khalil's Avatar

khalil

@mildpredicament.bsky.social

Why does this matter?

204 Followers  |  474 Following  |  121 Posts  |  Joined: 13.11.2024  |  2.2277

Latest posts by mildpredicament.bsky.social on Bluesky

Robinson’s 6’3, 6’7 WS. Small-ish. Boogie’s very much a “Cal guards shrug” inclusion. And honestly I dropped Braden Smith & Tahaad Pettiford a tier largely b/c of their size scaring me

12.03.2025 00:49 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Demin has a 44 EFG against the top 220 teams on barttorvik. I do not believe he will be able to score at all against NBA defenses, unfortunately, he’s a really cool player. And I would be comfortable playing every guard until Fears next to another guard

11.03.2025 10:35 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

just the Ace/McNeeley spots or something else?

10.03.2025 04:20 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Post image

It's March! Conference tournaments have started, and it's time for another board update. As always, the tiers are in order, and any feedback/questions are completely welcomed.

08.03.2025 16:07 — 👍 3    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0

what in the hell

27.02.2025 19:21 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

what makes you put xaivian lee that far ahead of javon small and bennett stirtz

27.02.2025 19:19 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Post image

Happy holidays! My gift to you all today is my first board on the 2025 NBA Draft cycle! Please give me any feedback or ask any questions you may have!

26.12.2024 20:29 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

i dont necessarily mean haaland’s the bar, i mean i need to see havertz sustain a haaland-esque for a long time to believe it’s real

14.12.2024 21:52 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

the logic *was* that the number i was remembering is a number that doesnt happen at all over larger samples and thus the overall output has to be curved down obviously new information changes things (also i would frankly like to see him do even haaland xg/shot for a bigger sample)

14.12.2024 20:51 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

maybe i’m misremembering the number i saw like something approaching .3 a few weeks ago

14.12.2024 20:47 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

i know that conceptually high xg/shot is good and indicative of those things, but i’m saying the radar from this period benefits from it being at a level higher than even he can sustain, even in this team

14.12.2024 20:46 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

right, but this includes the midfield minutes, it gets above haaland territory outside that if i am not mistaken

14.12.2024 20:43 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

he has good xg/shot his whole career, it’s higher than usual for this period

14.12.2024 20:41 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 2    📌 0

i think that ~1000 minutes of this with his history and that high of xg/shot is not at all enough to justify not signing any 1st choice attackers this summer. even if you love him, get a winger

14.12.2024 20:38 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

He ended last season on a hot finishing stretch. And this is not good enough xG+xA/90 from CF in a team this good in my opinion.

14.12.2024 20:27 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Havertz being considered the first choice striker because of a well-timed purple patch is, in itself, bad process

14.12.2024 20:17 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

(or any other individual at any other point)

14.12.2024 20:14 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

That Rice number is also an overpay honestly. And, again, the biggest issue is that in 2 years as a team attempting to challenge for 4 trophies, we have signed zero first choice attackers intentionally, and that is bad process, regardless of the ways you can talk yourself out of Osimhen in 2024

14.12.2024 20:14 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

i enjoy watching the game as it exists but the corner three is also probably too valuable from a game design standpoint

14.12.2024 20:09 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

If the squad survived Rice making that #, it can handle Osimhen. This is the player quality disagreement I referred to earlier. He’s one of the 5 best living CFs, if the options are a bad deal for Osimhen or another year of Havertz, take the bad deal. If the Sun numbers are true I retract though.

14.12.2024 20:07 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

the numbers i saw (the sun notwithstanding) were similar to what rice makes.

14.12.2024 19:59 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

this is the first time i have thought about int’l players as a way to solve the closed system problem i am so dumb

14.12.2024 19:54 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

ehhhhh you could probably move the line

14.12.2024 19:53 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

but there’s a strong positional value argument against doing that if he’s going to be the only huge swing.)

14.12.2024 19:52 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Osimhen wants, like, a mild overpay for a superstar CF. It’s an overpay, no doubt, but we have reached a point in the process where it is time to take a risk to add a superhero. And this is a paths not traveled thing too, the Rice money could have been a ton of things (not complaining about Rice

14.12.2024 19:52 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Mostly yes? Soccer’s talent concentration makes me believe incredibly strongly that you kind of have to try to squeeze every drop you can out

14.12.2024 19:42 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

This is almost certainly a player quality disagreement then I just don’t care at all what he’d make in the way I wouldn’t care what Saka makes

14.12.2024 19:38 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

I agree that we’re good enough in a vacuum and are getting unlucky, but I also think that there are genuine things to have concerns over here despite that

14.12.2024 19:36 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Even counting Kai, I dislike the idea that the attacker signings we have made as a Tier 1-ish player in the market are Havertz on accident & Trossard (and even the strongest links were guys like Mudryk and Toney)

14.12.2024 19:35 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Trossard is a reserve and Havertz was explicitly signed to play midfield

14.12.2024 19:29 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 2    📌 0

@mildpredicament is following 20 prominent accounts