why we managed to stay on top for that long but heavy funding is likely one reason. The hockey thing is weird. Growing up, I think I can remember one person that played hockey; soccer and skiing more pop
19.02.2026 20:41 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0To be fair, Sweden used to be really good, the rivalry was intense even just a few years ago when Northug was a beast about a decade ago. Without strong Swedish skiers, he wouldn't have been pushed that hard.
19.02.2026 20:22 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0on the Left's supposed silence on AI: the concrete things happening at the moment conform in a pretty granular way to the picture Marx draws of technological innovation in the process of capital. the center, liberals, and the hype people all seem surprised, where no Marxist cd be
19.02.2026 17:57 — 👍 26 🔁 3 💬 4 📌 0Ended up ordering Disordered Attention, which may pair well with Investigative Aesthetics by Fuller and Weizman.
19.02.2026 19:22 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Ordered it!
19.02.2026 19:21 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Thanks for the Bishop recommendation; Disordered Attention is intriguing. We seems to share the same taste in authors as I have Srincek's and Fraser's Verso books already.
19.02.2026 18:44 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Thanks that novel seems great (based on the blurb). Will consider it.
19.02.2026 17:34 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Thanks for the suggestions. Already have Dean's book, not sure what I am missing by Jameson but he's always a great read.
19.02.2026 17:32 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Thanks but :( Makes it less likely I can make the sessions, it will just depend on the day.
19.02.2026 17:08 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Looks great. Is the 5pm start Pacific Time?
19.02.2026 16:51 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Putting together a @versobooks.bsky.social sobooks.bsky.social order consisting of @annakornbluh.bsky.social rnbluh.bsky.social 's Immediacy, Anton Jaeger's Hyperpolitics, and @lsiraganian.bsky.social .bsky.social 's The Problem of Personhood. For free shipping I need two more. Any suggestions?
19.02.2026 16:49 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 3 📌 0People are dunking on this, understandable, but I've also been that person who left a party because I wanted to get back to Stardew Valley, Apex Legends, or Marx's Capital. And jeez, 9.30pm is late.
19.02.2026 15:41 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Although a book review, @jjoque.bsky.social show how liberal-left positions that reduce AI to hype can be critiqued and engaging with the tech in depth at the same time.
18.02.2026 20:28 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0