Fitbaw Joe 🍀

They do what they want

Maybe next week lol 🤞🍀

Ladbrokes betting for the title

JC, sweating like a pimp with one ho here

Never been so fucking relieved to scrape a point

Well done bhoys 🍀

Their first goal was a beauty, their second a bad mistake by our defender.
We can hardly be any worse second half. Need a few changes.

They score another I'm off.
We score it's game on 🍀

Yip thought Coventry had beaten me out 👌

Happy days 🍀👌

Hope you enjoy it 👌🎥🍿

Proud of the bhoys 🍀

Need to hook Donovan after that yellow card, be just like us to go down to 10 men just when things are looking positive 🍀

If the goals start going in i'm off 😭

Murray for Scales, Sinisalo for Kasper, Saracchi for Tierney 🍀

I Saw The Devil is a brilliant serial killer movie from South Korea

Ah well

Game on! 1-0 Benfica ⚽👌

They claim he did say something but not of a racist character and was therefore misheard

That's why they are having a full investigation by an ethnics and disciplinary inspector. Innocent until proven guilty has to be the way forward not the other way around

Giving players the power to get each other banned by simply pointing a finger. Taking that power away from referees and officials. It's an absolutely preposterous stance to take.

I hope Benfica can turn things around tonight missing one of their key players, though I doubt it ⚽

You have indeed. So if Celtic are playing the huns in a Cup semi final and a hun player alleges that he was racially abused by a Celtic player, then our player gets automatically banned for the final, guilty or innocent. You support that. Fair doos, I think it's totally unjust

But in this case you think players should have that power, the power to get opposition players automatically banned based on allegations alone. Allegations that the referee nor any other officials seen or heard. And BEFORE he even gets a fair hearing

So you think it's OK to ban a player from a vital match before he even gets a hearing ? what if he is found innocent?

I think we all have to wait until the result of the investigation comes out then deal with him if found guilty

It's not about Prestianni, it's about football in general, and setting a precedent that players can be banned from vital matches if an opposition player makes allegations

Do you think players should be banned before they get a fair hearing? That makes no sense whatsoever.

To get someone banned from the return leg of a vital match. That guy V Jr has now made 20 allegations of racism since he joined R. Madrid

Players can now get other players banned from vital matches just by making allegations

Yes but I think teammates backing each others version of events is irrelevant tbh. Benfica posted their own video claiming the Madrid players couldn't possibly have heard what they claim to have heard. The guy shouldn't have been banned until he got a hearing.

That's right Stevie, exact same situation. Only difference is this guy Prestianni has been banned even before he gets a hearing. Doesn't seem right at all