I haven’t posted in two months but Vivziepop blocked me over this post a day ago lmao, yeah screw off darkshipper

He can’t consent, he was drunk as fuck. You watched the episode.

Same as another article you sent me, this is about a scenario in which both parties consent and agree to play out these desires as a form of recovery. However, I am discussing the nature of romanticizing these actions for the sake of humor or pornography in problematic media for public consumption.

A Case Against Showing Sexual Violence in Movies — Sexual Health Alliance Is it worth triggering viewers and trivializing sexual violence simply for the plot or “character development?” We think not. Stop showing sexual violence in film. We do not need these forceful depict...

This is about the experience of a role-play scenario in a bedroom with a consenting partner, which is irrelevant to the discussion at hand. I would instead advise you to read into articles discussing media like this: sexualhealthalliance.com/nymphomedia-...

“While consensual, non-consent literature can be a valuable therapeutic tool for some survivors, it’s essential to approach its consumption with caution and mindfulness.”

I’m also not sure what these three links are. I have so far read about five articles that disagree with what you have to say. And one of them was given to me by a proshipper.

www.hawaii.edu/PCSS/biblio/...

I’m sorry, but I think there’s a difference between having these feelings and actively sharing fictional scenarios for other people to derive pleasure from. I don’t know if you’ve told your doctor that you go onto the Internet to encourage this type of behavior.

But she just said he consented, like that was why the scene was funny. But clearly he didn’t consent, like he was forcefully dragged away in a state where it was painfully obvious he was drunk. That’s not funny. There’s no joke.

I’m here because I think you fetishize rape and you’re a danger to society by perpetuating norms that send people to commit the same crimes in real life with verifiable evidence. Here’s the piece of evidence the last proshipper tried to send me which says that:

www.hawaii.edu/PCSS/biblio/...

Look, I don’t wanna call you an idiot flat out, but again: “1) Make better pornography so that preferred role models are portrayed and more segments of society can come to appreciate or at least understand and tolerate its value.”

Like that’s actually the first conclusion of the study you sent me.

A Case Against Showing Sexual Violence in Movies — Sexual Health Alliance Is it worth triggering viewers and trivializing sexual violence simply for the plot or “character development?” We think not. Stop showing sexual violence in film. We do not need these forceful depict...

Your last source doesn’t say that. In fact, they say the exact opposite. sexualhealthalliance.com/nymphomedia-...

A Case Against Showing Sexual Violence in Movies — Sexual Health Alliance Is it worth triggering viewers and trivializing sexual violence simply for the plot or “character development?” We think not. Stop showing sexual violence in film. We do not need these forceful depict...

How do I know this? Because the article you just cited is by Stephanie McCartney, who also wrote:

sexualhealthalliance.com/nymphomedia-...

This is about relations with a consenting partner. This is also not from a psychologist, or other form of medical professional.

“Consent and negotiation are crucial in any form of kink, whether this is impact play or exploring suspension, negotiation and regular check-ins MUST regularly occur.”

This is the same argument used by pedophiles online to justify being sexually attracted to underage characters. If you understand what it represents and derive pleasure from it, how are you not contributing to the cycle of abuse?

Paraphilia - Wikipedia

“A paraphilia is an experience of recurring or intense sexual arousal to atypical objects, places, situations, fantasies, behaviors, or individuals.” Because I did not say ‘real thing.’ If you are interested in a fictional story that brings you arousal, that’s it.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paraphi...

And I’m doing a quick look through your profile, and you’re a ValAngel shipper, right? That’s a type of problematic or proship? What about that relationship is interesting to you?

Would you like to explain to me what about this joke was funny then? How it helps to cope with the trauma? Because the creator of the show just said that consenting while drunk means he deserved it.

The impact of childhood trauma, personality, and sexuality on the development of paraphilias Paraphilia can be defined as a condition in which the sexual excitement rely on fantasizing and/or participating in unusual sexual behaviour. The last…

I actually have. So to summarize, not all paraphilias are good, and in a lot cases are actually harmful, and I see this as a bad exploration of trauma. I personally don’t like it because it offends my own friends who survived SA. www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

The impact of childhood trauma, personality, and sexuality on the development of paraphilias Paraphilia can be defined as a condition in which the sexual excitement rely on fantasizing and/or participating in unusual sexual behaviour. The last…

Expressing your feelings through art is not the problem here, trivializing someone else’s trauma to jerk off with it is. Not all coping mechanisms like this are approved of and going out of your way to share these ideas is harmful. www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

No, they don’t. They cut away after he’s been dragged into a locked room. It would be a lot easier if the creator just said she let him walk out, but here she is actively confirming he got fucked.

How is this the second time I’ve been asked this. Is this like the common rage bait response? The creator just said he had sex, which means he was forced to participate in it since he was clearly intoxicated and resisting.

OK, so I think you might have missed what the creator is referencing here, but something did clearly happen. The character was forced to participate in an orgy. Viv’s even gone out of her way to like posts that reference that this character was fucked, confirming it.

If this is your form of coping mechanism, then you need a healthier form of cope. Falling back on and approving of fictional relationships that trivialize the experience you and others went through or actively encouraging other people to participate in it is unhealthy.

Was he or was he not intoxicated? And did he or did he not resist?

You animated him struggling to run away, and you know he couldn’t have consented because you made him drunk within the context of the story.

I mean, you could just apologize for some of your writing decisions. Like you had an SA survivor in your replies explaining in excruciating detail how the show’s canonization of Stolitz negatively affected them because of how it seemed like you signed off on sexual coercion.

These aren’t just things we should ignore, and it’s not enough to just not watch the show. Actively not informing other people about these things is actively allowing it to go unnoticed. that’s why it’s important to protest.

I can’t speak for everyone, but I have more problems than just with the writing of the show. Like hiring proship story board artists with dubcon fetishes, celebrating a friends suicide, engaging with and promoting the show to teenagers, telling a trans man ‘to be proud of being a woman…’

#OnThisDay April 6, 1997, "Grade School Confidential" (S08E19) first aired on the Fox network.

Dir: Susie Dietter. Wr: Rachel Pulido-Oakley. EP: @thatbilloakley.com & Josh Weinstein. #TheSimpsons

It’s not neglect, we’re talking about sexual coercion. He’s in a position of power over Blitzo because he owns the spell book he needs to run his business. That means Blitzo can’t consent to sex, because saying no would mean he can’t provide for his daughter and employees. Like Valentino over Angel.