Terfipedia

Still blowing my mind that the person who earns royalties from the microtransactions in a Harry Potter themed slot machine app accused me of grifting for having a Patreon which doesn't cover the costs of hosting the sites it's for.

Should you have any doubts about who was behind that account, there's nearly 3,000 tweets archived here.

web.archive.org/web/*/http:/...

This is Graham Linehan, using his ban-evading Twitter account @beezleboozers, using a reaction gif of Joey from Friends to mock trans suicide rates on 1st January 2021.

Detective says details of police handling of case of missing transgender woman 'hard to listen to' Melbourne woman Bridget had been missing for 11 days before her body was found by community members. Family describe police handling of the case as "hell".

Melbourne DJ Bridget Flack went missing for 11 days in December 2000. After relentless searching, the community eventually found her to have died by suicide - one of five Melbourne trans women to have died by suicide during the pandemic.

www.abc.net.au/news/2023-11...

Thread:

First, he mocks the suicide of a 17 year-old trans girl.

Then he deletes it, claiming reasons of morality.

Then he forgets about having done either and mocks the suicide again with exactly the same joke.

Do you need any more evidence that Graham Linehan just says whatever is convenient to him in the moment, with no regard for the truth, than this latest claim that I've been stalking him for "around eight years now"?

God damn it, terfipedia.com is now offline as well as opiumtea.com because I can't afford the web hosting fees.

Please consider a subscription or one-off donation at patreon.com/terfipedia (this covers both sites) so I can get them back online.

Glinner's Lies: Talk TV. In August 2023, Graham was interviewed by Rosanna Lockwood on Talk TV, where he experienced the novelty of someone him mildly questioning his behaviour. - Rosanna Lockwood: "You've compared people in the trans community, to quote, 'nonces'. You often liken people within the trans community to paedophiles." Graham Linehan: "No, what I said was there are central figures within the trans community. Aimee Challenor is one example..." [proceeds to discuss Aimee Challenor's family]. - Graham immediately tries to claim that it was simply a thing he said once, about a specific person. He was, of course, lying. [screenshots of Graham calling people nonces and pedophiles]

Glinner's Lies: In Plain Sight. The audacity of Graham Linehan’s lying is a thing to behold, as this isn’t the only time he’s lied about something while including evidence that completely contradicts the claim he is making. In this case, Aidan Comerford quoted Dennis Noel Kavanagh completely accurately - barely even paraphrasing. Aidan included the screenshot, and Graham included the screenshot of this while yet again trying to discredit Aidan with a combination of lies and ridiculously inappropriate and unfounded speculation about Aidan’s family (which I have redacted here). It’s hard to know how to even respond to someone who lies in such a blatant, visible way, knowing that fellow terfs will never call him out on it. So you don’t respond to him - but you don’t give him a platform either.

Glinner's Lies: His Secret Stalker. In September 2021, I began reporting on Graham Linehan’s abusive behaviour. By an amazing coincidence, this triggered Graham suddenly remembering that I’d actually been stalking him for “decades”, a premise he’s stuck to impressively since then. As with many things Graham says, there is no truth whatsoever to this, yet he’s repeated the lie enough times that he sometimes disturbingly seems to actually believe it. I fully welcome any and all investigation and publication of even anecdotal evidence that mine and Graham’s paths ever crossed prior to my writing about him in 2021. He’s never given an example of this stalking campaign, which somehow escaped his mind to mention for the first fifteen years. But if it’s true, it’s newsworthy, surely? And if it’s not true, it’s newsworthy that a celebrity would attempt to discredit his critics with completely made-up allegations. Obviously you can’t prove a negative, so there’s not even much more I can say about the stalking accusations. It’s just completely made-up, and you would have to ask Graham for examples or evidence, which he will never provide. Also, the accusation that “he even got my idiot brother-in-law to share a smear about me when I was desperately trying to keep my marriage together” relates to James Serafinowicz retweeting me in October 2021. Graham Linehan got divorced in 2020.

Graham Linehan: The Basic Facts. Graham Linehan lost his marriage, friends and career due to developing an all-consuming addiction to Twitter in 2018 that made it impossible for anyone to be around him personally and professionally. As his ex-brother-in-law put it in 2020: "Calling people beards and telling others to fuck off 18 hours a day is definitely worth losing your family for." "Tried for two years [to intervene]. Have given up as have a lot of people." Since then, his entire life has revolved around a single goal: To avoid taking responsibility for this by constructing a narrative whereby the Western world has been captured by a sinister cabal of transgender domestic terrorists, so he was actually making a very important and noble feminist sacrifice by refusing to ever stop yelling into his phone while calling people pedophiles on Twitter. This involves lying, a lot. Bare-faced, lying through his teeth defamations and fabrications to suit his victim narrative, while simultaneously presenting himself as a warrior for free speech, truth and integrity in journalism. Opinions can be debated and there are more than enough to go round when it comes to gender. So this account will focus on a single premise: Graham Linehan is a liar and a fraud, not to be trusted, and should certainly no longer be enabled and platformed by the media.

