It's the same but for the reboot they used Governors
07.08.2025 02:18 โ ๐ 5 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0@convolutedname.bsky.social
posting about veto players a lot. he/him
It's the same but for the reboot they used Governors
07.08.2025 02:18 โ ๐ 5 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0just simply the best to ever do it
06.08.2025 19:53 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0It's really fine to say "X would be good policy" but in the last 8 years people brained themselves into everything having to be framed as an electoral program
06.08.2025 18:43 โ ๐ 22 ๐ 2 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Expel and revere
06.08.2025 18:41 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0A lot of the "Dems should do X, it would be super popular" genre is something Dems already did, which tells you about the popularity part
06.08.2025 18:34 โ ๐ 78 ๐ 9 ๐ฌ 5 ๐ 2Waiting for the remake of the classic Scrooge McDuck story about the Messina Strait Bridge, but this time he calls it fundamental infrastructure for military mobility
06.08.2025 14:40 โ ๐ 43 ๐ 4 ๐ฌ 3 ๐ 0Study the good book
06.08.2025 15:08 โ ๐ 13 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Ganz solution after saying Fuck Numbers is his own priors, my solution is my priors (Max-Weber-Thought)
06.08.2025 15:03 โ ๐ 19 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Usual Ganz I guess, right diagnosis, treatment idea is bleh
06.08.2025 15:00 โ ๐ 18 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0And who is giving them money honestly, Shor is half brainwormed pundit, half hustling to get the groups that pay him to pay more and new clients.
06.08.2025 14:59 โ ๐ 39 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 1The problem is that a lot of people (not Morris) who start out as data people swiftly cannot resist the call of the punditry.
06.08.2025 14:57 โ ๐ 80 ๐ 12 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 2Like this is a very good analysis of how a few hyper-motivated pundits were twisting the topline data, but lots of people who actually study public opinion were arguing against that. The pundits were just cherry-picking the data that matched their priors
I think we more pollsters and fewer pundits
I have my beef though with the conclusion from saying fuck numbers here, which is as usual pOpuLisM
06.08.2025 14:56 โ ๐ 20 ๐ 2 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0Fuck Numbers thought, recognized more and more
06.08.2025 14:54 โ ๐ 41 ๐ 7 ๐ฌ 3 ๐ 2Not so much an indictment of issue polling as it is (rightly) of feckless leadership and trend-following pundits that only elevate numbers that confirm their priors. Iโd like to see people simultaneously argue both for measurement and against the Yglesias theory of politics and public opinion
06.08.2025 14:49 โ ๐ 241 ๐ 36 ๐ฌ 8 ๐ 3Big national media committed time and space for a theory that was mostly based on people not realizing how big the city of Wuhan is and that was from the beginning used and fanned by partisan actors for their purposes.
06.08.2025 14:19 โ ๐ 52 ๐ 7 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0Ah, naturally
06.08.2025 14:16 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0This is why I am so skeptical of the "glonzo" stuff. Because humoring lab-leak conspiracism just helped get us here. (Not to speak of that biggest actual gonzo issue is immigration)
06.08.2025 14:16 โ ๐ 78 ๐ 6 ๐ฌ 6 ๐ 0I know her mostly as lab-leak weirdo
06.08.2025 14:13 โ ๐ 8 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0She's right, but she did her lion's share to get us here.
06.08.2025 14:10 โ ๐ 35 ๐ 3 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0And not reading and no links is linked and definitely worse than on Twitter.
06.08.2025 13:35 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I am also extra skeptic of viral quotes with no linked article, because often it's completely out of context. Not that it is stopping people from making out of context quotes go viral even without a linked article, because no one reads anything anymore.
06.08.2025 13:34 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Weird parasocial relationship
06.08.2025 13:17 โ ๐ 8 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Why look to the past at all? Because Democrats have a story to tell thatโs relevant to the future. Time and time again, Republican presidents leave behind economic messes, and Democratic presidents clean them up -- @billscher.bsky.social:
washingtonmonthly.com/2025/08/06/w...
me and convoluted when you post rodgler in our replies
06.08.2025 01:21 โ ๐ 11 ๐ 3 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0it is 2017...
it is 2020..
it is 2025..
letting people call them โslide decksโ is when things got out of hand. gotta go back to โpower points.โ
05.08.2025 21:19 โ ๐ 168 ๐ 17 ๐ฌ 6 ๐ 2