Read some Piaget, please!

How will conversion practices ban help protect gender questioning children? Those who are struggling with their identity and are unquestioningly being pushed down a gender affirmative route when they just need someone to listen to them, rather than reflexively affirm on the basis of ideology.

Do you perhaps not understand that this is a response to them feeling dehumanised by you.

No, the lives and futures of these children were less important to them than the validation of their sexual fetish.

So forgive me, if I fail to heed their messages of moderation and child centredness, now they realise a grand reckoning is about to happen. It is too little and years too late.

The children who were gender non conforming, autistic, victims of sexual, physical or emotional abuse, children who would grow up to be gay or lesbian, children who were in care.

They promoted a pseudo medical pathway, laughably called 'gender affirmative care', that has harmed innumerable children. They didn't care that it was targeting our most vulnerable children and young adults.

It was these so called moderates who encouraged the targeting of our most vulnerable children to demonstrate the universality of their sexual fetish. For them, the welfare and future lives of children were expendable; mere collateral damage.

There can be no compromise with the "moderates" in the transgender movement when it comes to the protection and safeguarding of children.

Transgenderism is a horrific attack on children and childhood by men seeking to justify their sexual fetish.

Unless they become so overwhelmed by the horror and hopelessness of their 'transition' that they kill themselves. They can then be hailed as a martyr for the cause. (Sick, cynical bastards)

Hence, the 'transchild' fabrication, job done, and the child can then be discarded by the movement as damaged goods.

It continues throughout childhood as children and their parents are manipulated to believe that any troubles the child has are caused by being 'born in the wrong body'. Problems that they are assured can be solved by taking on a trans identity.

To achieve this aim requires a sophisticated grooming process for both the child and society. One which starts at infancy with the baby being performatively 'breastfed' by a trans identifying man.

Why? Children provide bullet-proof camouflage to hide the fetish behind. (Transgenderism due to the removal of safeguarding processes around children has also become a movement rife with paedophiles using it as a method to more easily gain access to vulnerable children).

A core aim of transgenderism via gender affirmative care is to push a predominantly adult male fetish - dressing as a sexualised, pornified woman - onto children to make them unknowing accomplices.

Yeah, it's great if you like sharing a bath with MAPs and paedophiles. This place is crawling with them. Like X, 2 plus years ago

They will start when Israel gets involved.

Women identify as trans to EVADE womanhood

Men identify as trans to INVADE womanhood

It pretends to fight for the powerless but, in truth, is employed by those (with power) who wish to exercise 'queerness' against others for nefarious reasons, without being held accountable.

'Queer' is a cancer in our society.

'Queer' is an unconscionable trick that has been played on us all. It has 'queered' our reality and language and thus our access to truth.

The victims are always those with less knowledge and power. Women on lower incomes unable to buy privacy and spaces away from men. Children who have no idea the magnitude of the deception being played on them.

Take Transgenderism

Who broadly has gained most? Men seeking access to women's bodies, sports and spaces by confusing (queering) language around sex and gender. They have also used the same 'queering' tactic in the language around children's consent and safeguarding to gain access to children.

Queer' is the go to ideology/tool of the unscrupulous when seeking advantage in Western society.
Why?
The avowed aim when 'queering' is to confuse those with less knowledge (and power), to remove accountability, to take advantage of their confusion to achieve what they would never ordinarily allow

Everyone should be aware of just how censorious Bluesky is- labelling important legal analysis relating to an imminent Supreme Court case as “intolerance”. Absolutely bonkers and reminiscent of Twitter in the good old days.

The utter idiocy of the Western bourgeoisie in providing cover for these groups, just to gain some virtue signalling points, is staggering.

Transactivism will slowly wither to its core constituents in the next few years. We will be left with the paedophiles, misogynists, quack doctors, mentally ill, and homophobes pushing this harmful belief...

Bluesky is currently the perfect example of what happens when safeguarding children is not prioritised & downgraded in favour of profitability.

It is awash with paedophilic/MAP accounts🤮 If you choose to make your bed there, that is who you share it with.

I'm sticking with X

Bluesky is a haven of free speech for paedophiles/MAPS, incest lovers, and furries.

Yet, if I were to say 'a transwoman is a man,' I would be labelled 'intolerant' and banned.

Know a forum by whose speech they ban.

Part of the same problem I would suggest. Male entitlement unchecked.

Listen. I agree. Those perps are using 'queer' as cover. Please don't deny this.

bsky.app/profile/booc...