In June 2020, Graham Linehan was banned from Twitter for “repeated violations of our rules against hateful conduct and platform manipulation”. From November 2020, he began using a series of sock accounts, something he happily admitted to on his Substack. Throughout 2021, he became increasingly abusive under the mask of anonymity, including to Laurie Penny. Then in September 2021, he used his Substack to threaten Laurie with legal action if tweets referring to him as a “vile bigot” were not deleted with an apology. I objected to this attempt to silence his critics, so I started a Twitter account called @glinnerslibel consisting solely of screenshots of his abusive and defamatory tweets, to discourage further abuse and undermine any future threats of litigation. Graham then relentlessly threatened Twitter with legal action and the police until they banned the account as well as my personal one. He also tried to discredit me with the repeated claim that I’d been “stalking him since 2006”. A total fabrication - we’d never interacted prior to 2021. It’s now 2025, and Graham continues to be as abusive, dangerous and dishonest as ever, while inexplicably being platformed and paraded in the media as a free speech martyr. The sheer volume of his lies and abuse inevitably dominates attempts to report on the gender critical movement more generally, so all Glinner-related receipts will be dumped here for those interested in the reality behind the dishonest public narrative. Outside of general smears, Graham has never denied any specific accusation I’ve made, and never will, because he knows I can prove them all.

Graham Linehan is now inciting violence against a specific person.

He's clearly trolling by using the same "joke" as the one he was arrested for but posting it from the US.

Which might not be a crime under UK law, but is very much legally relevant to the investigation already happening in the UK.

This is satirical but they are also word-for-word exact quotes.

No, in your case it's always been 100% about what you were saying. There's just a giant difference between what you say when drunk on Twitter, and what you later claim you were saying on your weekly podcast appearance about being cancelled.

While Terfipedia is (hopefully temporarily) down, here's one of the articles in infographic form.

While I'm on the subject, please consider all Terfipedia infographics public domain. Feel free to save and share them yourselves wherever might be useful. Will do my best to get the site back online, in the meantime the @terfipedia.com account collects the relevant stuff from my feed.

I linked ChatGPT to this article by Jo Bartosch and simply asked "Is this article valid?" I feel like the section on its flaws pretty much encapsulates the more plausibly respectable side of gender critical ideology as a whole.

fairerdisputations.org/porn-trans-p...

If you do a quick Twitter search for the phrase "stand with rex landy", you'll discover that many people like you do in fact want exactly that.

Update: In between cheering on ICE, he's now retweeting this guy on main.

Glinner used to only be comfortable being this Islamophobic when posting from ban evading sock accounts...

Outrageous how many people are getting in trouble simply for innocently writing words on social media.

It really doesn't get enough attention that Graham posed as a woman on Twitter and then transitioned.

Terfipedia infographic: Reduxx's Brass Knuckles. The Criminal Code of Canada classifies brass knuckles and similar devices as prohibited weapons. Possessing, manufacturing, or selling such items is a criminal offense and can lead to severe penalties, including imprisonment for up to five years. They are legally defined as: "The device known as ‘Brass Knuckles’ and any similar device consisting of a band of metal with one or more finger holes designed to fit over the fingers of the hand.” Genevieve Gluck is on record as saying that Anna Slatz shipped the weapons from Canada to "donors in the US and Canada". Reduxx described the weapons as "A 'Keychain'" (their quotes) while saying "We can't tell you what this is for. Use your imagination." It's further described as "a heavy duty industrial clamp and keychain... One self-defence kitty". Reduxx also admitted to committing customs fraud, stating "We declare this item as a 'keychain' for shipping, but we cannot guarantee every country is going to like this." Genevieve Gluck's claim that "Given that they are sold in the US, and Patreon is a US-based company, it's clear that nothing illegal was taking place" is meaningless. Reduxx were selling and shipping them from Canada, where they are illegal. These are the facts. According to Canadian law, Reduxx were selling and shipping prohibited weapons. If you are in Canada and have information regarding the sale of prohibited weapons, you should report it to The Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), who are responsible for enforcing these laws.

Reduxx are panicking and falsely accusing me of lying about them selling brass knuckles. These are the facts.

Despite billionaires accusing me of grifting, the Opium Tea / Terfipedia joint Patreon makes $8 a month and as a result opiumtea.com is currently offline with terfipedia.com likely to follow.

Patreon allows one-off donations now so please consider supporting or subscribing at patreon.com/terfipedia

Not his worst lie, but a useful one in illustrating how this is someone who simply does not hear other people, and filters out any information that doesn't support his victim narrative.

He's been doubling down recently on the lie that Arthur specifically never said he was "not a bigot".

Reduxx sell weapons and portray the trans community as sexual predators.

The people Reduxx describe as "women's rights advocates" believe that most trans people are sexual predators who should be murdered.

This is as clear as incitement to violence gets.

JK Rowling continues to support them.

Terfipedia infographic: Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics. Reduxx are very fond of deploying the "all our stories are true" strawman, which is as wilfully misleading as the site itself. There are eight billion people in the world. More than enough to cherry pick from any demographic you like, to push any narrative you want. If you published a site that exclusively reported on Jewish pedophiles, with the implication that the traits are somehow linked, you would rightly be accused of being dishonest and antisemitic. Even if every individual story was true. Everybody can see what Reduxx are doing, and the people who pretend they can't do so because they endorse it.

This is the terfs' latest free speech martyr Rex Landy, whose "hurty words online" are currently being portrayed as simple misgendering and mockery.