The white makes the painting seem brighter - a tad.
02.03.2026 00:10 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The white makes the painting seem brighter - a tad.
02.03.2026 00:10 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I haven't seen very many of his painting live, but I have seen a few. It's an eye opener to do so! People think they are just rectangles painted on a background, but there is way more subtlety in them than I expected. If you ever get the chance, study his painting up close in real life.
01.03.2026 01:55 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I fully agree! However our President lies so much that I don't think he could tell the truth, even under oath in a court.
27.02.2026 02:52 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Definitely not a Rothko, but I like the tribute to him in your own way!
27.02.2026 02:48 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Testing out the new Alexa AI to see how good it was with the concept of abstract art... "Take the old song "Old McDonald Had a Farm" and translate it into multi color lines, swirls, twists, and other painterly movements. Put into one painting that has action, balance, and rhythm."
26.02.2026 01:30 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I've learned a lot of that through trial and error. This article is right on point!
25.02.2026 01:25 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Subtle abstract!!! We don't see that very often! Cool!
25.02.2026 00:49 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Not abstract, but still beautiful.
24.02.2026 01:07 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Why are the big rocks in the lower part of the picture completely different in the two pictures? I suspect that AI wasn't paying attention. Nothing in nature would make those differences in a change of two seasons.
22.02.2026 00:56 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I would think that running with a top like that would be energetic and entertaining, but might get a bit sore.
14.02.2026 22:02 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Something red flowing from that area is a bit funny and out of context a bit.
14.02.2026 21:58 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Well, that's my point. Why use a moving medium for something that doesn't move. Actually it was confusing; my thought was "what's wrong with this video?" That took away the focus on the art and focus on what looks like a screwed up presentation.
30.01.2026 01:56 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Just audio, no video!
29.01.2026 00:33 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Who burnt the hotdogs?!?
26.01.2026 23:56 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I stopped scrolling and looked at this for a bit. Then I move on. However, it stuck in my head and I had to scroll back to it. I'm still not sure why, but it clicks something in my mind.
20.01.2026 22:15 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0It looks like "Almost Many Things", but not quite anything.
20.01.2026 22:09 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Not very abstract at all, but it really looks like it would make a very nice wallpaper in the right place.
20.01.2026 22:07 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0So much for freedom of the press.
18.01.2026 18:01 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0There goes Freedom of the Press!
18.01.2026 17:06 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Well, there goes freedom of the Press!
18.01.2026 17:03 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Whatever you want it to be!
18.01.2026 16:57 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Good abstract art with a very creative way of displaying it! ❤️
17.01.2026 00:10 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Not the classic definition of "abstract," more like surreal, but it's pretty cool!
17.01.2026 00:07 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Ruined by the text!
16.01.2026 00:01 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I would think that two artists working together one work would be a nightmare, particularly if they didn't know each other, didn't work in the same medium or style, and didn't let them decide if they wanted to work with each other. 😜
06.01.2026 23:56 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Beautiful stylized waves, but not abstract.
03.01.2026 21:47 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I recently got one of these and absolutely love it!
01.01.2026 23:24 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0That was very interesting and a fun experiment.
01.01.2026 22:56 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0