's Avatar

@mrdetermined.bsky.social

803 Followers  |  449 Following  |  3,805 Posts  |  Joined: 14.11.2024
Posts Following

Posts by (@mrdetermined.bsky.social)

Now you're being ridiculous.

01.03.2026 04:16 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

It can only be solved with voting. Thinking that crowds of people with pitchforks will do it is the height of obliviousness.

The only other thing that will help is some billionaires to fight the oligarchs.

01.03.2026 04:15 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Post image

FAIL for you. Thanks for proving that I'm right AGAIN.

28.02.2026 21:38 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Nope! You just keep showing you don't enough about the race.

28.02.2026 21:37 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Address what I said about renewable energy or just admit that I'm right.

28.02.2026 21:37 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

You keep failing at this.

We have a binary choice- either the GOP or Dems are in charge.

THAT IS THE QUESTION- what does each party do in charge?

The GOP only makes things worse- FACT.

Therefore the default choice is the Dems, who actually improve things without changing everything.

28.02.2026 21:36 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 2    📌 0

Before the ACA people couldn't get coverage on pre-existing conditions and had lifetime caps on their health care coverage.

Explain how this makes no difference in people's lives or admit that it does. Go-

28.02.2026 21:35 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

How come you didn't acknowledge the CFPB? Explain.

28.02.2026 21:34 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Preview
Elizabeth Warren, a crusader for fairness, will shape the new Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (video) - Harvard Law School President Barack Obama ’91 today announced that Harvard Law School Professor Elizabeth Warren will serve as an Assistant to the President and as a Special Adviser to the Treasury Secretary on the new ...

Actually it was the Obama WH that created the CFPB, so that's completely wrong.

hls.harvard.edu/today/elizab...

28.02.2026 21:33 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

You are acting as if there is NO DIFFERENCE between a Dem majority and a GOP one.

There are only 1000 examples of where this is not true, so make your case with SPECIFICS. Provide links.

28.02.2026 21:32 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

So you don't care about climate change and civil rights. That's why you have no credibility.

28.02.2026 21:31 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

There is no "earn my vote."

Either you are serious and understand politics or you say "earn my vote" and confirm you're not serious.

28.02.2026 21:30 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

First you explain what the Congressional minorities can do and with a corrupt SCOTUS that is backing the White House.

Please lay out what that minority can do that they haven't done.

28.02.2026 21:30 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

I am intent on winning the midterms.

You have to be serious about it. You appear to not to be.

28.02.2026 21:29 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Again, you keep showing you don't know enough about this to discuss it seriously.

28.02.2026 21:28 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

You're not talking about the same thing anymore. 🙄

28.02.2026 21:28 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

So you're saying that is the ONLY metric?

He invested in more in renewable energy than any president before him. Which Trump is reversing, as presdicted.

Please make the case where that doesn't matter- or admit that using one metric doesn't help you. Go-

28.02.2026 21:27 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Post image

Nope! Thanks for always proving that I'm right!

28.02.2026 21:26 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Totally wrong framing.

The right had more $ in 2008 but it didn't matter.

Oh wait, the Dems also had a generational candidate and there was the 2008 economic meltdown.

You're not accounting for externals.

28.02.2026 21:25 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

You keep distorting it because you can't argue me.

Dems > GOP.
Right wing money > left wing money.
Right wing propaganda media reach > actual legit media.

It's not a matter of absolutes. It's a matter of degree and difficulty which YOU ignore.

28.02.2026 21:24 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

You keep proving that you're not serious about this.

28.02.2026 21:22 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 2    📌 0

In the midterms, if the Dems take back the House that will be a check on Trump that the current GOP House is not. That can't be argued.

If the GOP maintains the majority, things will be even worse. FACT.

28.02.2026 21:21 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

There is a world of difference between "impossible" and "difficult." You're acting as if it can only be "impossible" and 'easy."

28.02.2026 21:20 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Nope! Again, you're proving that you're not serious about any of this.

Look at the Biden WH on anti-trust. The fact that you never mentioned it proves you're not serious.

28.02.2026 21:19 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Post image

Nice, but not good enough.

You HAVE to vote for the Dems to get the GOP out of office. It couldn't be simpler than that.

28.02.2026 21:19 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 2    📌 0

Yes, but the real problem is the oligarchs.

The GOP/right support the oligarchs FAR more. It's not "the same".

That means there is a significant difference between the Dems in charge and the GOP. All of you have to wake up to that.

28.02.2026 21:18 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Look it up, dude.

28.02.2026 21:16 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

You just keep proving that you're not serious about this.

28.02.2026 21:16 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 2    📌 0
Post image 28.02.2026 21:16 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Again, you're showing you don't know enough about this race to really talk about it. 🙄

28.02.2026 21:15 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0