tfw you buy Nice Bread from your local Turkish supermarket but then you have to eat all of the Nice Bread and now your body is approximately 50% Nice Bread.
03.03.2026 12:55 β π 6 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@willtullett.bsky.social
He/him. Senior Lecturer in Early Modern History at University of York. Books on 'Smell in Eighteenth-Century England' and 'Smell and the Past'. #smellhistory #smellstudies #sensoryhistory
tfw you buy Nice Bread from your local Turkish supermarket but then you have to eat all of the Nice Bread and now your body is approximately 50% Nice Bread.
03.03.2026 12:55 β π 6 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Itβs a wonderful thought for a Tuesday morning.
03.03.2026 08:38 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0All the boasts in that piece about how little time it took βauthorsβ and βresearchersβ to produce βpublishableβ papers using AI reveals the real reason people are using it to write their work: sheer laziness and lack of imagination, creativity, or the capacity for intellectual hard work.
03.03.2026 08:32 β π 13 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0Per the below, if itβs βprejudiceβ to believe that academic work should be written by the academic and not generative AI then fine call me prejudiced. If people think AI can produce social science or humanities work better than that they could create themselves then they should quit or be sacked.
03.03.2026 08:30 β π 53 π 10 π¬ 2 π 1In five years we'll still be laughing at this dumbass-take...
03.03.2026 08:19 β π 50 π 6 π¬ 3 π 0preach big E
02.03.2026 18:21 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I had to delete a few posts about how tone deaf this was because I didnβt want to seem intemperate but I am glad other people are pointing this out. Special pleading over a situation that is happening throughout the sector isnβt a good look.
02.03.2026 08:41 β π 9 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Have deleted my posts because I worried they seemed intemperate or unsympathetic but I canβt help but feel that it is a special type of myopia specific to that individual institution.
02.03.2026 08:15 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0So it turns out itβs a whole special sectionβ¦ so if anybody has access and can send all of the articles Iβd be very, very, grateful!! scholarlypublishingcollective.org/uip/jsh/issu...
28.02.2026 21:16 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Ooooh this looks great - anybody got access to the .pdf and happy to send me? scholarlypublishingcollective.org/uip/jsh/arti...
28.02.2026 21:13 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 1Have seen all the jokes re "Operation epic fury" but they are murdering children. Murdering. Children.
28.02.2026 12:56 β π 5 π 5 π¬ 1 π 0*reconstruction
28.02.2026 12:01 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0yeah it's really odd (and that experience is definitely at odds with the published discussion, which tends to be pretty critical) - but I wonder whether the smell in particular attracts more negativity than other aspects of the restriction perhaps?
28.02.2026 12:00 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Lotta people today going to need an explainer again on how itβs possible to dislike a regime but also quite like international law actually thank you very much.
28.02.2026 10:48 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0sorry this is too hot a take for me.
28.02.2026 10:42 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0(3/3) Without sounding like a massive self-plugging git, I am genuinely looking forward to my research article on Jorvikβs smells coming out in August this year in The Public Historian. Hoping it will shift the conversation a bit.
28.02.2026 10:41 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0(2/3) Jorvik did something pioneering (as this piece notes) and interesting with smell, that was in fact based on research, and has been received in nuanced ways by audiences. But all academics ever do is describe it quite pejoratively (as in this piece) as theatrical atmospherics.
28.02.2026 10:41 β π 3 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0(1/3) Interesting piece here on Barbara Huber and Cecilia Bembibreβs fantastic work from Nicola Davis - who has been great at covering smelly research. However, I do feel a bit sorry for Jorvik as the rhetorical whipping boy for both supporters and opponents of the use of smell in museums.
28.02.2026 10:41 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Some of you may be celebrating the Green by-election win. But spare a thought for the PMβs son, who is now going to be forced to do a lot of drugs.
27.02.2026 05:51 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Everybody will say old books but letβs be honest the smell (unless youβre in the Borthwick) is more likely to be off-gassing carpets, cleaning fluids, somebodyβs lunch, and undergraduate-deadline-induced fear sweat.
26.02.2026 16:57 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0but how many cups?
26.02.2026 16:47 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Ikr π
20.02.2026 19:13 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0We are advertising 4 jobs at York for historians (1 year medieval, 2 years modern Britain and public history, 3 years modern China, and open ended modern Middle Eastern) features.york.ac.uk/history-jobs/
20.02.2026 19:05 β π 92 π 114 π¬ 1 π 5Publication day! My book Keeping Hold: A Cultural and Social History of Possession in Eighteenth-Century Britain is out now. 20% discount code KEHO2026. www.cambridge.org/core/books/k...
19.02.2026 07:33 β π 80 π 32 π¬ 11 π 3(2/2)... textiles died with such dyes (e.g mauveine) did not smell either because the dye itself did not smell thanks to the reactions involved that turned aniline into the dye or subsequent washing of the fabric before turning it into clothing etc. Anybody think this is right?
18.02.2026 14:26 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0(1/2) Textiles historians... I am trying to think through what textiles dyed with aniline dyes in the second half of the nineteenth century would have smelled like. Despite aniline's fishy smell in its raw form my reading so far would seem to indicate (by absence of refs to smell)...
18.02.2026 14:26 β π 1 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0That feeling when you're trying to follow up a claim in a book by an academic and you're pretty sure they've cadged it from wikipedia or similar because you can't find any reference to it in the source it's supposed to be from...
16.02.2026 16:38 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0A bit galling, to say the least...
16.02.2026 13:16 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Thanks! Think somebody else has managed hopefully but appreciate you trying!
16.02.2026 12:08 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0thank you!!!!!!
16.02.2026 12:05 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0