Ed Gerstner 印格致's Avatar

Ed Gerstner 印格致

@silentypewriter.bsky.social

Director of Research Environment Alliances, Springer Nature ― Open Science advocate ― Zhongguo tong. orcid.org/0000-0003-0369-0767

319 Followers  |  447 Following  |  41 Posts  |  Joined: 02.09.2024  |  2.3678

Latest posts by silentypewriter.bsky.social on Bluesky

Preview
Turns out the 20mph limit was great idea! Two years on from the controversial policy, it's becoming increasingly clear that the doubters were wrong

Great piece on the Welsh government’s 20mph policy by @willhaycardiff.bsky.social

“What is great about evidence based policy is that it has a wonderful habit of working”

Inspiration for England as DfT work on the promised road safety strategy.

03.08.2025 06:45 — 👍 199    🔁 71    💬 12    📌 7

Also, Young Frankenstein. Only exists on DVD.

31.07.2025 22:15 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

"Boomers bought houses at a time when saving a couple of pounds per day taking a packed lunch to work would give you a house deposit in eight years. For a millennial this would take two centuries."

29.07.2025 14:38 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

That's a nice piece. And feels just as relevant to the UK as the US. Though the point about the absurdness of US bureaucracy makes for less headroom in the UK case.

15.07.2025 22:10 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Metascience 2025 Conference A global gathering for knowledge sharing, community building, and opportunities to define a roadmap of research and intervention priorities to accelerate science.

Bracing myself for an intense but stimulating few days next week. A year in the planning at @rorinstitute.bsky.social but now it’s almost here! metascience.info

26.06.2025 16:26 — 👍 12    🔁 2    💬 0    📌 1

That's awesome. Full disclosure, the design is a refinement of a t-shirt first written by @mbeisen.bsky.social

12.06.2025 07:36 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

When people claim that peer review is irreparably broken, the development of the COVID vaccine is the counterexample I offer.

06.06.2025 10:13 — 👍 2    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0

Well worth a look. As I explain in my book Serving The Reich, there was very little resistance to these measures from the physicists, even in the early days. Most kept their heads down. As Chanda says, none left Germany unless they had "non-Aryan" hanging over them.

31.05.2025 13:20 — 👍 47    🔁 19    💬 2    📌 0
White paper: Surveying the provision of research integrity training around the world Springer Nature surveyed a total of 7,871 researchers in Australia (993), the UK (1,078), the USA (1,962), India (659), Japan (1,190), China (1,008), and Brazil (981), to explore understanding of rese...

Springer Nature reported its international web survey on research integrity. Congratulations! @silentypewriter.bsky.social In Japan, many researchers recognize that "avoiding research misconduct" is research integrity. We should update our thoughts. figshare.com/articles/onl...

30.05.2025 03:32 — 👍 1    🔁 3    💬 1    📌 0

The main argument I've read appears to be that we need bioethanol to produce CO2 as a byproduct. But if it's cheaper to buy bioethanol from elsewhere, then CO2 is the product, and bioethanol is the byproduct.

28.05.2025 15:36 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

It seems to me that if we believe in free trade, we should believe in free trade. That's not to say that there might not be nationally strategic reasons to protect domestic bioethanol production, but I'd be interested to hear them.

28.05.2025 15:36 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Video thumbnail

Here’s what a Labour government at its best can achieve - share to spread the word and ask for more.

#TrueLabour

22.05.2025 22:15 — 👍 22    🔁 6    💬 4    📌 0

Xi Jinping cannot possibly believe his luck. I think I need to brush up on my Mandarin.

03.05.2025 12:00 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Huh! I feel utterly disabused.

02.05.2025 16:07 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
The image is a promotional banner for 'The State of Open Data 2025' survey. It features the logos of Springer Nature, Digital Science, and Figshare at the top. Below the logos, there are aerial photographs of winding roads through different landscapes: one with autumn foliage, one with snow-covered trees, and one with lush green forest. The text on the banner reads 'The State of Open Data 2025 Survey now open.'

The image is a promotional banner for 'The State of Open Data 2025' survey. It features the logos of Springer Nature, Digital Science, and Figshare at the top. Below the logos, there are aerial photographs of winding roads through different landscapes: one with autumn foliage, one with snow-covered trees, and one with lush green forest. The text on the banner reads 'The State of Open Data 2025 Survey now open.'

