George Lorey's Avatar

George Lorey

@gmanboca.bsky.social

960 Followers  |  2,959 Following  |  16 Posts  |  Joined: 12.11.2024
Posts Following

Posts by George Lorey (@gmanboca.bsky.social)

In football yes. In basketball the Luca trade may be worse.

27.11.2025 21:07 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

I hardly believe my own ears.

FOX host Brian Kilmeade suggests KILLING homeless people.

BRIAN KILMEADE (FOX HOST): Or involuntary lethal injection.

JONES: Yeah.

KILMEADE : Or something. Just kill them.

13.09.2025 02:22 β€” πŸ‘ 1746    πŸ” 1008    πŸ’¬ 522    πŸ“Œ 406
Post image 29.08.2025 16:46 β€” πŸ‘ 14569    πŸ” 5752    πŸ’¬ 463    πŸ“Œ 247

You forgot Hunter’s laptop

01.08.2025 13:00 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

I’ll watch Stephen Colbert wherever he lands.

18.07.2025 13:17 β€” πŸ‘ 15527    πŸ” 3008    πŸ’¬ 763    πŸ“Œ 292
NBC archive footage shows Trump partying with Jeffrey Epstein in 1992
YouTube video by CNBC Television NBC archive footage shows Trump partying with Jeffrey Epstein in 1992

DO NOT STOP TALKING ABOUT THIS AND ASKING QUESTIONS. DO NOT LET THEM FORGET THAT WE ALL KNOW THEY ARE IN ON IT.

17.07.2025 02:18 β€” πŸ‘ 918    πŸ” 530    πŸ’¬ 45    πŸ“Œ 22

@jaketapper.bsky.social πŸ–•πŸΌπŸͺ³

17.07.2025 16:27 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 15.07.2025 11:24 β€” πŸ‘ 20569    πŸ” 3175    πŸ’¬ 729    πŸ“Œ 270
Video thumbnail

John Leguizamo: "We feed this country, we serve this country, we build this country, and then we get treated this way."

06.07.2025 21:43 β€” πŸ‘ 16150    πŸ” 4428    πŸ’¬ 436    πŸ“Œ 219
Video thumbnail

ICE crossed a line in LA

08.06.2025 12:42 β€” πŸ‘ 24792    πŸ” 12018    πŸ’¬ 794    πŸ“Œ 1361
Post image Post image

🍿 🍿

05.06.2025 19:23 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Whoa, saying he cooked here is understating it. He delivered the facts coldly and calmly. Mad respect.

05.06.2025 03:01 β€” πŸ‘ 71    πŸ” 18    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 3
Post image

We have a president who virtually never thinks rationally, logically, or even in sequential steps. Nor can he fully comprehend causes and effects. His base of knowledge on virtually all subjects relating to governance and economics and world affairs is minimal. (1/2)

24.05.2025 13:22 β€” πŸ‘ 12249    πŸ” 3438    πŸ’¬ 639    πŸ“Œ 163
Video thumbnail

Pritzker: Time to stop wondering if you can trust the nuclear codes to people who don’t know how to organize a group chat. It’s time to stop ignoring the hypocrisy in wearing a big gold cross while announcing the defunding of children’s cancer research…

28.04.2025 19:41 β€” πŸ‘ 44374    πŸ” 13847    πŸ’¬ 988    πŸ“Œ 986
Video thumbnail

worth every second

28.04.2025 17:37 β€” πŸ‘ 25756    πŸ” 6923    πŸ’¬ 1338    πŸ“Œ 810
Post image

Rick Scott urges people not to buy the Trump Bible and most MAGA merch.

25.04.2025 17:27 β€” πŸ‘ 5108    πŸ” 1053    πŸ’¬ 249    πŸ“Œ 41

Streetwise?

25.04.2025 21:50 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

β€œto late”. What a f*****g moron

21.04.2025 14:09 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
The examination into the incident in which rescue teams and vehicles were struck in the Gaza Strip by IDF troops' fire was conducted by the General Staff Fact Finding Mechanism.
The examination included extensive data collection from operational systems, the forces on the ground, and along the entire chain of command. This included debriefings conducted by units in the field, in the division, and in the Southern Command, as well as relevant operational orders and directives, footage from various surveillance systems active during the event, and radio recordings. Additionally, the event was reconstructed in the field, and relevant operational personnel were questioned. The examination was conducted by a senior and professional team within the Mechanism, separate from the operational chain of command, with full backing from the Chief of the General Staff to perform all necessary actions to uncover the truth.
The findings show that the incident occurred in a hostile and dangerous combat zone, under a widespread threat to the operating troops. The backdrop of the incident is the challenge and the responsibility of the IDF to respect and protect medical teams and facilities carrying out their duties, while also confronting Hamas' repeated use of such infrastructure for terrorism, including using ambulances to transport terrorists and weapons.
The examination found no evidence to support claims of execution or that any of the deceased were bound before or after the shooting. Such claims are blood libels and false accusations against IDF soldiers.

