Yes, youβre right - thatβs the issue. Itβs funny, but irritating too.
10.02.2026 18:36 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@andrewwj.bsky.social
Curious. Enjoys policy. And other subjects. Ex HMT, BoE, various other places. Based in Canada; but still close to UK
Yes, youβre right - thatβs the issue. Itβs funny, but irritating too.
10.02.2026 18:36 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Excellent article. My first thought was also of Alistair Darling, who seemed only to want to do what the right thing in the public interest was.
07.02.2026 22:19 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I thought that too. Itβs not really a Ponzi scheme. But one defence of the term: I suppose Ponzi schemes suck you into bad behaviour: your incentive (if you know whatβs going on) is to sell to an unwitting buyer. Here people were tainted by involvement, wanted others to join. But itβs not a Ponzi
07.02.2026 13:04 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0If true, thatβs a real bind: rising house prices needed to improve sentiment of older generations (who vote more); younger generations angrier. I tended to think this will all unwind with a βgreat decumulationβ of assets in 2040s or so (Charles Goodhart wrote along these lines). But inheritanceβ¦
06.02.2026 13:06 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Good point. I tend to assume the UK is in more of a bind (you canβt reverse the broken scrambled egg of Brexit). But others are still facing the post-2008/EU debt crisis/pandemic challenges of high debt, wrong capital allocation, rich older population/ unhappy younger, high house prices?
06.02.2026 12:53 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Interesting point. Maybe because itβs the FT and Guardian in the lead (and they - grateful thanks - are mostly on BlueSky)?
05.02.2026 16:46 β π 6 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Oh, donβt you startβ¦ My kids do that enough home.
05.02.2026 16:44 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Fantastic.
05.02.2026 16:38 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Interesting. I would have thought the βnational securityβ angle would mean little release of much of the info once Mandelson was Ambassador. Is that the case?
04.02.2026 14:50 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Wasnβt he an economics Nobel Prize winner? Lovely fairytale. Nonsense.
03.02.2026 16:16 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0The Glorious Coup doesnβt have quite the same ring.
03.02.2026 16:13 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Excellent article. Appalling situation the Labour leadership (Blair, Brown too) has got itself into with this.
03.02.2026 02:25 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I can see that. GB didnβt like being/feeling betrayed (e.g., his decades-long ignoring of Jonathan Powell)
03.02.2026 00:55 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Astonishingly brazen by Mandelson. Good that Alistair Darling stood up to it. He was a great person to be Chancellor. RIP.
02.02.2026 15:01 β π 9 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Itβs a rubbish version of Quantum Leapβ¦ youβre Sam Beckett and you need to help Britain to get a better version of Brexit.
31.01.2026 00:24 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Great work. Love the FT journalism.
30.01.2026 17:11 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Excellent podcast, thanks.
30.01.2026 03:50 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Great podcast, thanks. The point about Xi mentioning he liked βPalaceβ is amazing. Apparently (my Palace-mad friend tells me), they had the Chinese football captain playing for them in the 1990s.
30.01.2026 03:46 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Not a kind comment. Why would you do that? Itβs a good podcast, btw.
30.01.2026 03:43 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I reckon Wes Streeting could do popular culture well. His Traitors response to negative briefing was super.
30.01.2026 02:35 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0To be fair, TACO was coined (by @robarmstrong.bsky.social) at FT to describe a markets trading strategy, i.e., Trump chickens out when the markets tank. It still (mostly) holds true for markets, but itβs an unstable strategy (markets react - TACO - markets become complacent - Trump doesnβt TACO).
30.01.2026 02:03 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0This seems right. But it was a wider shift in UK (English) culture, so maybe little the Tories could do. Tony Blairβs Labour in the late 1990s, pro-European, struggled to change the mood. I put it down to the post-war generation not knowing the wars and seeing relative decline, rightwing papers.
30.01.2026 01:24 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Yes, completely right. So back to @josephpolitano.bsky.socialβs point on Canada: there has been an upstart populist party; and it ended up taking over the mainstream party (and becoming a broader right-wing party, ie centre-right plus populists).
29.01.2026 02:27 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Indeed, Canada has had more than one already. The Peopleβs party, and in the 1990s, the Reform Party. Maybe because it was pre-social media, it never had quite the impact of todayβs populist parties.
29.01.2026 01:32 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 2 π 01. Carney really is a generational talent. Unusually talented as a policymaker (βleading central banker of his generationβ - George Osborne)
2. Starmer is not. No criticism, few people are.
2/
Strongly agree here. Giving credible consistent guidance to markets helps lower funding costs. But surprising Reeves said this, it seems an unnecessary hostage to fortune.
21.01.2026 23:25 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Excellent interview with Mark Carney by @gideonrachman.bsky.social
21.01.2026 23:19 β π 14 π 2 π¬ 0 π 1Sorry, Mario Draghi (later Italian PM) was the first Chair for 18 months, then Carney.
20.01.2026 20:09 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Very interesting. I remember 2009-10 was the high point of global collaboration. There was a very successful G20 meeting which addressed the challenges of the crisis, the Financial Stability Board was set up by that G20 (first Chair - Mark Carneyβ¦).
20.01.2026 20:05 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0@gideonrachman.bsky.social Excellent article mapping out why Europe needs a strong response. (Itβs game theory - make a credible threat to a bullying threat). www.ft.com/content/2642... Europe must not appease Trump on Greenland
18.01.2026 16:37 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0