🚀 The 2025 #StateOfOpenData survey is live! 🌐 Researchers worldwide, we want to hear about your experiences and challenges with data sharing. Help shape the future of #OpenScience and stand a chance to win 1 of 5 $100 gift cards! Participate today: go.sn.pub/024jk6
@figshare.com @digital-science.com

02.05.2025 07:09 — 👍 12    🔁 12    💬 0    📌 2

Love this!

28.04.2025 11:07 — 👍 2    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0

Not quite. You only need a fraction of those saying they'd be better off working in a factory to actually work in a factory for the US to become an industrial powerhouse. And you don't need to be one of the putative new factory workers to grasp that. bsky.app/profile/sund...

14.04.2025 09:38 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Was never going to be able to compete with Numberwang!

09.04.2025 09:51 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

"If traditional computers are precision machines that struggle with fuzziness, LLMs are the inverse: fuzzy machines that struggle with precision."

💯! And crucial to deciding when LLMs should and shouldn't be used.

05.03.2025 15:28 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Suella's refusal to accept the consensus of the English that being English has nothing to do with race is at least consistent with her assertion that she isn't herself English.

27.02.2025 10:07 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Come together, right now The chaos, conflicting information, firings, and hurtful rhetoric of the Trump administration’s approach to science over the past month are causing anxiety, grief, and concern for the scientific commu...

Great minds… within 24 hrs both us at @nature.com and @science.org make similar appeals to the research community. And @holdenthorp.bsky.social and I didn’t even exchange notes about it ;-)
🧪

www.nature.com/articles/d41...

www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...

25.02.2025 19:51 — 👍 53    🔁 25    💬 1    📌 1
Post image

3 years from when russia invaded Ukraine. When the USA told the leader of the free world President Zelensky to leave, and he replied "I don't need a ride. I need ammunition".

This is the first slide of every talk I gave in the last 3 years. This thread is about (quantum) science in Ukraine. 🧵

24.02.2025 09:19 — 👍 22    🔁 5    💬 1    📌 0

Every talk that I've ever given on writing — and I've given MANY — has begun with Tim Radford's first rule of writing to think of the reader. “This is because, although you — an employee, an apostle or an apologist — may feel compelled to write, nobody has ever felt obliged to read.”

14.02.2025 12:37 — 👍 22    🔁 10    💬 0    📌 0
Video thumbnail

Good morning to this man, and this man only #bbcqt

14.02.2025 08:04 — 👍 21785    🔁 6058    💬 529    📌 493
Preview
Good character guidance amended to block refugees from naturalisation - Free Movement There have been some important additions to pages 50 and 51 of the Good Character guidance (a comparison of the new and old versions is here) that have the

This should be changed asap.

If we give someone refugee status, it can't be right to then refuse them route to become a British Citizen. To say they can have a home in our country, but never a place in our society and be forever second class. freemovement.org.uk/good-charact...

11.02.2025 15:01 — 👍 2026    🔁 618    💬 193    📌 86
Arsenic is Life and the View From Nowhere [Note: Major second thoughts at bottom; post retitled (formerly “Cutting to the Chase on the Arsenic Circus”)] Popular Science has run what strikes me as a nicely nuanced profile on Felisa Wolfe-Simon...

www.wired.com/2011/09/cutt...

11.02.2025 15:47 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

I think @daviddobbs.bsky.social's Wired piece said it best:
"... both NASA and her mentors and former lab heads seem to have abandoned Wolfe-Simon. It appears they bought and fueled the bus; put bright lights and banners on it; cheered as Wolfe-Simon drove it ... and have now thrown her under it."

11.02.2025 15:47 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 2    📌 0

Take this #AresnicLife article with a grain of salt.

The described timeline is NOT really how it went down.

People like Rosie Redfield are obliquely called "critics."

Wolfe-Simon never says, "We made a mistake." If anything, it sounds like she STILL thinks GFAJ-1 doesn't use phosphorus.

11.02.2025 14:23 — 👍 2    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0

Indeed. And NASA weren't the only ones trying to get on the viral hyperbole bandwagon. Used to drive me nuts when we'd be meticulous about being measured and realistic in describing the research we'd publish, only to have the institution put out a PR claiming to have cured cancer.

11.02.2025 14:56 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Holden is right to recognise a greater duty of care should have been exercised by Science. But a far greater duty — to Wolfe-Simon and the public — should have been exercised by NASA from the outset.

11.02.2025 14:14 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 2    📌 0

@silentypewriter is following 20 prominent accounts