's Avatar

@jodes99.bsky.social

67 Followers  |  295 Following  |  16 Posts  |  Joined: 07.10.2024
Posts Following

Posts by (@jodes99.bsky.social)

β€˜MmmNndv?

03.01.2026 18:12 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ“Œ

09.09.2025 15:27 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

And yet another 'investment' that was signaled in 2019, before the current governments changes

04.09.2025 02:08 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ“Œ

16.05.2025 08:30 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ“Œ

27.04.2025 22:54 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ“Œ

13.04.2025 02:21 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ“Œ

10.04.2025 07:09 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Our Prime Minister is a moral vacuum, a spineless weasel, an ineffectual hypocrite, an incompetent fool #nzpol

14.03.2025 00:33 β€” πŸ‘ 112    πŸ” 12    πŸ’¬ 13    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ“Œ

05.03.2025 08:20 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ“Œ

07.02.2025 09:05 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ“Œ

23.01.2025 18:10 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Sorry for delay - been away. I have seen in other posts that the pin emoji when relying is used in place of the bookmark option.

13.01.2025 20:22 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Why the Regulatory Standards Bill is a Very Bad Idea The individualism and private property protection Bill David Seymour’s proposed Regulatory Standards Bill seeks to give primacy to two things: individualism and private property. Those two things are ...

An excellent explainer about the Regulatory Standards Bill, the assumptions that underpin it and why it's such a dangerous piece of legislation.
#nzpol

02.01.2025 03:59 β€” πŸ‘ 61    πŸ” 32    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 2

There are 21 million Black people in the US.

Fewer than 6% of us earn over $100K a year.

The median net worth of Black households fluctuates between about $20K and $40K, depending on how much scamming happens that year (eg crypto, asset forfeiture).

Black. People. Are. The. Working. Class.

29.12.2024 22:13 β€” πŸ‘ 1097    πŸ” 316    πŸ’¬ 15    πŸ“Œ 33

πŸ“Œ

29.12.2024 02:45 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Daily reminder that the underlying purpose of AI is to allow wealth to access skill while removing from the skilled the ability to access wealth.

26.12.2024 20:34 β€” πŸ‘ 12389    πŸ” 5016    πŸ’¬ 73    πŸ“Œ 109

Yeah. This is the law functioning as intended. Comfortable with my initial view here that the primary problem is the law itself, not police interpretation of it (though that can certainly also be criticised; in particular they ARE required to take account of bill of rights free expression rights).

28.12.2024 07:48 β€” πŸ‘ 21    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ“Œ

28.11.2024 08:19 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ“Œ

15.11.2024 23:07 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ“Œ

14.11.2024 21:38 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ“Œ

11.11.2024 19:58 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0