Pete Buttigieg questions necessity of Iran conflict
03.03.2026 10:30 โ ๐ 6 ๐ 3 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Pete Buttigieg questions necessity of Iran conflict
03.03.2026 10:30 โ ๐ 6 ๐ 3 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Buttigieg talks life, politics at Amherst College - Via @dailyhampshiregazette #TeamPete #PeteButtigieg #Politics ๐บ๐ธ ๐ณ๏ธ
03.03.2026 04:20 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 2 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Rep. Malcolm Kenyatta and Pete Buttigieg
03.03.2026 03:45 โ ๐ 30 ๐ 7 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0
Pete Buttigieg was campaigning for candidate Bob Brooks in Pennsylvania's Lehigh Valley tonight ๐
I thought this was supposed to be just a small "meet and greet," but over 400 people packed the room.
Let's flip PA-07 blue!!! ๐ช๐
Pete Buttigieg was campaigning for candidate Bob Brooks in Pennsylvania's Lehigh Valley tonight ๐
I thought this was supposed to be just a small "meet and greet," but over 400 people packed the room.
Let's flip PA-07 blue!!! ๐ช๐
PETE BUTTIGIEG EXPLAINS:
We Must Be Clear About
Who Pays the Cost for
War With Iran.
open.substack.com/pub/petebutt...
Pete Buttigieg slams Donald Trump for โwar of choiceโ with Iran - buff.ly/qpGnF1u
02.03.2026 20:45 โ ๐ 16 ๐ 2 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0
This war will do nothing to help - and will very likely make things worse - when it comes to the biggest challenges we face at home.
Trump or his wealthy friends wonโt pay the price. It will fall on service members and their families, on taxpayers, and on working Americans already stretched thin.
I wrote about whatโs at stake - and what we as citizens can do.
Read the full post here:
25Feb26, Pete Buttigieg: โWhen we retake the governmentโฆโ, โAim big and do lots of things (structural and institutional) at once.โ
HOPE. So vitally needed right now.
substack.com/@petebuttigi...
Their loss reminds us why sending troops into harm's way is the gravest responsibility a leader can face - a choice only to be made when there is no real alternative.
02.03.2026 17:58 โ ๐ 1304 ๐ 117 ๐ฌ 36 ๐ 3Grieving for the four American service members known so far to have been killed in action, and praying for the families of these patriots who gave the ultimate sacrifice.
02.03.2026 17:58 โ ๐ 6846 ๐ 991 ๐ฌ 482 ๐ 73Future president Pete Buttigieg on Trump: "Two things are happening โ they're related: He's getting weaker, and he's getting more dangerous. He's getting more dangerous, because he's getting weaker."
02.03.2026 11:51 โ ๐ 5 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0
๐Pete Buttigieg: ๐น๐คก๐ฉ๐ฎDJT Isn't Fooling Us ๐จโ๏ธ๐บ๐ธ
youtube.com/shorts/NH--d...
This poll belongs in the garbage.
Look at how small the sample is.
Also, Stephen A. Smith got 9% in this poll even though only one respondent chose him. ONE RESPONDENT. That one respondent was weighted so heavily that it created this bizarre result.
I'm attending Bob Brooks for Congress's event, โMeet & Greet with Pete Buttigieg & Bob Brooksโ - sign up now to join me! www.mobilize.us/bobbrooksfor...
01.03.2026 20:42 โ ๐ 5 ๐ 2 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0
If you want to see for yourself, here's the poll info:
open.substack.com/pub/tpsioffi...
Look at how small the sample size is. And look at the crosstabs for Smith's numbers. It's obvious that it's only one respondent who selected him.
No, this poll is just genuinely bad.
Only one respondent chose Smith in the poll.
The poll's sample was so small and this one voter was weighted so heavily that it got calculated as 9%.
Here's the poll info:
open.substack.com/pub/tpsioffi...
How did Stephen A. Smith get 9% in this poll?:
The poll's sample of Democrats was very small.
And in the crosstabs, you can tell that only one respondent chose Smith. It was a young Asian male Independent voter from the Great Lakes region. This one voter was HEAVILY weighted in the sample.
Okay, goodbye.๐ You couldn't prove that they have a different stance on this.
01.03.2026 16:43 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0
Pete said he opposes a ban on trans athletes.
It's the SAME STANCE.
Ossoff and Buttigieg have the SAME STANCE on trans athletes.
They both oppose government bans on trans athletes. They both think decisions should be made by sports leagues.
They have the same stance.
You just proved my point, dude.
Go ahead and keep spending your Sunday spewing bullshit.
You're the one who accused me of lying. But you can't even explain what I lied about.
Maybe you should get a hobby instead of talking out of your ass on social media.
You didn't answer my question.
Where did I lie here? ๐
bsky.app/profile/nerd...
On what issue is Ossoff to the left of Buttigieg? Could you explain what issues you're talking about?
Ossoff doesn't support Bernie's Medicare for All plan. He criticized AOC's Green New Deal.
Both Buttigieg and Ossoff have called for members of Congress to stop trading stocks.
โPresident Peteโ: Pete Buttigieg sparks 2028 speculation with visit to New Hampshire www.lgbtqnation.com/2026/02/pres...
01.03.2026 11:55 โ ๐ 8 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0
I was responding to a "Newsom 2028" reply to Pete's post, which I find offensive.
If people are going to post crap like that, I have the right to push back. People need to stop trying to shove Newsom down our throats.
"damaging to the resistance"
Newsom literally brought Steve Bannon onto his podcast and let Bannon claim that Biden stole the 2020 election from Trump. He did not push back on Bannon at all.
Democrats literally control the whole government of California. It's one of the bluest and largest states in the country. So it's the bare minimum to expect him to stand up to Trump.
Virginia is a more purple state than California, and it's taken even bolder moves to oppose Trump.