So... Why did you put this in the Abstract Art group?
05.11.2025 19:57 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0@lughclyde.bsky.social
Abstract artist, atheist, liberal, husband, grandfather...
So... Why did you put this in the Abstract Art group?
05.11.2025 19:57 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0It's not abstract art.
01.11.2025 23:16 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Not abstract art at all!
26.10.2025 00:03 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0What makes it "Saturday"?
26.10.2025 00:02 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0He doesn't care about ANYONE but himself!!! What you, I, or anyone else thinks or says is irrelevant to him.
24.10.2025 22:38 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I wouldn't say that it's really abstract, but I like it anyway.
24.10.2025 22:34 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0That would bother me because it doesn't have the structure of a feather.
02.10.2025 01:40 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0What?!? My personal files in Drive don't deserve protections too?
30.09.2025 23:57 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Sorry, a mix up in images.
25.09.2025 23:15 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Do you not understand "Art that does not depict a recognizable subject"? The photo certainly represents a recognizable subject.
25.09.2025 23:13 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0Definition (Oxford Learner's Dictionary): A style of art, especially painting and sculpture, that uses shapes, lines, and color and does not represent real people or things.
25.09.2025 23:08 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Definition (Oxford Learner's Dictionary): A style of art, especially painting and sculpture, that uses shapes, lines, and color and does not represent real people or things.
25.09.2025 23:08 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Definition (Oxford Learner's Dictionary): A style of art, especially painting and sculpture, that uses shapes, lines, and color and does not represent real people or things.
25.09.2025 23:06 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Definition (Oxford Learner's Dictionary): A style of art, especially painting and sculpture, that uses shapes, lines, and color and does not represent real people or things.
25.09.2025 23:05 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Abstract Art:
Definition (Merriam-Webster): Art that does not depict a recognizable subject but instead uses line, color, and form to create a composition that can exist for its own sake.
This isn't abstract art at all. Cool though.
25.09.2025 22:33 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Very beautiful, but not abstract at all.
25.09.2025 22:20 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Who is to say it isn't both?
21.09.2025 22:48 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0In 1966 kids didn't know about or think about computers. i.e. AI generated.
21.09.2025 22:30 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0No Kings!!!
21.09.2025 22:25 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0We Americans agree and don't blame you in the least! Would you be willing to take a few million of us? Alas, I know you won't. <sigh>
19.09.2025 21:50 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0AI didn't really get how water flows from a source, but interesting.
19.09.2025 21:07 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Very pretty, but AI isn't very good at getting the lighting correct. The light on the leopards and the trees is from the right, but the full moon is from straight back.
19.09.2025 20:55 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Uh! Not abstract at all!
16.09.2025 23:03 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0I use ChromeOS - only. It does everything I need. OK, it doesn't do heavy AI locally, but better AI can be done on websites. Then again, I really don't do heavy AI work anyway and don't have much need to do it either.
16.09.2025 22:57 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0The bow string going through her breat looks painful and disturbing.
15.09.2025 23:03 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0A butterfly in the eye would hurt! Disturbing!
15.09.2025 22:57 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0What's the translation?
15.09.2025 22:45 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0It's not abstract art!
15.09.2025 22:37 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0We have a standing army because we are constantly at war somewhere in the world.
10.09.2025 23:26 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0