@paperstarsorg.bsky.social
⭐ Rate and review research papers - anonymously, with academic verification. 🧠 Not artificial intelligence. Actual intelligence. 🙌 MVP done! Come explore it 🔬 Science deserves more than summaries. 👉 paperstars.org
Your Journal Club did the work. You questioned the logic. Why not rate it now?
02.02.2026 06:00 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0ChatGPT doesn’t flinch at bad methods. But you did. Leave your review on Paperstars
30.01.2026 08:01 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The system values where it’s published. You care whether it’s any good. That’s why Paperstars exists.
28.01.2026 06:00 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Your journal club already knows when a paper’s nonsense. Now there’s a way to say it…. without career risk.
26.01.2026 06:00 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0AI won’t notice if the control group’s missing. You will.
23.01.2026 09:15 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0A top journal doesn’t mean top methods. Impact Factor hides bad science too. That’s why reviews belong with the paper.
21.01.2026 06:00 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Journal clubs are the frontline of critical reading. Let’s treat them like it. Share your insight on Paperstars
19.01.2026 06:00 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0AI can fake authority. You have it. Paperstars is where real critique lives.
16.01.2026 08:01 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Citations don’t mean quality.They mean someone mentioned it.Review what actually matters over on Paperstars
14.01.2026 06:00 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Journal Club Quote: “Why did they even include this as a factor?” Real question. Real review on Paperstars
12.01.2026 06:00 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The future of science isn’t artificial. It’s accountable.
09.01.2026 09:15 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Quality doesn’t trickle down. It starts with people who care enough to question.
07.01.2026 06:00 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 1
Happy New Year! To get 2026 off to a good start, why not join the first ReproducibiliTea session of the year from 10-11:30AM (online) on Wednesday 7th? Our theme is "how to work openly?" and we'll be hearing from 3 wonderful speakers – Dr Mahesh Karnani, Dr Emma Ganley, and Dr Danny Schnitzler
05.01.2026 12:00 — 👍 5 🔁 5 💬 0 📌 0Your Journal Club already improves science. Paperstars gives it reach.
05.01.2026 06:00 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0ChatGPT can’t tell if the figures are misleading. You can.
02.01.2026 08:00 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Citations don’t measure quality. They measure visibility. Paperstars measures the work.
31.12.2025 06:00 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0If your Journal Club has ever said, “This paper is wild,” it belongs on Paperstars.
29.12.2025 06:00 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0AI sees patterns. You see problems. Keep it human.
26.12.2025 08:00 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0If the system won’t fix itself, we build something better. Start here at Paperstars
24.12.2025 06:00 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Paperstars - where Journal Clubs leave receipts. Review your last paper.
22.12.2025 06:00 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0LLMs can't judge originality, nuance, or research culture. Humans can. Paperstars is built for you.
19.12.2025 08:01 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Paperstars is where rigour meets transparency. No more gatekeeping.
17.12.2025 06:00 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Your Journal Club spotted the weak link in the methods. Let others know on Paperstars
15.12.2025 06:00 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0AI-generated reviews are confident. They’re not always correct. Paperstars is where humans call it.
12.12.2025 08:01 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Citation count doesn’t show critique. Your review on Paperstars does.
10.12.2025 06:00 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Journal clubs are the sharpest rooms in science. Make that insight visible.
08.12.2025 06:00 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0AI missed the dodgy control group. You didn’t. Your review matters.
05.12.2025 08:01 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The current system is gamed, gated, and opaque. Paperstars is built for clarity.
03.12.2025 06:00 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0“I liked the paper but the stats were a mess” Heard in a journal club. Add that to the public record and don’t let your valuable discussion just disappear!
01.12.2025 06:00 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0You don’t outsource your scientific judgement. So why let AI define the discourse?
28.11.2025 06:00 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0