's Avatar

@justdarnedordinary.bsky.social

112 Followers  |  156 Following  |  124 Posts  |  Joined: 06.01.2025
Posts Following

Posts by (@justdarnedordinary.bsky.social)

I'm talking myself into it!

03.03.2026 12:06 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Yeah, an ID.7 GTX would work too, it manages 1,800kg. Quite a surprising uplift from the RWD 1,000kg

03.03.2026 12:05 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Yeah, an ID.7 GTX would work too, it manages 1,800kg. Quite a surprising uplift from the RWD 1,000kg

03.03.2026 12:05 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I already have VW ID.7, which has 86kWh battery, but the tow weight limit is only 1,000kg

03.03.2026 08:29 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

One I'm looking at might be 1,100kg

03.03.2026 08:23 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Yeah, I know. Difficulty is gonna be distribution of charging points in the Scottish Highlands

03.03.2026 08:23 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Oh lovely! But, erm, maybe I'm getting to old for that! The one I'm looking at might be 1,100kg

03.03.2026 08:20 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Ah, is there a car solution? That would be far too big for many roads in Scotland, particularly the Highlands

02.03.2026 23:22 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

What's that caravan? Weight, in particular. I'd expect EV range when towing to halve, at best. Partner and I both run EVs.

02.03.2026 23:12 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Is there an EV solution for towing a caravan? I'd expect range to halve, at best.

02.03.2026 23:08 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 5    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Saalvo. Enshittified by spell checker :(

27.02.2026 21:48 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Salvo, anyone?

27.02.2026 21:47 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
The political effects of Xโ€™s feed algorithm - Nature Among users initially on a chronological feed, 7 weeks of exposure to Xโ€™s algorithmic feed in 2023 shifted political attitudes and account-following behaviour in a more conservative direction compared...

Brainwashing, 2026 edition. This paper shows how X's algorithmic feed shifts people's views rightwards. It's a sophisticated, highly effective form of reorientation. And it is utterly chilling.
If you're still on that platform, unhook yourself now.
www.nature.com/articles/s41...

23.02.2026 07:42 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2603    ๐Ÿ” 1572    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 81    ๐Ÿ“Œ 136

In competence and venality of the old political elite is ushering in a class of oligarchic politicians that are backed by unprecedented levels of private wealth and driven by some batshit crazy ideas (that just happen to be good for their wealthโ€ฆ)

Thiel is a prime mover in this

08.02.2026 09:10 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 228    ๐Ÿ” 102    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 24    ๐Ÿ“Œ 3
Preview
Scrap Palantir UK contracts over Mandelson links, Zack Polanski demands ZACK Polanski has demanded that the UK Government scraps its contracts with Palantir, amid mounting questions over Peter Mandelsonโ€™s role inโ€ฆ

Get Palantir out of the UK.

Protect our NHS.

Protect our country.

www.thenational.scot/news/2582860...

05.02.2026 13:11 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2815    ๐Ÿ” 924    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 87    ๐Ÿ“Œ 50

Make Peter Thiel into the villain, Democrats.

It's all there.

He is the node that connects Trump, Vance, Palantir, Musk, Epstein, and so many other terrible players.

Just expose it and make him and Musk the face of these psychopathic billionaires ruining our lives.

06.02.2026 04:00 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 6058    ๐Ÿ” 1951    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 244    ๐Ÿ“Œ 137

Can insurers be held liable, perhaps from the last year premiums were paid, before the houses became uninsurable? Home owners therefore given the opportunity to purchase suitable alternative homes, rather than being dumped back into their perennially risky, worthless premises.

02.02.2026 22:56 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Erm... Eastern and Southern Highlands?

23.01.2026 23:52 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Striking images of Dutch bike infrastructure taken by @ModaCityLife.com

Striking images of Dutch bike infrastructure taken by @ModaCityLife.com

IMPORTANT: The Dutch invest โ‚ฌ595 million annually on urban biking, resulting in โ‚ฌ19 BILLION saved in public health care costs alone. Thatโ€™s how smart governments do the math on investing in better mobility.

Letโ€™s be clearโ€” it WASTES public money to NOT do it.

#CityMakingMath HT @modacitylife.com

22.01.2026 07:09 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 333    ๐Ÿ” 144    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 6    ๐Ÿ“Œ 10
Dear Sir Paul,

Re: Royal Society Code of Conduct

I am sure that many scientists have written to you about the specific question of Elon Muskโ€™s Fellowship and whether, under the Royal Societyโ€™s Code of Conduct, his retaining that Fellowship is appropriate. I will not rehash these issues.  Instead, as a female scientist with extensive experience of activities aiming to increase equality, diversity and inclusion in the engineering and physical sciences sector, I am writing to you (in a personal capacity) to ask you to reconsider the statements you have recently made in this context to the UK press about the Royal Societyโ€™s Code of Conduct and how it is applied.  