Throughout the operation, vehicles and ambulances moved along the route without obstruction, since the forces did not perceive any threat posed by them. The forces also apprehended two pedestrians who raised suspicion, and released them subsequently. This indicates that the troops did not engage in indiscriminate fire but remained alert to respond to real threats identified by them.

The examination into the incident in which rescue teams and vehicles were struck in the Gaza Strip by IDF troops' fire was conducted by the General Staff Fact Finding Mechanism. The examination included extensive data collection from operational systems, the forces on the ground, and along the entire chain of command. This included debriefings conducted by units in the field, in the division, and in the Southern Command, as well as relevant operational orders and directives, footage from various surveillance systems active during the event, and radio recordings. Additionally, the event was reconstructed in the field, and relevant operational personnel were questioned. The examination was conducted by a senior and professional team within the Mechanism, separate from the operational chain of command, with full backing from the Chief of the General Staff to perform all necessary actions to uncover the truth. The findings show that the incident occurred in a hostile and dangerous combat zone, under a widespread threat to the operating troops. The backdrop of the incident is the challenge and the responsibility of the IDF to respect and protect medical teams and facilities carrying out their duties, while also confronting Hamas' repeated use of such infrastructure for terrorism, including using ambulances to transport terrorists and weapons. The examination found no evidence to support claims of execution or that any of the deceased were bound before or after the shooting. Such claims are blood libels and false accusations against IDF soldiers. Throughout the operation, vehicles and ambulances moved along the route without obstruction, since the forces did not perceive any threat posed by them. The forces also apprehended two pedestrians who raised suspicion, and released them subsequently. This indicates that the troops did not engage in indiscriminate fire but remained alert to respond to real threats identified by them.

There were three shooting incidents on that day:
First incident - The troops fired at a vehicle identified as a Hamas vehicle. Following this, the troops remained on high alert for further potential threats.
Second incident - Approximately an hour later, the troops opened fire on suspects emerging from a fire truck and ambulances very close to the area in which the troops were operating, after perceiving an immediate and tangible threat. Supporting surveillance had reported five vehicles approaching rapidly and stopping near the troops, with passengers quickly disembarking. The deputy battalion commander assessed the vehicles as employed by Hamas forces, who arrived to assist the first vehicle's passengers.
Under this impression and sense of threat, he ordered to open fire. Fifteen Palestinians were killed, six of whom were identified in a retrospective examination as Hamas terrorists. Due to poor night visibility, the deputy commander did not initially recognize the vehicles as ambulances. Only later, after approaching the vehicles and scanning them, was it discovered that these were indeed rescue teams.
Third incident - About 15 minutes later, the troops fired at a Palestinian UN vehicle due to operational errors in breach of regulations The troops' commander initially reported the event, and additional details emerged later in the examination.
The body removal and vehicle crushing were carried out by field commanders. The examination concluded that removing the bodies was reasonable under the circumstances, but the decision to crush the vehicles was wrong. In general, there was no attempt to conceal the event, which was discussed with international organizations and the UN, including coordination for the removal of bodies.
The examination determined that the fire in the first two incidents resulted from an operational misunderstanding by the troops, who believed they faced a tangible threat from enemy forces. The third incident involved a breach of orders.

There were three shooting incidents on that day: First incident - The troops fired at a vehicle identified as a Hamas vehicle. Following this, the troops remained on high alert for further potential threats. Second incident - Approximately an hour later, the troops opened fire on suspects emerging from a fire truck and ambulances very close to the area in which the troops were operating, after perceiving an immediate and tangible threat. Supporting surveillance had reported five vehicles approaching rapidly and stopping near the troops, with passengers quickly disembarking. The deputy battalion commander assessed the vehicles as employed by Hamas forces, who arrived to assist the first vehicle's passengers. Under this impression and sense of threat, he ordered to open fire. Fifteen Palestinians were killed, six of whom were identified in a retrospective examination as Hamas terrorists. Due to poor night visibility, the deputy commander did not initially recognize the vehicles as ambulances. Only later, after approaching the vehicles and scanning them, was it discovered that these were indeed rescue teams. Third incident - About 15 minutes later, the troops fired at a Palestinian UN vehicle due to operational errors in breach of regulations The troops' commander initially reported the event, and additional details emerged later in the examination. The body removal and vehicle crushing were carried out by field commanders. The examination concluded that removing the bodies was reasonable under the circumstances, but the decision to crush the vehicles was wrong. In general, there was no attempt to conceal the event, which was discussed with international organizations and the UN, including coordination for the removal of bodies. The examination determined that the fire in the first two incidents resulted from an operational misunderstanding by the troops, who believed they faced a tangible threat from enemy forces. The third incident involved a breach of orders.

