TremereObserver's Avatar

TremereObserver

@tremereobserver.bsky.social

NSFW account. He/Him/They. Profile Pic is of an OC.

308 Followers  |  302 Following  |  1,903 Posts  |  Joined: 11.02.2024
Posts Following

Posts by TremereObserver (@tremereobserver.bsky.social)

This is an illegal, unprovoked and brutal attack that shows once again that the USA and Israel are rogue states.

The UK must end our cosy relationship with the USA and our ongoing support for Israel.

28.02.2026 18:10 β€” πŸ‘ 3291    πŸ” 973    πŸ’¬ 67    πŸ“Œ 52

hey we're doing an operation called Based Epic Chad. lol. everybody will think this is awesome. we will never end up like Mussolini

28.02.2026 09:32 β€” πŸ‘ 3232    πŸ” 533    πŸ’¬ 16    πŸ“Œ 3
Post image

In Herron House #57, Judith's interrogation of Deacon Reed is cut short... but in another way, of course - it's just getting started.

Art by @rabiestl.bsky.social!

See the page in HD and support more Herron House here:
subscribestar.adult/slutwriter

26.02.2026 17:15 β€” πŸ‘ 143    πŸ” 25    πŸ’¬ 7    πŸ“Œ 0

Even if she didn't, I doubt Deacon is going to be hard to convince. Just look at his face in panel 3, he looks so excited to get some of that "constant depravity" he's been hearing about.

Anyone who handles Judith's "interrogation" the way he did is just begging to become their latest stud.

2/

27.02.2026 23:25 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I think we are about to behold the moment Deacon becomes a Triple Agent. It looks like Veronica knew he was watching (which, probably, explains the masturbating with the curtains open; it wasn't JUST that she's a horny MILF, she was laying out the bait) & is prepared to bring him to her side.

1/

27.02.2026 23:19 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
27.02.2026 14:02 β€” πŸ‘ 4514    πŸ” 984    πŸ’¬ 29    πŸ“Œ 19

the party that wants to require ID to vote abruptly invalidating a thousand people’s IDs overnight seems like a pretty giant flashing red light

26.02.2026 16:55 β€” πŸ‘ 12850    πŸ” 4763    πŸ’¬ 8    πŸ“Œ 109

Look I’ve been a critic of Zack Polanski but the treatment of him after his historic win was absolutely disgraceful by the BBC.

It really was obvious to all those watching and listening that the BBC interviewers have an agenda. It’s appears to be a Daily Mail and X agenda.

Just so obvious now.

27.02.2026 09:03 β€” πŸ‘ 643    πŸ” 119    πŸ’¬ 33    πŸ“Œ 7

Happy Birthday to you!

27.02.2026 09:15 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

Tax billionaires out of existence.

26.02.2026 18:52 β€” πŸ‘ 17011    πŸ” 3840    πŸ’¬ 564    πŸ“Œ 304
Video thumbnail

It's advised you hold on to the safety rod during the ride

26.02.2026 21:17 β€” πŸ‘ 570    πŸ” 102    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 1

This this this

People followed the law, now they're changing the law in an arbitrary way to harm people for no reason other than they're hate filled assholes and they did it without any period to comply

It's wrong for every reason

26.02.2026 21:44 β€” πŸ‘ 107    πŸ” 42    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

That's good: Guy makes a comedy movie about the zany guy who bought a katana and travelled to Pakistan to kill Osama Bin Laden, it stars Nicholas Cage.

That's bad: Studio hacks it to pieces.

That's good: Director uploads directors cut to Youtube

That's bad: Also stars Russell Brand.

26.02.2026 22:06 β€” πŸ‘ 27    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

Only reason I ever went to Twitter was because Tumblr self-destructed & all the artists I followed fled there.