A 2018 report  from the joint National Academies of the United States of America, concluded that โ€œsexual harassment is common in academic science, engineering, and medicineโ€ and that โ€œgreater than 50 percent of women faculty and staff and 20โ€“50 percent of women students encounter or experience sexually harassing conduct in academiaโ€.  This report described codes of conduct that make clear that sexual harassment is unethical and will not be tolerated as a โ€œpowerful incentive for changeโ€. The authors also noted that sexual harassment can have significant and damaging effects on the integrity of research.  In my own praxis, I have found that clear and consistently-implemented codes of conduct that address these issues make female scientists and engineers safer, and allow them to focus more effectively on their research.  For codes of conduct to have such a positive effect, it is vital that sanctions for actions which transgress the code are meaningful and substantial.

Dear Sir Paul, Re: Royal Society Code of Conduct I am sure that many scientists have written to you about the specific question of Elon Muskโ€™s Fellowship and whether, under the Royal Societyโ€™s Code of Conduct, his retaining that Fellowship is appropriate. I will not rehash these issues. Instead, as a female scientist with extensive experience of activities aiming to increase equality, diversity and inclusion in the engineering and physical sciences sector, I am writing to you (in a personal capacity) to ask you to reconsider the statements you have recently made in this context to the UK press about the Royal Societyโ€™s Code of Conduct and how it is applied. A 2018 report from the joint National Academies of the United States of America, concluded that โ€œsexual harassment is common in academic science, engineering, and medicineโ€ and that โ€œgreater than 50 percent of women faculty and staff and 20โ€“50 percent of women students encounter or experience sexually harassing conduct in academiaโ€. This report described codes of conduct that make clear that sexual harassment is unethical and will not be tolerated as a โ€œpowerful incentive for changeโ€. The authors also noted that sexual harassment can have significant and damaging effects on the integrity of research. In my own praxis, I have found that clear and consistently-implemented codes of conduct that address these issues make female scientists and engineers safer, and allow them to focus more effectively on their research. For codes of conduct to have such a positive effect, it is vital that sanctions for actions which transgress the code are meaningful and substantial.

I was hence aghast to realise that in an interview with the Financial Times  published on 9/1/26, you appear to have suggested that the Royal Society โ€œshould only expel fellows if their science proved โ€œfaulty or fraudulent or highly defectiveโ€โ€.  Moreover, in a further interview with the Guardian  on 11/1/26 you suggested that the code โ€œmay need to be looked at againโ€, with the implication that your aim would be to remove the option of sanctions on Fellows for reasons not strictly related to faults or defects in their research. 

I suggest that changing the Royal Societyโ€™s code of conduct so that the likelihood of serious sanctions for sexual harassment is reduced, would directly endanger women who interact with the Royal Society at events or otherwise, and would provide a licence to harass to the already powerful people on whom the Society bestows fellowship.  The implications of your words - that under your leadership the only infringements of the code which are likely to receive the sanction of the Fellowship being removed are those related to research misconduct - already risk empowering harassers.  You stated, in the Financial Times interview, that โ€œthereโ€™s many bad people around, but they have made scientific advancesโ€.  Given this awareness of the possibility of bad actors in our scientific community, it is wholly irresponsible to suggest that the Royal Society would not act to sanction these people if they harass more vulnerable scientists.

I am hence writing to request that you retract any suggestion that the Societyโ€™s Code of Conduct should be changed so that the only reason a Fellow might be sanctioned by the removal of their Fellowship is โ€œfaulty or fraudulent or highly defectiveโ€ research.  This action is necessary to safeguard female scientists, a requirement placed on the Society by safeguarding legislation and UK statutory guidance. 

Yours sincerely,

Professor Rachel A. Oliver.

