No, it actually goes directly to farmers
05.03.2026 22:01 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0No, it actually goes directly to farmers
05.03.2026 22:01 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Yes that is my sense too - the @nickkristof.bsky.social column was persuasive! I just havenβt done the research.
05.03.2026 22:00 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Nothing, except for tens of billions of dollars worth of bailout money!
05.03.2026 21:02 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I donβt have a deeper message other than: Food and farming issues almost always involve tradeoffs. I wish people would grapple with the tradeoffs rather than retreat to vibes and ideology. END
05.03.2026 19:49 β π 11 π 1 π¬ 3 π 0Thatβs the story. Obviously, this kind of thing can happen with highly toxic agrichemicals. Itβs still worth keeping in mind that some agrichemicals are extremely useful for farmers and the world - they can help prevent malnutrition and deforestation. (Also: glyphosate isnβt highly toxic!) 7
05.03.2026 19:46 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Even after it was childproofed, a couple farmers left leftover paraquat in bottles in their sheds, so someone could drink it and die a horrible death. So Syngenta had to adult-proof it! They packaged it in backpacks so it could only be applied in fields, and nobody could drink it. 6
05.03.2026 19:42 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
Huh. Seems like a problem!
Well, obviously people arenβt supposed to drink it. But she explained that after a couple awful tragedies with kids, Syngenta made a serious effort to childproof the packaging.
Oof. But then problem solved?
Actually, not quite. 5
The problem, she explained, is that when people drink paraquat, they die excruciatingly horrible deaths. 4
05.03.2026 19:33 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0
One of the execs said: No. Absolutely not. The Parkinsonβs stuff is nonsense, just like the cancer stuff about glyphosate. Butβ¦there is one big problem with paraquat.
Again, I donβt know if what she said about Parkinsonβs is accurate. But obviously I was curious: Whatβs the big problem? 3
A couple of Syngenta execs who read my book and my glyphosate essay and presumably realized Iβm not reflexively anti-pesticide reached out to me. And since Iβm me, my first question was: Whatβs the deal with paraquat? Do you have a huge Parkinsonβs problem? 2
05.03.2026 19:27 β π 6 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
Syngenta announced today that itβs getting out of the paraquat business. I havenβt done a deep dive into paraquatβs health effects like I did with glyphosate, but I do have a macabre story about it! 1
www.theguardian.com/environment/...
I think Iβve spent $120 on maintenance for our ($23K!) 2017 Bolt, not including the deep clean for the crappy seats. The Tesla was $36K (still WAY less expensive than similarly nice gas cars my wife wouldnβt make fun of) and not quite as reliable as the Bolt but way more fun.
05.03.2026 17:55 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0She has a Tesla 3 (boo! I know!) that she loves. My Bolt (again, the bare bones early model) is peppy but it does get blown around a bit on the highway.
05.03.2026 17:14 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Itβs like a 16% bond on my roof!
05.03.2026 17:10 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0No the seats do suck - I got the original bare bones model - and at one point she claimed they had soaked up 9 years of my tennis sweat. I got them deep-cleaned and now she admits theyβre fine, but theyβre still high on her list of Bolt-is-unsexy complaints.
05.03.2026 17:08 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0It was followed by a soliloquy about how unsexy the car is and how embarrassing it is to have a husband who drives it so Iβm gonna say no.
05.03.2026 17:03 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Itβs got extremely cheap seats that according to my beloved spouse have soaked up 9 years of my tennis sweat. Anyone want to buy it?
05.03.2026 17:00 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0FYI, while I really like my Chevy Bolt, yesterday my wife called it a βgolf cart piece of shit stinky stank tank.β
05.03.2026 14:49 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 5 π 0Florida Plunder & Loot did not want us to make our own electricity. They liked selling us electricity! But we jumped through their hoops, and if enough of us can do it we can destroy their unsustainable business model.
05.03.2026 14:25 β π 11 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Our solar panels paid for themselves in 7.5 years if you only count lower electric bills, 6 years if you also count how they replaced our gasoline bills.
05.03.2026 14:16 β π 12 π 2 π¬ 1 π 0Oil price spikes donβt affect my family because we drive electric cars. Natural gas price spikes donβt affect my family because we have solar panels. Your family can be like my family!
05.03.2026 14:15 β π 42 π 10 π¬ 9 π 2Seems bad that the official US foreign policy is now π€·ββοΈ
03.03.2026 17:21 β π 32 π 7 π¬ 3 π 0Ok, Iβll just say the main message of the museum was that Chileans who had way more reason to be fatalistic than we do, and way more to lose from resistance than we do, eventually won.
28.02.2026 17:45 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Iβm at the Museum of Memory and Human Rights in Santiago today. I wonder if weβre going to have a Truth and Reconciliation Commission when all this is over.
28.02.2026 14:20 β π 7 π 0 π¬ 0 π 1My daughter, too. Very solid piece.
26.02.2026 15:16 β π 7 π 3 π¬ 1 π 0
Your helpful innovation is a pernicious distraction from my One True Solution. (Which is inevitably regenerative agriculture.)
foodtank.com/news/2026/02...
Wow: USDA just shoveled more $ to sugar farmers to offset βmarket disruptions.β The entire U.S. sugar program is a market disruption! Itβs a price floor that makes consumers pay more for candy. And Trump already increased it last year!
25.02.2026 15:05 β π 4 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0I feel like factory-farmed pork should not be blamed on our people
25.02.2026 14:36 β π 12 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0And sure, there are subtleties on the ground - land titles, law enforcement, discount rates, etc. But to argue that land sparing is a myth is to suggest that tripling crop and livestock yields over the last 60 years had no impact on deforestation. Itβs lalalalalaing the counterfactual.
24.02.2026 18:57 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0