He affirmed that the Golani Reconnaissance Battalion is a professional and high-quality battalion that has been operating with great distinction for a year and a half.
Alongside this, the examination identified several professional failures, breaches of orders, and a failure to fully report the incident.
The Chief of the General Staff and the Commanding Officer of the Southern Command accepted the examination's findings. The Chief of the General Staff accepted the Commanding Officer of the Southern Command's recommendation on the following command measures:
The Commanding Officer of the 14th Brigade will receive a reprimand, which will be recorded in his personal file, for his overall responsibility for the incident, including the procedure of combat and management of the scene afterward.
The deputy commander of the Golani Reconnaissance Battalion will be dismissed from his position due to his responsibilities as the field commander in this incident and for providing an incomplete and inaccurate report during the debrief.
The commanders emphasized that the deputy commander of the Golani Reconnaissance Battalion is a highly respected officer, whose military service and personal story reflect a spirit of combat, volunteerism, and great dedication. Following October 7th, he returned from abroad to serve in reserve duty, continued to operate in Gaza until he was injured in the combat, and returned to service after his recovery. Over the past six months, he was on active reserve duty and served as the battalion's deputy commander.
The IDF regrets the harm caused to uninvolved civilians. The examination process also serves as part of an ongoing effort to learn from operational incidents and reduce the likelihood of similar occurrences in the future. Existing protocols have been clarified and reinforced - emphasizing the need for heightened caution when operating near rescue forces and medical personnel, even in high-intensity combat zones.

He affirmed that the Golani Reconnaissance Battalion is a professional and high-quality battalion that has been operating with great distinction for a year and a half. Alongside this, the examination identified several professional failures, breaches of orders, and a failure to fully report the incident. The Chief of the General Staff and the Commanding Officer of the Southern Command accepted the examination's findings. The Chief of the General Staff accepted the Commanding Officer of the Southern Command's recommendation on the following command measures: The Commanding Officer of the 14th Brigade will receive a reprimand, which will be recorded in his personal file, for his overall responsibility for the incident, including the procedure of combat and management of the scene afterward. The deputy commander of the Golani Reconnaissance Battalion will be dismissed from his position due to his responsibilities as the field commander in this incident and for providing an incomplete and inaccurate report during the debrief. The commanders emphasized that the deputy commander of the Golani Reconnaissance Battalion is a highly respected officer, whose military service and personal story reflect a spirit of combat, volunteerism, and great dedication. Following October 7th, he returned from abroad to serve in reserve duty, continued to operate in Gaza until he was injured in the combat, and returned to service after his recovery. Over the past six months, he was on active reserve duty and served as the battalion's deputy commander. The IDF regrets the harm caused to uninvolved civilians. The examination process also serves as part of an ongoing effort to learn from operational incidents and reduce the likelihood of similar occurrences in the future. Existing protocols have been clarified and reinforced - emphasizing the need for heightened caution when operating near rescue forces and medical personnel, even in high-intensity combat zones.

1. NEWS

The Israeli Defense Forces have released a statement sharing the military organization’s findings from an investigation into the killing of 15 emergency workers in Gaza.

This is the statement in its entirety.

20.04.2025 16:27 β€” πŸ‘ 95    πŸ” 29    πŸ’¬ 9    πŸ“Œ 5
Volodymyr Zelenskyy: The 2025 60 Minutes Interview
YouTube video by 60 Minutes Volodymyr Zelenskyy: The 2025 60 Minutes Interview

Last night's 60 Minutes segment with Volodymyr Zelenskyy was some powerful television.

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

14.04.2025 13:42 β€” πŸ‘ 543    πŸ” 189    πŸ’¬ 8    πŸ“Œ 9

Rory has won 5 majors and numerous other titles. Is arguably the greatest European golfer ever. Golf at that level is incredibly hard and competitive. Definitely no choke gene in him.

14.04.2025 15:27 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Hegseth will never resign and he won’t get fired. Would be admitting mistakes. Can’t do that.

26.03.2025 16:00 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 20.03.2025 12:00 β€” πŸ‘ 14462    πŸ” 3455    πŸ’¬ 1144    πŸ“Œ 442
Preview
Tesla Recalls Every Single Cybertruck Over Stainless Steel Trims Falling Off | Carscoops 151 Cybertruck owners filed warranty claims after noticing the roof trim panel above the windows was coming loose

Tesla has recalled... every single Cybertruck. Every one they've ever sold. For a hardware issue

www.carscoops.com/2025/03/tesl...

20.03.2025 12:56 β€” πŸ‘ 26421    πŸ” 6968    πŸ’¬ 1721    πŸ“Œ 1722

Please resign!

15.03.2025 19:06 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

A Christian?

13.03.2025 10:16 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 06.03.2025 11:29 β€” πŸ‘ 21000    πŸ” 6965    πŸ’¬ 1789    πŸ“Œ 728

How could anyone ever vote for this ignorant fool.

04.03.2025 11:25 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Did he ask Elon the same question?

28.02.2025 19:21 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

His poor little baby hands

26.02.2025 12:58 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0