I'm reminded that I got this wrong: the cost-sharing agreement related to BBC Monitoring, not the World Service. Similar issues though.
07.10.2025 10:32 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@timdowse.bsky.social
Consultant, after 40 years with FCO, Cabinet Office, HM Treasury. Specialties: national security, defence, geopolitical analysis.
I'm reminded that I got this wrong: the cost-sharing agreement related to BBC Monitoring, not the World Service. Similar issues though.
07.10.2025 10:32 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0The arguments over World Service funding have gone on for a quarter of a century at least. There used to be an interdepartmental cost-sharing arrangement that broke down around the year 2000 when the MOD pulled out. The BBC themselves have always refused to consider taking advertising.
04.10.2025 20:10 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 1It led to endless grief with foreign governments who regularly objected to BBC reports about them and couldn't believe HMG funded a service over which it had no editorial control.
04.10.2025 19:59 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I was wrong - it turns out to be available online (for free).
02.10.2025 15:54 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0OK, thanks. That looks like a challenge to track down!
02.10.2025 15:51 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Strongly agree about Descent to Suez - a very good (and depressing) read. I haven't read Eveland.
01.10.2025 20:23 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I recently looked at Scott Lucasβ collection of documents βBritain and Suez: The Lionβs Last Roarβ. I like the way he uses US papers as well as British ones.
Is there a good account from official records of the French side of the story? Iβm not aware of one.
Iβve not read that one, for precisely that reason!
For a straight military history there is an old Ian Allan volume by Robert Jackson, available on eBay. I guess it may be overtaken these days.
Keith Kyleβs magnum opus βSuezβ is another. If you want something more specialised, I found βWhitehall and the Suez Crisisβ (Routledge, 2000) interesting. Itβs a ridiculous price new, but used copies seem readily available.
Also Scott Lucasβ βDivided We Standβ, focusing on UK/US aspects.
Exactly.
01.10.2025 12:38 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Interested to see how SCOTUS handles the legal challenge to that, if it is carried through as stated.
30.09.2025 21:26 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Who is all this aimed at? The TV audience? It can't be the generals and admirals in the hall, who didn't attain high rank without being able to tell fact from fiction.
30.09.2025 14:37 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0If this means what it appears to mean, it feels like the most consequential thing he's said.
30.09.2025 13:12 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 1Odd how, according to Russia, civilian casualties in Ukraine are all caused by air defences, but the same is never true in Russia.
Ukrainian attacks are clearly directed overwhelmingly at economic and military targets.
Well, he was very well-known. But itβs a bit odd to say βnow she makes worksβ for him, given heβs been dead since 2021.
28.09.2025 06:47 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Putin has increased Russia's VAT rate to 22% from 20%, breaking a pledge not to raise taxes before 2030. Another indication of a creaking Russian economy.
25.09.2025 11:59 β π 317 π 62 π¬ 12 π 1Switzerland, yes (important). But EU members, notably Ireland, do have a trade agreement with the US.
26.09.2025 18:18 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0So it's basically about India again, is it?
26.09.2025 17:49 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Yes - I almost added that. Superb film.
26.09.2025 10:32 β π 11 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Interesting thought for those who argue that armed helicopters have no place in modern conflicts.
26.09.2025 10:28 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Quite possibly written by someone born after the GDR had disappeared, so never had the chance to experience a real surveillance state.
26.09.2025 10:24 β π 31 π 0 π¬ 1 π 1It's a good question, but I agree that given China's then-isolation from the global economy (and much less developed globalisation more generally) I think I stand by my call.
I suppose the Bolshevik Revolution might have a stronger claim. But whichever, neither are very happy precedents.
Can't help feeling the US is becoming a laboratory for the largest political, economic and social experiment in history.
Not sure what would be the control group: maybe Denmark or Canada?
What a great story.
24.09.2025 11:10 β π 26 π 4 π¬ 1 π 0We can hope. Given his interests, I do wonder if recent reporting on increasing Russian problems with energy supplies and exports have got his attention.
Noteworthy, though, that he consistently refers to NATO in the third person, as if the US was not a member. Always "they", not "we".
Excellent news.
24.09.2025 07:35 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0New addition
Journal article: Travels in the Missing Dimension: Official History and Secret Intelligence by Gill Bennett (published 03-07-2025)
https://doi.org/10.1080/09592296.2025.2533022
Ah. That connection hadn't occurred to me.
Still, given that London seems to have been full of US tourists this summer, there should be plenty of people to give a contrary view.
Latest post returns to the battle for Pokrovsk in which both sides have invested heavily. The stakes are high - Russia needs to show something for this yearβs constant and costly offensives. (Β£/free trial). samf.substack.com/p/one-last-p...
23.09.2025 08:01 β π 64 π 19 π¬ 2 π 1Thanks Andrew! You may be right about the unequal struggle between truth and falsehood (cf the famous Mark Twain quotation).
Still, I can't help feeling that without social media those who repeat this rubbish would be reduced to standing on a street corner with a placard saying "The End Is Nigh".