Yep. How many teenagers do you know on Facebook? New technologies are going to arise and will be adopted because they are more compelling or more open. Teenagers will get better at faking shit or just circumventing it entirely. "Finsta" was years ago. The wheel will turn.
03.03.2026 20:55 β
π 0
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
ps: Go look up the history of the satanic cult moral panic surrounding dungeons and dragons
03.03.2026 20:16 β
π 0
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
I'm not expecting the stupidity to start to unwind *properly* for about 5 years. It will take at least that long for the damage to rack up and people to start suffering and have their reputations harmed by having been associated with it.
03.03.2026 20:15 β
π 1
π 0
π¬ 2
π 0
Yes I am absolutely certain that they will fail. They will certainly try and they will probably kill a few people in the process, but they will fail.
03.03.2026 19:55 β
π 0
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
βGovernments should halt plans to roll out age checks on online services until privacy and security concerns are addressed, hundreds of academics said todayβ
Article: Archived at Via:
βGovernments should halt plans to roll out age checks on online services until privacy and security concerns are addressed, hundreds of academics said todayβ
https://alecmuffett.com/article/147820
#AgeVerification #censorship #surveillance
03.03.2026 12:05 β
π 6
π 8
π¬ 0
π 0
"We called London a war zone and moved to Dubai by mistake"
03.03.2026 08:16 β
π 6129
π 1482
π¬ 85
π 41
#WeAreSwindon
03.03.2026 10:20 β
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
The proliferation of nut sensitivity is the regrettable consequence of a bunch of bad regulation to keep the mass of kids away from nuts as a precautionary measure to "keep them safe".
Hence the metaphor.
02.03.2026 15:04 β
π 0
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
IMPORTANT: this letter in the WSJ is amongst the clearest expressions of wisdom you'll read, re: blanket bans on teen social media access.
We saw this with peanut allergies: early avoidance yields later life-threatening adult reactiveness at scale. Managed exposure during youth prevents harm.
01.03.2026 09:15 β
π 10
π 8
π¬ 0
π 0
Doubtless, but still happy to see the exchanges.
28.02.2026 18:18 β
π 1
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
Absolutely bonkers approach to technology from the House of Lords.
28.02.2026 10:36 β
π 6
π 1
π¬ 0
π 0
Screenshot of amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill with a new clause beginning:
"AI search services safety: offence
(1) It is an offence for the provider of a generative AI search service to allow the
creation, viewing, listening to, sharing, broadcasting or storing, using that service,
of contentβ
(a) that would be illegal content, as defined by section 59 of the Online Safety
Act 2023 ('illegal content' etc),
(b) that would be content that is harmful to children, as defined by section 60
of that Act ('content that is harmful to children'), if the user is a child,"
and with a definition
"(2) For the purposes of this section, a generative AI search service means a deep or
large language model able to generate text, images and other content based on
the data on which they were trained and user prompts."
Baroness Kidron has tabled an amendment that would criminalise most, if not all, general-purpose LLMs bills.parliament.uk/publications...
The offence says "generative AI search service" but there's no search or service element in the definition β just models.
#CPBill #genAI #censorship #techpolicy
27.02.2026 20:52 β
π 11
π 7
π¬ 1
π 2
> We arenβt raising children for a world without algorithms. We are raising them for a world shaped by artificial intelligence, public visibility and constant comparison. Removing access doesnβt build resilience, judgment or self-regulation. It simply [β¦]
Read it at:
www.wsj.com/opinion/if-t...
28.02.2026 00:55 β
π 14
π 13
π¬ 0
π 0
> We arenβt raising children for a world without algorithms. We are raising them for a world shaped by artificial intelligence, public visibility and constant comparison. Removing access doesnβt build resilience, judgment or self-regulation. It simply [β¦]
Read it at:
www.wsj.com/opinion/if-t...
28.02.2026 00:55 β
π 14
π 13
π¬ 0
π 0
Fog in Channel. Europe cut off.
26.02.2026 08:34 β
π 58
π 20
π¬ 6
π 0
Possibly you should try and talk to some kids who have been isolated and had a positive experience.
25.02.2026 20:51 β
π 0
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
Wow, so much projection.
25.02.2026 20:50 β
π 0
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
"where do you think here is, precisely?"
25.02.2026 20:42 β
π 0
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
I regret I don't have time to dig into it right now due to parenting
25.02.2026 20:39 β
π 0
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
ps: the reason they felt isolated in covid lockdown was "removal of choice and agency"
That's why this is the same, but also different.
25.02.2026 20:33 β
π 0
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
"You types?"
Also: how many of the teens are just circumventing the controls?
25.02.2026 20:32 β
π 0
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
You know, when the proposals of new things that they try are simultaneously populist, oppressive, isolationist, driven by moral panic, and disenfranchised the teenage demographic from communication amongst themselves⦠I'm ok with them not trying those things.
25.02.2026 20:19 β
π 0
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
If it were something like "it's not oppressive to ban women from driving cars, after all they have buses and public transport" - at least in the West people would flip their lids.
25.02.2026 20:16 β
π 0
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0