25.02.2026 23:02 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

btw for trans women to offer this kind of practical warning and sympathy is a serious mitzvah and we cis women really owe it to them (and to ourselves!) to step up our solidarity in kind

25.02.2026 17:23 β€” πŸ‘ 4212    πŸ” 1081    πŸ’¬ 27    πŸ“Œ 11
Preview
Amazon Change Means Wishlists Might Expose Your Address Amazon is allowing gift senders to choose items from third-party sellers, which could open recipients up to new privacy risks.

A planned change to Amazon means that if people buy items on your wishlist, it could expose your address. Definitely a threat to people who have public wishlists.

www.404media.co/amazon-wishl...

25.02.2026 20:26 β€” πŸ‘ 369    πŸ” 265    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 20
Post image

www.reddit.com/r/StopKillin...

25.02.2026 15:53 β€” πŸ‘ 25    πŸ” 10    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 2

It's so nice to hearing politicians get behind the movement.
Ross Scott was belittled for trying to start this movement because "he was not the right person for the job."
He efforts have lead to "the right people" coming together to final stop the destruction of video games.

25.02.2026 21:28 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

me and @langleygirl02.bsky.social hung out recently..

25.02.2026 17:30 β€” πŸ‘ 590    πŸ” 90    πŸ’¬ 6    πŸ“Œ 1

Most of the worst things happening to humanity are just 500 or so men (and at least one woman) who get together to bankroll evil. It’s not nuanced or complicated. Just true.

24.02.2026 21:02 β€” πŸ‘ 333    πŸ” 164    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 1
What We're Changing Right Now

We heard you, and we want to get this right. So here's what's happening:

We’re delaying our global rollout to the second half of 2026. Where we have legal obligations, we will continue to meet them, but we will only expand globally after we've done the following:

1. Adding more verification options. We already had alternatives in development, including credit card verification. We’ll complete and expand those before scaling globally so you have more options you’re comfortable with.

2. Vendor transparency. We’ll document every verification vendor and their practices on our website, and make it clear in the product who each vendor is. We’ve also set a new requirement: any partner offering facial age estimation must perform it entirely on-device. If they don’t meet that bar, we won’t work with them.

3. A new spoiler channel option. We know many communities use age-restricted channels not for adult content, but for topics people prefer to engage with on their own terms: spoilers, politics, and heavier conversations. We’re building a dedicated spoiler channel option so communities don’t have to age-gate their server just to give members that choice.

4. A technical blog post before global launch. We’ll publish a detailed post explaining how our automatic age determination systems work, including the signal categories and privacy constraints. So you can evaluate our approach for yourselves.

5. Age assurance data in our transparency reports. We’ll include how many users were asked to verify, what methods they used, and how often our automated systems handled it without any user action.

What We're Changing Right Now We heard you, and we want to get this right. So here's what's happening: We’re delaying our global rollout to the second half of 2026. Where we have legal obligations, we will continue to meet them, but we will only expand globally after we've done the following: 1. Adding more verification options. We already had alternatives in development, including credit card verification. We’ll complete and expand those before scaling globally so you have more options you’re comfortable with. 2. Vendor transparency. We’ll document every verification vendor and their practices on our website, and make it clear in the product who each vendor is. We’ve also set a new requirement: any partner offering facial age estimation must perform it entirely on-device. If they don’t meet that bar, we won’t work with them. 3. A new spoiler channel option. We know many communities use age-restricted channels not for adult content, but for topics people prefer to engage with on their own terms: spoilers, politics, and heavier conversations. We’re building a dedicated spoiler channel option so communities don’t have to age-gate their server just to give members that choice. 4. A technical blog post before global launch. We’ll publish a detailed post explaining how our automatic age determination systems work, including the signal categories and privacy constraints. So you can evaluate our approach for yourselves. 5. Age assurance data in our transparency reports. We’ll include how many users were asked to verify, what methods they used, and how often our automated systems handled it without any user action.

