I just learned that Ayatollah Khamenei and Ayatollah Khomenei are not the same person. Here's my plan for regime change in Iran....(1/23)
02.03.2026 02:37 β π 1880 π 267 π¬ 31 π 12@heidikitrosser.bsky.social
Law professor focusing on constitutional law, especially free speech, the separation of powers, and government secrecy. Friend to all dogs and cats. Champion procrastinator.
I just learned that Ayatollah Khamenei and Ayatollah Khomenei are not the same person. Here's my plan for regime change in Iran....(1/23)
02.03.2026 02:37 β π 1880 π 267 π¬ 31 π 12My new book explains how trump has used contrived emergencies in an effort to consolidate power w/out limits of a kind claimed by 17th century monarchs. His unilateral war in Iran is part of this effort & the failure of Congress to respond is constitutional failure: www.rienner.com/title/Above_...
02.03.2026 03:58 β π 6 π 4 π¬ 0 π 0Seems like a thing more people should be mad about
02.03.2026 02:38 β π 1430 π 383 π¬ 45 π 5Honestly one thing that really cheered me up this week was every time I went to an exhibition about the end of Reconstruction it was a useful reminder that, yes, progress goes backwards, things do get worse. Just gotta keep trying to make things better in your own time.
02.03.2026 01:53 β π 121 π 15 π¬ 5 π 24 years ago, I was dealing with a health insurance barrier thatβs all too familiar to US pts: denied, fought w/ insurer, ensnared in both insurance and hospital bureaucracies that led to a delay that incited collections. My book Coverage Denied shows this system is no accident but destabilizes many.
02.03.2026 00:27 β π 39 π 4 π¬ 1 π 1That *is* rad!!
02.03.2026 00:27 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I just read this and found it surprisingly gripping. He says no doctrine would seem βmore sinister and alarming than that a President [...] can vastly enlarge his mastery over the internal affairs of the country by his own commitment of the Nationβs armed forces to some foreign venture.β (p. 642)
02.03.2026 00:13 β π 93 π 41 π¬ 5 π 1Thanks! I realized too late that I should have said "Justice Robert Jackson!"
01.03.2026 23:30 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Indeed. He also 100% understood that his job as SCOTUS Justice was different than his job as FDR's AG. (He had a great footnote to that effect in Youngstown, as you might know).
01.03.2026 23:23 β π 7 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0100% And to think that it was Friedrich's draft-dodging (in Germany) that inflicted the Trumps on the U.S. in the first place.
01.03.2026 23:21 β π 14 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0Itβs obscene to have this draft dodger whose children *never* served and whose father never served and whose grandfather was kicked out of Germany for dodging service, wheezing platitudes about the unnecessary deaths he caused to other peopleβs children who did serve their country.
01.03.2026 23:18 β π 1816 π 559 π¬ 66 π 18Maybe JD Vance read Youngstown as a law student. Though if he did, any significance to him would be dwarfed by his cravenness and hunger for power. Plus, who are we kidding β¦ he spent his law school time sucking up to Peter Thiel and Amy Chua and writing his execrable book.
01.03.2026 23:10 β π 39 π 5 π¬ 2 π 0Screenshot of a tweet from x.com by Senator Dave McCormick that reads: Now would be a good time for Democrats to drop their opposition to DHS funding and pass the bill to support our homeland security. Continuing to play political games with our national security given the unfolding situation in the Middle East is dangerous.
Boy, does this make me think of Justice Jacksonβs Youngstown concurrence, in which he warns of the danger of a president unilaterally initiating a war, and then using that war as a bootstrap to claim extraordinary powers at home.
01.03.2026 23:06 β π 1399 π 376 π¬ 47 π 15
Come to Charlottesville this May for a weekend about liberalism, ethics, civic virtue, and public religion.
Feat @jamellebouie.net, @hollybfletcher.bsky.social, @sarahposner.bsky.social, @sjshancoxli.liberalcurrents.com, @shortle.bsky.social and more!
www.pulaskiinstitution.org/events/for-g...
"American innovation" now refers to making a kind of atrocity cronut by combining insider trading with war crimes.
01.03.2026 15:19 β π 2709 π 740 π¬ 42 π 25Time and again, the story of the successful resistance to Trumpβs authoritarianism is in the strength and courage of individuals, often at great personal risk, set against marked cowardice by institutions and elected officials in positions of actual power.
01.03.2026 16:51 β π 355 π 81 π¬ 3 π 2The unitary executive!
01.03.2026 16:45 β π 7 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0Corruption and Cruelty. Itβs this administrationβs brand.
01.03.2026 16:37 β π 7 π 3 π¬ 0 π 0I like to distract myself from the terrifying political news by reading the ridiculous political news.
28.02.2026 13:49 β π 2746 π 561 π¬ 96 π 29These assholes are really gonna go with βwar is peace, actually.β
01.03.2026 03:10 β π 2682 π 536 π¬ 93 π 12Terrifyingly Orwellian. With the added kick of lapdog GOP House members weighing in.
01.03.2026 03:52 β π 50 π 9 π¬ 1 π 1Reminder that Trump gutted VOA Farsi.
28.02.2026 08:20 β π 1133 π 364 π¬ 16 π 6> @covie93.bsky.social
28.02.2026 16:11 β π 25845 π 5432 π¬ 246 π 183
If we had a remotely responsible Congress that placed the interests of the country first, it would be no-brainer to impeach Donald Trump. It would have been a no-brainer a month ago too. And the month before that, and the month before that ...
But alas.
This war is dumb and illegal
28.02.2026 15:41 β π 1343 π 377 π¬ 52 π 58
It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
This entire administration is one big embarrassing 12-year-old's idea of what being a man means.
28.02.2026 15:39 β π 54 π 10 π¬ 2 π 1'The lack of any effective legal constraints on the president isn't just a problem for the balance of power & national security of the United States. It is a problem for the world...a kind of int'l authoritarianism in which the president can unleash the most powerful military in the world on a whim'
28.02.2026 15:36 β π 371 π 114 π¬ 4 π 0
Itβs worth emphasizing that the Supreme Court has propped up this presidential lawlessness.
When Congress enacted limits on presidential power in 1973, it included an enforcement provision. If the president said thereβs an βemergency from attackβ and Congress disagreed, it could order troops home.