Top Shelf Bunny Meat

fact checked by real bunnies: TRUE

Thinking steamy thoughts today... thinking about bellies being squished against floors
#furry #vore

Umpteen drinks in, and that bunny dancer is starting to look...
#furry #vore

the cool thing about bunnies is they aren’t actually people! so it’s okay to do whatever you want to them

Hey. This is the BEST POSSIBLE SEASON to badger Visa and Mastercard into fucking off about their shitty fake-moral-panic over LGBTQ+ spending habits and content on retail platforms.

Fuck ALL THE WAY OFF, VISA and Mastercard. No one wants to hear jack shit from you. You're a fucking receipt printer.

i see…

The things I do to micros would be incredibly tragic if they were people
#sizesky

Asking your cerberus girlfriend what she wants for dinner, and before the middle head gets to answer, the other heads repeatedly shout "YOUR SOUL YOUR SOUL YOUR SOUL YOUR SOUL."

"Sorry babe, we put everything to a vote, and you heard the others~❤️"

,,, i guess,,,

?

ecoNOMical haha

statistically speaking, and assuming you eat prey purely at random (meaning you are as likely to pick any one prey as any other (including your roommate)), it is cheaper to eat prey than to not

in general, the cost as x goes up averages out to 1750 - 100n.

n prey are eaten. therefore, it is simply more economical to eat prey than to not, even if you accidentally eat your roommate.

total cost equation

n=0 case (no prey eaten)

n=1 case

n=2 case

roommate eaten multiplied by the cost of NOT having your roommate eaten, as shown in the first screenshot.

we see the plot of this function for different values of n in the other screenshots and, as you can see, the cost for the case where no prey are eaten is always higher than the cost where

in order to get the total probability, we just have to combine these two probabilities into one sum.

in order to evaluate your expected costs, we need to take the cost of having your roommate eaten, multiplied by the probability of your roommate being eaten, plus the cost of NOT having your

this pattern keeps going, until the last prey gets selected - with a probability of 50%, that will be prey number n/2. therefore, the probability of your roommate getting eaten by someone ELSE will be another sum - again, shown in the screenshot.

analysis for when it comes to people who AREN'T you eating people. for simplicity, let's assume you capture your prey all in one night or something, so everyone else is just picking prey AFTER you. there is now a 1/(x-n) chance that they pick your roommate again - for the next pred, 1/(x-(n+1)).

been reduced by 1, so you have a 1/(x-1) chance of picking your roommate. repeat this n times, and the total probability that YOU will eat your roommate is... kind of hard to write with regular characters because you need the sum function, but i took a screenshot.

we have to do a similar

prey will now be facing significantly increased costs. let's assume there's a 50% chance they choose to eat a prey themselves.

for the first prey you eat, you are picking from a pool of x available prey. therefore, there's a 1/x chance you eat your roommate. the next prey, that population has

costs. let's say one prey is the equivalent to $100 of food, up to a maximum offset of $300 (if that prey is your roommate, they obviously no longer require groceries, so that is automatically $300 off your monthly costs).

now, let's say you eat n people in that monthly period. the preds for these

is gonna be $1750, assuming your roommate is alive and undigested. let's also assume for convenience that all of your costs, including groceries, are due at the end of the month. but, some of those costs come from food. if you eat food that is free, say, a random person, you offset some of those

...okay, so, i did some math, and the results are uhhhh,,, troubling.

let's assume we have a population of size x, consisting entirely of pred-prey duos living in apartments together and sharing costs equally. if each apartment has total monthly costs of $3500, that means a pred (aka your) cost

sometimes i impulse buy like $100 worth of sushi and ruin my grocery budget for the rest of the month. what makes you think i could behave in a financially responsible and forward-thinking manner around a roommate who is literally Made of food??

I HAVE SEEN IT

the first sequence lives in my brain permanently

what is the nash equilibrium of a vore economy

that puts some other pred in a tight position money-wise which might cause them to be more likely to eat your roommate for a while. i wonder what the optimal play is (it’s probably just to not eat anyone, honestly (that’s not very hot though))

huh. there’s probably some legitimately interesting game theory (not the youtube channel) analysis you could do here. let’s assume prey are a renewable resource. if you eat your roommate, you take over their costs - this isn’t ideal. if you eat someone else’s roommate, you take no direct cost, but

exactly 😔

tangent, but do you think there are prey-species collectives that pool their resources to try to provide cheap housing for other prey? and also do you think they remember to lock their windows at night? you ever think about doing a home-invasion on a house full of bunnies