What We're Actually Trying to Do

Our goal is straightforward: keep the Discord experience completely unchanged for the vast majority of people while ensuring an age-appropriate experience for everyone. Over 90% of users will never need to verify their age to continue using Discord exactly as they do today. This is powered in part by our internal safety systems, which can already make an age determination for many adult users without any user action. We'll publish the methodology behind this in a technical blog post before we launch globally.

We know many of you believe the right answer is not to do this at all. We hear you. We also know these changes carry different weight for different communities, and that for some, questions of privacy and identity aren't just preferences but safety concerns shaped by real experience. That's not lost on us, and it directly informs the choices we're making. We also know, from running this platform for more than 10 years, that teens need real safeguards. The number of teenagers on Discord has significantly increased since the pandemic, and they deserve an experience appropriate to their age. At the same time, we believe adults should be able to have a full content experience on Discord. Doing both responsibly means having safeguards that help ensure age-restricted content stays in adult spaces.

But the specific way age assurance works (the verification methods, the compliance requirements) is being shaped by legislation already in effect in the UK and Australia, with Brazil quick to follow, and Europe and multiple US states close behind. By building this ourselves, we can show regulators that it's possible to verify age without collecting identity.

What We're Actually Trying to Do Our goal is straightforward: keep the Discord experience completely unchanged for the vast majority of people while ensuring an age-appropriate experience for everyone. Over 90% of users will never need to verify their age to continue using Discord exactly as they do today. This is powered in part by our internal safety systems, which can already make an age determination for many adult users without any user action. We'll publish the methodology behind this in a technical blog post before we launch globally. We know many of you believe the right answer is not to do this at all. We hear you. We also know these changes carry different weight for different communities, and that for some, questions of privacy and identity aren't just preferences but safety concerns shaped by real experience. That's not lost on us, and it directly informs the choices we're making. We also know, from running this platform for more than 10 years, that teens need real safeguards. The number of teenagers on Discord has significantly increased since the pandemic, and they deserve an experience appropriate to their age. At the same time, we believe adults should be able to have a full content experience on Discord. Doing both responsibly means having safeguards that help ensure age-restricted content stays in adult spaces. But the specific way age assurance works (the verification methods, the compliance requirements) is being shaped by legislation already in effect in the UK and Australia, with Brazil quick to follow, and Europe and multiple US states close behind. By building this ourselves, we can show regulators that it's possible to verify age without collecting identity.

Here's what that looks like in practice:

For 90%+ of users, nothing changes. Most users never access age-restricted content or change their default safety settings. For those who do, we have an internal system that works to accurately determine your age. Discord already runs safety systems that catch spam rings, prevent raids, and detect coordinated abuse, powered by our rules engine (which we just open sourced as Osprey for other platforms to use). Age determination works the same way, using the same category of account-level signals: how long your account has existed, whether you have a payment method on file, what types of servers you're in, and general patterns of account activity. It does not read your messages, analyze your conversations, or look at the content you post. We know "trust us" isn't enough here, which is why we'll publish the methodology before global launch.

If you're among the less than 10% of users who do need to verify, we'll give you options, designed to tell us only your age and never your identity. And if you choose not to verify, here’s exactly what happens: you keep your account, your servers, your friends list, your DMs, and voice chat. The only thing that changes is you won't be able to access age-restricted content or change certain default safety settings designed to protect teens. Nothing else about your Discord experience changes.   

Your age group is private. No other user on Discord can see it.

Here's what that looks like in practice: For 90%+ of users, nothing changes. Most users never access age-restricted content or change their default safety settings. For those who do, we have an internal system that works to accurately determine your age. Discord already runs safety systems that catch spam rings, prevent raids, and detect coordinated abuse, powered by our rules engine (which we just open sourced as Osprey for other platforms to use). Age determination works the same way, using the same category of account-level signals: how long your account has existed, whether you have a payment method on file, what types of servers you're in, and general patterns of account activity. It does not read your messages, analyze your conversations, or look at the content you post. We know "trust us" isn't enough here, which is why we'll publish the methodology before global launch. If you're among the less than 10% of users who do need to verify, we'll give you options, designed to tell us only your age and never your identity. And if you choose not to verify, here’s exactly what happens: you keep your account, your servers, your friends list, your DMs, and voice chat. The only thing that changes is you won't be able to access age-restricted content or change certain default safety settings designed to protect teens. Nothing else about your Discord experience changes. Your age group is private. No other user on Discord can see it.

