Hitting send after a quick and wrong autocorrect
09.03.2026 13:31 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Hitting send after a quick and wrong autocorrect
09.03.2026 13:31 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Oh also these whackadoo tycoons want a techno rapture they call the singularity so you'll be begging for an iceberg just for the water because nothing will be coming out of your taps because the attempt to make AGI god from a ginormous autocorrect program in the data center will use up all the water
09.03.2026 13:03 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Data centers are not just an iceberg it's an iceberg that hits then some anti-regulation rich dipshit implodes himself at you while a bunch of political corruption is also taking place so Titanic + Oceangate + Watergate oh also connected to The Epstein Files. Add maybe experimental nuclear reactorsπ
09.03.2026 12:58 β π 2 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0Hakeem Jeffries is a dipshit.
09.03.2026 12:40 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
Sorry that's John sipher. And that was an autocorrect mistake.
Ironically the podcast was hyping Big Autocorrect... I mean generative ai
"we are obviously not going to do that" he said
π€¦π»
I'm sorry but John siphor interviewed Anthony Vinci and the two of these intelligence experts completely pretended the flock cameras don't exist and seem completely unaware of DHS acquiring mass surveillance-capitalism marketing tracking location data collected from everyone's phones.
09.03.2026 12:30 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0It's like that part in the movie clue when they check on the bodies. 5 wars everything is fine. Would anyone like more soup or hors d'oeuvres?
09.03.2026 11:07 β π 1 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0Stop anthropomorphizing Donald Trump.
09.03.2026 09:37 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
STOP BLAMING PEOPLE WITH NO POWER FOR EVERYTHING WRONG IN THE WORLD.
I'm not just talking about racists who blame immigrants btw. I'm talking about the people still complaining about people who didn't vote in 2016 or whatever. π But all they do is sit online complaining about that a decade later.
Ok you're a troll, I ask you to listen to me, you have no idea the level of organizing and activism I'm doing, but you pivot to trying to blame me for this all.
GO TO HELL.
You can say "oh well chloe you live in backward appalachia" but hullo - that's what I'm saying. Y'all were counting on Pennsylvania. Maybe listen to us for once?
09.03.2026 09:25 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0In 2016 there were trump signs everywhere and I didn't see one Hillary sign anywhere unless you count the time I was in Allentown and from the highway I saw a 20ft wooden effigy of Hillary Clinton that had "lock her up" in 3ft tall letters.
09.03.2026 09:23 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0The on the ground battle went on from 2021 and the trump campaign was going hot for years here.
09.03.2026 09:21 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
There wasn't a large ground campaign. Not compared to what the right-wingers do here. They create community, they have constant clubs, organizations, events, it's in the churches, everywhere, it's welcoming to people.
I live in the heart of a battleground state in bright purple NE Pennsylvania.
Not enough clued in people were organizing enough in the tangible real world, creating community, getting out the vote, inspiring people with a movement. They were posting online. Demoralizing people and getting demoralized.
09.03.2026 09:15 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0This thread is specifically about voters, the people who might or might not vote, people who might or might not become "radicalized" or people who might do tangible things or just post into the void & call it activism or think someone seeing a post will "wake up" people like a religious experience.
09.03.2026 08:47 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0A person replying to this is confusing this so I'm going to clarify that this statement is talking about the liberal voters, people who hoped Donald Trump wouldn't be president, this statement is NOT about the Democratic party politicians or people with power and money in or around the party.
09.03.2026 08:43 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Both of those things can be true. You appear to be talking about "Democrats" meaning the politicians and the party etc. LIBERALS here in the U.S. refers to the regular ordinary people voters, and general public who didn't want Trump. We don't have a "Liberals" party or "liberal" politicians here.
09.03.2026 08:40 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0liberals were fooled into thinking that internet posting on social media would get people to vote
09.03.2026 07:05 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
that thread has nonsense in it
please people don't fall for this controlled opposition PR nonsense
If there are people who didn't realize this, it's more evidence that the information space is completely polluted.
09.03.2026 04:59 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I worry that it probably has placed PR nonsense about how scary-good AI is that is meant to promote AI as something so good it's scary, which is still doing advertising for a crap product that's shoddy and error prone and nobody asked for.
09.03.2026 01:42 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0The problem pre-dated the Elon Musk takeover of Twitter.
09.03.2026 00:13 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0God I hate this idea. People are not one more image of a dead baby away from radicalisation. We don't lack will, we lack any real means to act on our will because the left has ceased to be a political project and become a few thousand people trying to Post their way out of Posting.
08.03.2026 12:34 β π 1197 π 165 π¬ 26 π 29βThe liberals were outraged at Trump. But they expressed their outrage in cyberspace so it had no effect. Because the algorithms made sure that they only spoke to people who already agreed with them. Instead ironically their waves of angry messages and tweets benefitted the large corporations who ran the social media platforms. one online analyst put it simply β angry people click. It meant that the radical fury that came like waves across the internet no longer had the power to change the world. Instead it became a fuel that fed the systems of power making them ever more powerful.β Hypernormalisation 2016, Adam Curtis
I've been saying this for several years now, and of course I'm not the only one, but we always seem to bump up against people hell bent on coming up with reasons and tricky arguments to get people to stay on addictive and destructive pointless social media silos.
09.03.2026 00:10 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 2 π 1I feel like the cap discourse is simply a way people avoid talking about how disgusting it is to have a gross criminal leader receiving the bodies he sent to be killed, so the whole ceremonial thing is exposed as a grotesque farce. Until we can discuss this in something other than superficiality...
09.03.2026 00:05 β π 1 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0No ordinary people trying to get by in this shitshow cares about being taken Very Seriously. Nobody cares about that performative crap anymore. I never cared about conforming to superficial crap 30+ years ago, so I've noticed us come to the point where mostly nobody has time to care about that stuff
09.03.2026 00:02 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0MISSION ACCOMPLISHED
08.03.2026 19:23 β π 129 π 19 π¬ 3 π 1I don't trust ai to make any reliable text any error filled text is a problem π
08.03.2026 11:59 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0