Emi And The Desert Crow

His adult children are politically liberal according to an interview he did with the FT. (He supposedly was as well, from college until he registered as a Republican while defending Trump. Nothing like shedding your principles!)

Yeah I read it (I’ve kept my Google Alerts on for him and Jack Smith and I’m getting like 50 notifications a day on each of them recently!)

They got the names from the non-existent list I’m guessing 🤔

“This investigation identified evidence of a potential criminal offense in accordance with 33 CFR § 1.07-90. Specifically, the MBI identified conduct that may constitute a violation of 18 USC § 1115 [misconduct or neglect of ship officers].”

#OceanGate

The Marine Board of Investigation report into the Titan implosion is out!!

Guess how I’ll be spending my evening…👀

Link: media.defense.gov/2025/Aug/05/...

#OceanGate #CoastGuard

Oh shit, Todd got his very own Lincoln Project video, it's called 'Carte Blanche' on YouTube 😂

Oh yeah, 4am is not a reasonable hour 😆

You can sign up on their page to be notified of other events, I think that was the second or third one.

The person arguing with me about Jack Smith in the WaPo comment section didn’t reply after I provided the facts, but continued to make the same points to others. So I popped over to explain it all again 🤭

Home Page Protect our judicial system

There are some judges who are actively describing the current landscape via Speak Up For Justice. The last webinar is linked below and is called “Judges Break Their Silence”. Some of what they said was covered by the media if you’re not able to watch 😊

4/4

speakupforjustice.law

They’ve probably also made a calculation that they’ll do more good by hearing cases and rebuking the government’s actions through detailed written opinions with clear citations showing how the law is being violated.

3/4

If they came out with a statement, Trump’s DOJ would immediately request that they recuse from pending cases and make an official complaint (as with Boasberg). They’ve had a lifetime of keeping their counsel so as not to violate judicial ethics.

2/4

I suspect they’re staying silent for a myriad of reasons. Judges are receiving an unprecedented number of threats and their children are being doxxed. And they’ll be worrying that any comment could be seen as a bias against Trump and would affect cases they’re hearing.

1/4

Republicans Might Regret Putting Emil Bove on the Bench Even conservative judges might delay retirement rather than give Donald Trump more chances to appoint transparently partisan replacements.

Conservative federal judges are apparently postponing retirement to prevent the president from advancing patently unfit nominees like Bove.

www.theatlantic.com/politics/arc...

She was doing exactly what the Supreme Court told her to do.

I will keep going on and on about this because they’re trying to rewrite history to fit their twisted agenda.

6/6

When the case was remanded, the judge was trying to work out which acts described in the indictment represented immune conduct, which were unofficial acts taken in his personal capacity, and whether presumptive immunity could be pierced where it applied.

5/6

where the government can show that prosecution in such cases poses no “dangers of intrusion on the authority and functions of the Executive Branch.”

4/6

The immunity applies to official acts only. The court said that unofficial acts are not covered, and that presumptive immunity could be overcome for acts the president carries out that aren’t an exercise of “core constitutional powers”

3/6

MANDATE of USCA as to DONALD J. TRUMP re 179 Notice of Appeal - Interlocutory. In accordance with the Order filed on August 2, 2024, it is Ordered, on the court's own motion, that this case be remanded to the District Court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's opinion.

Er, hello - the case was *literally sent back to her for further proceedings* because, contrary to MAGA’s rewriting of history, Trump was not granted blanket immunity for everything he ever does while he’s in the White House.

2/6

and people have forgotten that after the supreme court rendered a decision, Smith and a certain other judge, continued on in violation of that.

Some idiot in the WaPo comments is trying to claim that Judge Chutkan and Jack Smith continued on with the election interference case in violation of a Supreme Court ruling.

1/6

Here’s an article from NBC, which I’ll link because it’s not the Daily Mail or the New York Post! Please see the quoted thread for details on what Cotton has claimed. They’re not serious accusations, this is just a propaganda move for the base.

www.nbcnews.com/politics/tru...

As Chief Justice Burger once wrote: “People in an open society do not demand infallibility from their institutions, but it is difficult for them to accept what they are prohibited from observing.”

It’s called transparency, MAGA might struggle with that one right now though 😆

7/7

and b) Trump and his lawyers were lying about the Special Counsel’s motivations. Unsealing the documents allowed the public to see that it wasn’t “lawfare”, it was a legitimate investigation following hundreds of hours of evidence gathering.

6/7

It seems fairly obvious to anyone with a brain that Jack Smith requested the unsealing because a) there were valid legal reasons to do so - as proved by the judge permitting it (Cotton might want to Google ‘Hubbard factors’)

5/7

and unsealed the materials supporting that brief (the judge did and again detailed her reasoning). Got any actual allegations, Cotton?

4/7

(which the judge granted because of the complexity of dealing with the issue. She detailed her reasons for allowing this in full, should Cotton wish to know what actually happened, and gave the defense an equal number of pages to respond),

3/7

Cotton is accusing Jack Smith of doing things that *Judge Chutkan* actually did! He claims that Jack set the trial date (the judge did), sped up motion practice (the judge gave the filing deadlines), submitted an oversized brief on presidential immunity

2/7

It’s the Daily Mail so I’m not linking it (the so-called stern warning was just a generic “no one is above the law” statement in an email to Tom Cotton following his contact with the office demanding an investigation). Keep looking fools, you won’t find anything!

Here’s why…(see below)

1/7

Maxwell has been moved out of Florida…

She’s now in prison in Texas?!

www.usatoday.com/story/news/p...

Google Alert: Top GOP senator demands probe into whether Jack Smith 'unlawfully' tried to influence 2024 election Fox News A Senate Republican demanded that the Justice Department investigate whether former Special Counsel Jack Smith interfered with the 2024 election.

I still have my Google Alert on for Jack Smith. I will *not* be going on to the Fox page to read this BS. Suffice to say the Senator is Tom Cotton. He wants a DOJ investigation into whether Jack Smith “interfered” with the 2024 election. Bitch, please.

“We’ve never talked about environmental exposures that may cause cancer…” Has he never heard of carcinogens?!

Good god, this is horrific. Every day there’s a new nightmare, how much longer is it going to go on?