So Discord is doubling down. No surprises here.

Their age verification rollout bullshit is delayed to the second half of the year.

discord.com/blog/getting...

24.02.2026 19:16 β€” πŸ‘ 436    πŸ” 319    πŸ’¬ 9    πŸ“Œ 10

They’ll criminalize everything except being in a billionaire pedo ring.

24.02.2026 22:24 β€” πŸ‘ 1045    πŸ” 302    πŸ’¬ 9    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Artists and writers are often hesitant to disclose they’ve collaborated with AI – and those fears may be justified Whether they’re famous composers or first-year art students, creators experience reputational costs when AI enters the mix.

Shocking that people don't respect output made by the environment-destroying plagiarism machine.

And it really gives away the position of the people who conducted this study that they used the word "collaborate." Artists don't collaborate with AI. It's not a colleague, it's a computer program.

24.02.2026 22:30 β€” πŸ‘ 232    πŸ” 66    πŸ’¬ 9    πŸ“Œ 1

you should keep drying up their user revenue source in the middle of
trying to take the company public

24.02.2026 19:32 β€” πŸ‘ 3436    πŸ” 1889    πŸ’¬ 6    πŸ“Œ 4

It's literally the "we are still doing it but now we would like you to be less mad about it." post. After 3 backdowns that didn't even back down they pull out another BIG puppy eyed SUPER sorry backdown that ALSO doesn't back down.

No. You've fuckied your last wucky, UwU.

bsky.app/profile/teal...

24.02.2026 20:55 β€” πŸ‘ 7110    πŸ” 3702    πŸ’¬ 78    πŸ“Œ 26
Preview
Fake Zoom meeting "update" silently installs surveillance software A fake Zoom meeting page looks real, triggers a bogus β€œupdate,” and silently installs surveillance software.

A fake Zoom meeting site mimics a video call, then uses an β€œUpdate Available” countdown to automatically download a malicious installer onto Windows machinesβ€”no permission required.

24.02.2026 17:10 β€” πŸ‘ 12    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

If you use a stungun on these things they'll be dead as a doornail nobody will be able to prove you did anything.

24.02.2026 16:45 β€” πŸ‘ 120    πŸ” 45    πŸ’¬ 11    πŸ“Œ 0

Said it earlier today: The job of the Billionaire Fan Club is to manufacture consent for rule by wealth. In exchange they get elevated in status and enough money for comfort, but not independence.

For them, being damned because they bowed and scraped for a rich pedophile is an existential crisis.

24.02.2026 17:21 β€” πŸ‘ 351    πŸ” 139    πŸ’¬ 7    πŸ“Œ 1
Preview
One lawyer could take down California’s abortion shield. His star client is a convicted abuser Prominent conservative attorney Jonathan Mitchell wants to build a national abortion ban through California. His client is a convicted abuser of women.

Far-right activists are in court today trying to restrict access to abortion pills by claiming women are coerced into taking them. So it's worth reading about a male plaintiff in a separate Jonathan Mitchell case: Jerry Rodriguez's girlfriend told police he strangled her 8 times. 2x convicted abuser

24.02.2026 17:17 β€” πŸ‘ 113    πŸ” 69    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 5
Video thumbnail

πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ British actor Ian McKellen read a poem by Ukrainian veteran Artur Dron, β€œFirst to the Corinthians,” on the anniversary of the full-scale invasion.

24.02.2026 11:12 β€” πŸ‘ 606    πŸ” 211    πŸ’¬ 15    πŸ“Œ 20