Yasmine

This truly reflects Arsenal's historical standing in European competitions. Being the first English team to achieve this feat at the San Siro speaks volumes.

This was indeed a rare interview. The fact that he could cite Kant's determinism within such a grand historical context speaks volumes about the depth of his thought. Such European voices are becoming increasingly rare.

Haha, that's a very elegant way to "reverse-sell." Even if it only takes 15 seconds of their time, it's still a small contribution to the world.

This is more of a structural fact than a timeline issue. Political cycles can hinder synergy for a long time, but they do not eliminate the interdependence between markets.

What this type of intervention truly "punctures" is not necessarily a specific project, but rather the market's assumption of "unlimited, low-friction acquisition of key equipment." Once this premise is shaken, valuations will naturally correct.

These two options are indeed the most "systemically impactful." Once intellectual property protection and capital market access are involved, it's no longer just symbolic pressure, but directly affects corporate valuations, financing capabilities, and long-term strategic planning.

The tools are indeed in the EU's hands, but the key lies in the pace of implementation and political will. The power of DMA and DSA lies not in the texts themselves, but in whether they dare to use them consistently and without exception.

This is precisely the problem: the market's strong reaction indicates that policy risks have been underestimated for a long time. Do you think the US government will actually adjust its course because of this?

It's easy to dislike a song, but it's much harder to understand a country.

Buying what you really want after spending over 50 is actually a victory.

Normal elections are the norm in democracy, while the use of state violence against the people signifies a fundamental change in the nature of power—a point that holds true in both modern and pre-modern politics.

Yes, this point is often overlooked. Many people describe the problem as "paying the price for the future," but in reality, contemporary society is already bearing the consequences, and the future will simply experience an amplified version.

Such governments almost never step down "voluntarily"; even seemingly peaceful transfers of power are usually the result of a collapse in legitimacy and immense pressure.

This is truly "German". First-time visitors to Germany are often shocked by the fact that everything is closed on Sundays. In reality, it's more like a deliberately reserved day off, which is actually quite friendly to families, walks, and coffee.

It is precisely because of our understanding of German history that we realize the relationship between violence, elections, and the rule of law is far more complex than a simple analogy, and deserves serious discussion.

Interestingly, in Germany, the "garden vs. car" dilemma often becomes a matter of space, while in some countries, cars are forced to give way to public spaces or small green areas. This reflects different lifestyles and values.

The key issue isn't just "short-term or long-term," but rather who is creating the emissions and who is bearing the costs. In Germany, lignite has the greatest environmental externalities, yet it still hasn't been properly priced.

This may reflect the militarization of law enforcement agencies and the demilitarization of the military's image.

This assumption highlights Europe's structural concerns about over-reliance on external security guarantees.

The key issue is not just personal conflicts, but the actual impact of her party's policies and rhetoric on minority groups.

Davos is always exciting, and the drama never disappoints.

In comparison, Group A should be more intense and competitive.

When security and sovereignty are openly discussed, it means that the existing order is no longer seen as a given.

The fact that he encountered fans who came specifically to see him at an away game shows that he has already gained attention.

Climate change is reshaping geography and international relations.

This is precisely why we cannot just look at the surface narrative, but must dissect what actually happened behind the scenes.

This is a flawed analogy. Nazi Germany in 1944–45 was not simply a 'victim,' but rather the perpetrator of aggression and genocide.

I agree with the direction, but the key is how to actually do it; otherwise, the narrative will easily remain just slogans.

In which issues do you find it most obvious?

Do not give up, do not yield, but do not escalate. Use organization, votes, and the power of discourse, not conflict.