Alec Muffett's Avatar

Alec Muffett

@alecmuffett.bsky.social

everybody deserves good security. https://alecmuffett.com/about

5,075 Followers  |  1,149 Following  |  3,448 Posts  |  Joined: 04.06.2023
Posts Following

Posts by Alec Muffett (@alecmuffett.bsky.social)

Yep. How many teenagers do you know on Facebook? New technologies are going to arise and will be adopted because they are more compelling or more open. Teenagers will get better at faking shit or just circumventing it entirely. "Finsta" was years ago. The wheel will turn.

03.03.2026 20:55 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
I asked ChatGPT about the availability of VPN software in every instance of Linux, and about how the State might try to prevent its use, plus how much it costs to β€œroll your own” VPN Discussion attached below; I agree with its conclusions 100% Hat-tip to Alan Cox for reminding me that every version of the Linux kernel has had VPN capability baked into it for nearly 30 years. Th…

The problem there is that you, like the government, believe that VPNs are special.

They are not. Anybody can set them up.

Also: see Tor.

alecmuffett.com/article/113969

03.03.2026 20:28 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

ps: Go look up the history of the satanic cult moral panic surrounding dungeons and dragons

03.03.2026 20:16 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I'm not expecting the stupidity to start to unwind *properly* for about 5 years. It will take at least that long for the damage to rack up and people to start suffering and have their reputations harmed by having been associated with it.

03.03.2026 20:15 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Yes I am absolutely certain that they will fail. They will certainly try and they will probably kill a few people in the process, but they will fail.

03.03.2026 19:55 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
β€œGovernments should halt plans to roll out age checks on online services until privacy and security concerns are addressed, hundreds of academics said today” Article: Archived at Via:

β€œGovernments should halt plans to roll out age checks on online services until privacy and security concerns are addressed, hundreds of academics said today”
https://alecmuffett.com/article/147820
#AgeVerification #censorship #surveillance

03.03.2026 12:05 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 8    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

"We called London a war zone and moved to Dubai by mistake"

03.03.2026 08:16 β€” πŸ‘ 6129    πŸ” 1482    πŸ’¬ 85    πŸ“Œ 41

#WeAreSwindon

03.03.2026 10:20 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The proliferation of nut sensitivity is the regrettable consequence of a bunch of bad regulation to keep the mass of kids away from nuts as a precautionary measure to "keep them safe".

Hence the metaphor.

02.03.2026 15:04 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Social Media Bans are like the β€œPeanut Allergy” Bans of the 1990s/2000s: they will unnecessarily create a generation who cannot cope with the digital environment If you forcibly isolate an entire generation from influences that they are bound to encounter later in life, you are doing them harm by preventing them learning early how to cope. β€œIf we are …

Social Media Bans are like the β€œPeanut Allergy” Bans of the 1990s/2000s: they will unnecessarily create a generation who cannot cope with the digital environment
https://alecmuffett.com/article/147662
#SocialMedia #SocialMediaBan #censorship #ofcom

02.03.2026 12:05 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
β€œThe world wants to ban children from social media, but there will be grave consequences for us all”| Taylor Lorenz | …Age Verification is Digital ID via the back door Age-verification systems require collecting sensitive data to support the biometric information. In no time, the internet will become a fully surveilled digital panopticon

β€œThe world wants to ban children from social media, but there will be grave consequences for us all”| Taylor Lorenz | …Age Verification is Digital ID via the back door
https://alecmuffett.com/article/147647
#AgeVerification

02.03.2026 10:05 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 9    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

IMPORTANT: this letter in the WSJ is amongst the clearest expressions of wisdom you'll read, re: blanket bans on teen social media access.

We saw this with peanut allergies: early avoidance yields later life-threatening adult reactiveness at scale. Managed exposure during youth prevents harm.

01.03.2026 09:15 β€” πŸ‘ 10    πŸ” 8    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
If you read 1 thing about Social Media Bans this week, it should be Rod Wilson’s magisterial letter to the WSJ; extract, text & link below β€œBans feel decisive, but they avoid the harder truth: The digital environment isn’t temporary, and adolescence can’t be postponed until it becomes convenient for adults. We aren’t raising chi…

If you read 1 thing about Social Media Bans this week, it should be Rod Wilson’s magisterial letter to the WSJ; extract, text & link below
https://alecmuffett.com/article/147467
#SocialMediaBan #censorship #parenting

28.02.2026 20:05 β€” πŸ‘ 14    πŸ” 8    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1
Preview
Across Civil Society you can almost hear the mumbling of activists suddenly staring at their shoes wondering if they now have to defend AI & β€œEffective Altruism” against Trump ZOMG! Defense secretary Pete Hegseth designates Anthropic a supply chain risk | The Verge archived at Anthropic response & rebuttal:

Across Civil Society you can almost hear the mumbling of activists suddenly staring at their shoes wondering if they now have to defend AI & β€œEffective Altruism” against Trump
https://alecmuffett.com/article/147459
#EffectiveAltruism #anthropic #hegseth

28.02.2026 18:05 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
If you read 1 thing about Social Media Bans this week, it should be Rod Wilson’s magisterial letter to the WSJ; extract, text & link below β€œBans feel decisive, but they avoid the harder truth: The digital environment isn’t temporary, and adolescence can’t be postponed until it becomes convenient for adults. We aren’t raising chi…

If you read 1 thing about Social Media Bans this week, it should be Rod Wilson’s magisterial letter to the WSJ; extract, text & link below
https://alecmuffett.com/article/147467
#SocialMediaBan #censorship #parenting

28.02.2026 20:05 β€” πŸ‘ 14    πŸ” 8    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

Doubtless, but still happy to see the exchanges.

28.02.2026 18:18 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Across Civil Society you can almost hear the mumbling of activists suddenly staring at their shoes wondering if they now have to defend AI & β€œEffective Altruism” against Trump ZOMG! Defense secretary Pete Hegseth designates Anthropic a supply chain risk | The Verge archived at Anthropic response & rebuttal:

Across Civil Society you can almost hear the mumbling of activists suddenly staring at their shoes wondering if they now have to defend AI & β€œEffective Altruism” against Trump
https://alecmuffett.com/article/147459
#EffectiveAltruism #anthropic #hegseth

28.02.2026 18:05 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Absolutely bonkers approach to technology from the House of Lords.

28.02.2026 10:36 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Screenshot of amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill with a new clause beginning:
"AI search services safety: offence
(1) It is an offence for the provider of a generative AI search service to allow the
creation, viewing, listening to, sharing, broadcasting or storing, using that service,
of contentβ€”
(a) that would be illegal content, as defined by section 59 of the Online Safety
Act 2023 ('illegal content' etc),
(b) that would be content that is harmful to children, as defined by section 60
of that Act ('content that is harmful to children'), if the user is a child,"
and with a definition
"(2) For the purposes of this section, a generative AI search service means a deep or
large language model able to generate text, images and other content based on
the data on which they were trained and user prompts."

Screenshot of amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill with a new clause beginning: "AI search services safety: offence (1) It is an offence for the provider of a generative AI search service to allow the creation, viewing, listening to, sharing, broadcasting or storing, using that service, of contentβ€” (a) that would be illegal content, as defined by section 59 of the Online Safety Act 2023 ('illegal content' etc), (b) that would be content that is harmful to children, as defined by section 60 of that Act ('content that is harmful to children'), if the user is a child," and with a definition "(2) For the purposes of this section, a generative AI search service means a deep or large language model able to generate text, images and other content based on the data on which they were trained and user prompts."

Baroness Kidron has tabled an amendment that would criminalise most, if not all, general-purpose LLMs bills.parliament.uk/publications...

The offence says "generative AI search service" but there's no search or service element in the definition – just models.

#CPBill #genAI #censorship #techpolicy

27.02.2026 20:52 β€” πŸ‘ 11    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 2
Post image

> We aren’t raising children for a world without algorithms. We are raising them for a world shaped by artificial intelligence, public visibility and constant comparison. Removing access doesn’t build resilience, judgment or self-regulation. It simply […]

Read it at:

www.wsj.com/opinion/if-t...

28.02.2026 00:55 β€” πŸ‘ 14    πŸ” 13    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

> We aren’t raising children for a world without algorithms. We are raising them for a world shaped by artificial intelligence, public visibility and constant comparison. Removing access doesn’t build resilience, judgment or self-regulation. It simply […]

Read it at:

www.wsj.com/opinion/if-t...

28.02.2026 00:55 β€” πŸ‘ 14    πŸ” 13    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Fog in Channel. Europe cut off.

26.02.2026 08:34 β€” πŸ‘ 58    πŸ” 20    πŸ’¬ 6    πŸ“Œ 0

Possibly you should try and talk to some kids who have been isolated and had a positive experience.

25.02.2026 20:51 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Wow, so much projection.

25.02.2026 20:50 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

"where do you think here is, precisely?"

25.02.2026 20:42 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I regret I don't have time to dig into it right now due to parenting

25.02.2026 20:39 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

ps: the reason they felt isolated in covid lockdown was "removal of choice and agency"

That's why this is the same, but also different.

25.02.2026 20:33 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

"You types?"

Also: how many of the teens are just circumventing the controls?

25.02.2026 20:32 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

You know, when the proposals of new things that they try are simultaneously populist, oppressive, isolationist, driven by moral panic, and disenfranchised the teenage demographic from communication amongst themselves… I'm ok with them not trying those things.

25.02.2026 20:19 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

If it were something like "it's not oppressive to ban women from driving cars, after all they have buses and public transport" - at least in the West people would flip their lids.

25.02.2026 20:16 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0