Robinson’s 6’3, 6’7 WS. Small-ish. Boogie’s very much a “Cal guards shrug” inclusion. And honestly I dropped Braden Smith & Tahaad Pettiford a tier largely b/c of their size scaring me
12.03.2025 00:49 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@mildpredicament.bsky.social
Why does this matter?
Robinson’s 6’3, 6’7 WS. Small-ish. Boogie’s very much a “Cal guards shrug” inclusion. And honestly I dropped Braden Smith & Tahaad Pettiford a tier largely b/c of their size scaring me
12.03.2025 00:49 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Demin has a 44 EFG against the top 220 teams on barttorvik. I do not believe he will be able to score at all against NBA defenses, unfortunately, he’s a really cool player. And I would be comfortable playing every guard until Fears next to another guard
11.03.2025 10:35 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0just the Ace/McNeeley spots or something else?
10.03.2025 04:20 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0It's March! Conference tournaments have started, and it's time for another board update. As always, the tiers are in order, and any feedback/questions are completely welcomed.
08.03.2025 16:07 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0what in the hell
27.02.2025 19:21 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0what makes you put xaivian lee that far ahead of javon small and bennett stirtz
27.02.2025 19:19 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Happy holidays! My gift to you all today is my first board on the 2025 NBA Draft cycle! Please give me any feedback or ask any questions you may have!
26.12.2024 20:29 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0i dont necessarily mean haaland’s the bar, i mean i need to see havertz sustain a haaland-esque for a long time to believe it’s real
14.12.2024 21:52 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0the logic *was* that the number i was remembering is a number that doesnt happen at all over larger samples and thus the overall output has to be curved down obviously new information changes things (also i would frankly like to see him do even haaland xg/shot for a bigger sample)
14.12.2024 20:51 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0maybe i’m misremembering the number i saw like something approaching .3 a few weeks ago
14.12.2024 20:47 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0i know that conceptually high xg/shot is good and indicative of those things, but i’m saying the radar from this period benefits from it being at a level higher than even he can sustain, even in this team
14.12.2024 20:46 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0right, but this includes the midfield minutes, it gets above haaland territory outside that if i am not mistaken
14.12.2024 20:43 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0he has good xg/shot his whole career, it’s higher than usual for this period
14.12.2024 20:41 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0i think that ~1000 minutes of this with his history and that high of xg/shot is not at all enough to justify not signing any 1st choice attackers this summer. even if you love him, get a winger
14.12.2024 20:38 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0He ended last season on a hot finishing stretch. And this is not good enough xG+xA/90 from CF in a team this good in my opinion.
14.12.2024 20:27 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Havertz being considered the first choice striker because of a well-timed purple patch is, in itself, bad process
14.12.2024 20:17 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0(or any other individual at any other point)
14.12.2024 20:14 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0That Rice number is also an overpay honestly. And, again, the biggest issue is that in 2 years as a team attempting to challenge for 4 trophies, we have signed zero first choice attackers intentionally, and that is bad process, regardless of the ways you can talk yourself out of Osimhen in 2024
14.12.2024 20:14 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0i enjoy watching the game as it exists but the corner three is also probably too valuable from a game design standpoint
14.12.2024 20:09 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0If the squad survived Rice making that #, it can handle Osimhen. This is the player quality disagreement I referred to earlier. He’s one of the 5 best living CFs, if the options are a bad deal for Osimhen or another year of Havertz, take the bad deal. If the Sun numbers are true I retract though.
14.12.2024 20:07 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0the numbers i saw (the sun notwithstanding) were similar to what rice makes.
14.12.2024 19:59 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0this is the first time i have thought about int’l players as a way to solve the closed system problem i am so dumb
14.12.2024 19:54 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0ehhhhh you could probably move the line
14.12.2024 19:53 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0but there’s a strong positional value argument against doing that if he’s going to be the only huge swing.)
14.12.2024 19:52 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Osimhen wants, like, a mild overpay for a superstar CF. It’s an overpay, no doubt, but we have reached a point in the process where it is time to take a risk to add a superhero. And this is a paths not traveled thing too, the Rice money could have been a ton of things (not complaining about Rice
14.12.2024 19:52 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Mostly yes? Soccer’s talent concentration makes me believe incredibly strongly that you kind of have to try to squeeze every drop you can out
14.12.2024 19:42 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0This is almost certainly a player quality disagreement then I just don’t care at all what he’d make in the way I wouldn’t care what Saka makes
14.12.2024 19:38 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I agree that we’re good enough in a vacuum and are getting unlucky, but I also think that there are genuine things to have concerns over here despite that
14.12.2024 19:36 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Even counting Kai, I dislike the idea that the attacker signings we have made as a Tier 1-ish player in the market are Havertz on accident & Trossard (and even the strongest links were guys like Mudryk and Toney)
14.12.2024 19:35 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Trossard is a reserve and Havertz was explicitly signed to play midfield
14.12.2024 19:29 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0