Crazed Stage

I’ve had my fun though and am bored of you. I will check back in with you next time a major news event happens to see what you “discover”

It’s clear that you disagree with the frso and so want to smear it, but have nothing except the political disagreements so you phrase them as gotchas even though it’s just us participating in broad movements. It’s very bizarre. Please continue you make us look really cool. Thank you for reading FB.

What that’s not a coincidence at all lmao. You can go on the NAARPR website and see the groups that make up NAARPR and it obviously includes frso. Keep digging though you’re discovering secrets and things we don’t want people to know (so we put them on the website)

Literally FRSO’s rules don’t allow membership in a different dem cent group and we should assume neither do the rules of this DSA caucus. There’s probably zero overlap.

I would say stuff to correct you but then you might stop and stop being so funny. You should really dive in and make this your thing. People will really be interested and you will really solve a big problem. You’re really onto something. Buy a corkboard and string.

Btw party building work should be placed in the context of the 3 objectives of communists:
1. To win all that can be won while confusing, dividing, and harming the enemy
2. Raising level of consciousness struggle and organization in immediate struggle
3. Win active people to ML

Freedom Road didn’t do whatever this is. FRSO allows members to join DSA if they want but put zero (0) effort into organizing them within that formation. FRSO encourages DSA people to work alongside FRSO in the social movements/orgs or in labor unions and to join FRSO not another dem cent group.

Jesus worked in Salinas CAs fields for 14 years. He's skillfully removing lettuce plants so the plants do not grow too close together and they grow large. It takes a lot of experience to know which plants to leave. Walking the fields all day long makes him very tired. #WeFeedYou

The correct line on the election was to build broad mass political orgs. Reds could advocate these movements take electoral positions if it’s sensible according to 4 criteria. (And did in local elections). Groups that did this struck blows, raised consciousness, and built the red org

Currently there are almost no Marxists in the USA the job of uniting them is important but is not the key to party building. We need to fight, raise the level of consciousness, and in doing so create and recruit new socialists in the struggle.

Currently there are three main currents of socialism in the USA
1. ML - which follows the strategy above
2. social democracy
3. Trotskyism/protest clique
What are the errors of social democrats and protest cliques in this schema?

In the context of the recent election the social democrats went all out for Harris which did nothing to harm the enemy, raise consciousness or build red org. The trots-protest cliques ran third party protest campaigns or paraded impotently and separately from the mass movements

The Trotskyist formations and protest cliques isolate themselves from the masses by insisting all the actions be taken through the red org and not fusing with the mass movements at all.

Social democrats largely do recognize the need for a party (we need one so bad). They make the error in their party building by effectively dissolving the red organization and the goals of ML into mass work or opportunistically into bourgeois politics

Currently there are three main currents of socialism in the USA
1. ML - which follows the strategy above
2. social democracy
3. Trotskyism/protest clique
What are the errors of social democrats and protest cliques in this schema?

This is not to say that it doesn’t matter which red org you join either, it matters a lot. FRSO is the one you should join to fight back from within the mass movements while recruiting the advanced to ML (eventually refounding the communist party).

While it is wrong for the red groups to try to merge the tiny splinters which are largely irrelevant. A similar wrong idea of party building is that red organizations should dissolve themselves into mass orgs instead of eachother. All three tasks need red org

Currently there are almost no Marxists in the USA the job of uniting them is important but is not the key to party building. We need to fight, raise the level of consciousness, and in doing so create and recruit new socialists in the struggle.

3. Politically active people (the advanced) doers & thinkers not randos and do nothings, need to be the focus of recruiting to ML as a science and as members of the red organizations. They are in the people’s movements what are their felt needs? Be good at ML & show them its uses

2. We need to fuse with the mass movements by building up in an ORGANIZED way ORGANIZATIONS of the masses not front groups and not just happening to be in a union or elect progressives. Organized groups of cadre must fuse into mass orgs to fight for the felt needs of the masses.

1. Leaving wins on the table because of sectarianism and do nothingness (synonyms for fear) is terrible. At the same time we have to fight back and land actual blows on the enemy or we will fall behind and tail the masses (who are proud and want to stand up).

Btw party building work should be placed in the context of the 3 objectives of communists:
1. To win all that can be won while confusing, dividing, and harming the enemy
2. Raising level of consciousness struggle and organization in immediate struggle
3. Win active people to ML

Huge w

Originally founded as an extension of the campaign to free Angela Davis, the National Alliance is Both a membership organization with its own members organized into chapters like PAARPR and an alliance of dozens of progressive groups.

New shirt for the Philadelphia Alliance Against Racist and Political Repression (PAARPR).

We fight police crimes, prison profiteering, and for political prisoners.