I was hence aghast to realise that in an interview with the Financial Times published on 9/1/26, you appear to have suggested that the Royal Society โ€œshould only expel fellows if their science proved โ€œfaulty or fraudulent or highly defectiveโ€โ€. Moreover, in a further interview with the Guardian on 11/1/26 you suggested that the code โ€œmay need to be looked at againโ€, with the implication that your aim would be to remove the option of sanctions on Fellows for reasons not strictly related to faults or defects in their research. I suggest that changing the Royal Societyโ€™s code of conduct so that the likelihood of serious sanctions for sexual harassment is reduced, would directly endanger women who interact with the Royal Society at events or otherwise, and would provide a licence to harass to the already powerful people on whom the Society bestows fellowship. The implications of your words - that under your leadership the only infringements of the code which are likely to receive the sanction of the Fellowship being removed are those related to research misconduct - already risk empowering harassers. You stated, in the Financial Times interview, that โ€œthereโ€™s many bad people around, but they have made scientific advancesโ€. Given this awareness of the possibility of bad actors in our scientific community, it is wholly irresponsible to suggest that the Royal Society would not act to sanction these people if they harass more vulnerable scientists. I am hence writing to request that you retract any suggestion that the Societyโ€™s Code of Conduct should be changed so that the only reason a Fellow might be sanctioned by the removal of their Fellowship is โ€œfaulty or fraudulent or highly defectiveโ€ research. This action is necessary to safeguard female scientists, a requirement placed on the Society by safeguarding legislation and UK statutory guidance. Yours sincerely, Professor Rachel A. Oliver.

Following coverage over the weekend of Sir Paul Nurse's comments that suggested that the only reason that a Fellow should be expelled from @royalsociety.org is scientific misconduct, I have written to him to explain the risks such an attitude poses of increasing sexual harassment in STEM.

12.01.2026 08:59 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 812    ๐Ÿ” 297    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 25    ๐Ÿ“Œ 29

Unhook ourselves from oil and gas and we unhook ourselves from dependency on dictators, autocrats and expansionist regimes all over the planet.
Renewables and other low-carbon energy sources are not just good climate sense. They are also good political sense.

06.01.2026 17:04 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 3560    ๐Ÿ” 1085    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 94    ๐Ÿ“Œ 52
Map showing thousands of walking routes

Map showing thousands of walking routes

Zoomed in showing detail of a route

Zoomed in showing detail of a route

There's a new way to browse and find walks to do for 2026! A *much* requested feature - you can now browse a map of Scotland will ALL our route lines shown at once, to help you find the one you want to do (and easily see how they connect and intersect).
www.walkhighlands.co.uk/maps/big-map...

29.12.2025 16:44 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 99    ๐Ÿ” 29    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 8    ๐Ÿ“Œ 3
I took this photo on the Teign Estuary in Devon in spring 2022. I thought I was just taking a photo of an attractive hole in an old tree. It was only when I got home and looked through my camera roll that I saw the leaping dog, who I'd caught perfectly framed, mid-leap, totally by chance. I remembered the dog immediately, because of what an annoying twat it had been.

I took this photo on the Teign Estuary in Devon in spring 2022. I thought I was just taking a photo of an attractive hole in an old tree. It was only when I got home and looked through my camera roll that I saw the leaping dog, who I'd caught perfectly framed, mid-leap, totally by chance. I remembered the dog immediately, because of what an annoying twat it had been.

THREAD.

The definitive list of the absolute best interdimensional portals I have photographed on walks in the British countryside.

1. Gateway To The Land Of Leaping Dogs.

17.11.2025 08:17 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1362    ๐Ÿ” 375    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 19    ๐Ÿ“Œ 80

Thank you also Rupert @rupertread.bsky.social, for all these important things you do for environmental causes.

27.12.2025 12:39 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

Probably the most significant thing I've ever done? 10,000!

27.12.2025 11:35 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 8    ๐Ÿ” 2    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Shhhh! Keep it from the Shells, Exxons and BPs of this world, who will be truly sh1tting themselves.

19.12.2025 20:43 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

NEW RESEARCH: UK heat pumps can perform far better than many think.

Our analysis of HeatPumpMonitor.org data shows well-designed systems achieve ~40% higher efficiency than past trials (SCoP 3.86 vs 2.81), cutting bills (~ยฃ224/yr) and emissions.

Open access: www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

18.12.2025 11:30 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 149    ๐Ÿ” 52    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 8    ๐Ÿ“Œ 7

As a lunch break thought experiment, I thought - "What's a reasonable way to calculate a 'You're never going to need more money than that' level of wealth"

16.12.2025 17:10 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

According to the OS Map app, you don't need to venture onto the A96. Walk, or cycle over the old bridge near Fochabers to cross The Spey.

14.12.2025 18:32 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

New Year's resolution? Get that "listening age" down to a much more "respectable" under 70. Ok, so I've been going back to the 60s this year, big deal #Spotify #Wrapped

07.12.2025 20:21 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0