Perfectly Harmless Effy

I see our large and overpressurized president, full of fluids as he may be, is still falling victim to the curse of the nap.

"We took the freedom of speech away. The wind kills all your birds."

Obviously not everyone is falling back on understanding Jesus's message as aimed squarely at the Jews of his day when writing sermons. But it's still a clear presence.

Talking about Jesus's message in terms of Jupiter or Magna Mater is understandably rare these days.

Well... I think that the interpretative framework is a lot more widespread than direct antisemitism specifically.

The result is that later patristic writing, coming from people totally disconnected from Jewishness, interprets Christian writing as aiming all of its rhetorical attacks squarely at Jews. And then Christianity as a whole follows along in this general vein.

Yep!

There is an argument to make that the Christian emphasis on mercy is a tactic deployed against traditional religion and its associated worldviews, especially when it comes to soteriology, but since that worldview was starting to die before Christianity was fully born, the meaning was lost quickly.

Uhhh what

a man is sweating while wearing headphones and a tie . ALT: a man is sweating while wearing headphones and a tie .

Stephen Miller:

this is one of the sweatiest and most desperate documents the the united states government has ever produced

"115 Days of Hell" would be a banger title for a low-budget trashy horror flick.

This seems like an overreaction.

I see we're blaming ChatGPT for obvious pyromaniacs being able to generate images using it.

Good lord. On brand.

"Real estate investors" are anyone who buys a house for the purpose of renting it out.

Well, I'm not thinking in terms of technical capacity to access, more in terms of who's legally authorized to access encrypted portions of the chain of custody and what they're allowed to do with the information therein.

(Not least because there are going to be some privacy concerns with some of this metadata and having regulation on who shall have access to what is going to be a safeguard there.)

It's good to know people are working on this from the technical end of things, but it really should be made a regulatory requirement to incorporate secure chain-of-custody metadata on images and video too.

Infantrydork's vision for basic:

Ignorant question: are (potential) methods to defeat it reliant on adjusting the inputs to the model or are they something which can be made intrinsic and automatic to a later model? Is this something where once the method breaks it's effectively useless going forward?

Jesus Christ. If you just let grandpa ramble he'll forget about the stupid shit he said!

If you actually wanted Newsom to sign this law you’d report this very differently

Why is all news like this now

"pahtological". Lmao.

Like, c'mon, man, you really think people are gonna answer you when you pull that shit?

What questions? The obviously rhetorical ones you sneer out?

You seem to be trying to invoke this fact for some kind of moral support. Pathetic...

"Us" again? Who are you speaking for? By what right do you do so?

Don't get mad, man, you're either appointing yourself the vox populi or you're putting on a show. I'm sure it's the latter, because the former is a delusional move.