Part 2 of Agressive Agility: Learn from your opponents' cleverest tactic! And turn it on them.
Aggressive agility. It's called _judo,_ and Democrats stink at it.
Last time (in Part One), I described a clever tactic that Republicans used, in the 90s, to flip the entire Democratic coalition that was built by the Greatest (GI Bill) Generation onto its ass, commencing thirty years of all-out war against America by a newly-amplified and mutated GOP.
That tactic - Newt Gingrich's _Republican Contract With America -_ struck wavering U.S. citizens (just two years after overwhelmingly electing Democrats) as reformist and reasonable...
...in part because many of its provisions _were_ reasonable-seeming! Whereupon, in classic bait-n-switch, the GOP flushed them all away. Getting power was all that ever mattered to them. Or that has mattered to them, since.
So, this time, let's dive into a historical document that _I doubt any of you have ever read._ Let alone studied for potential tactical lessons. And we have been suffering from that lazy neglect for more than a generation.
Later, in Part Three, we'll open the floor for potential ways that Democrats and decent independents may _stop trying to use sumo against judo users!_ Ways we can adapt. And win.
**PONDERING A “NEWER DEAL FOR _AMERICA"_**
**__**
**_Part Two_**** __**
**_Examining the 1994 Gingrich “Contract”_**
** _
_**
Polls show that average American citizens tend to prefer mainstream Democratic _policies_ , such as government transparency, accountability, science & energy research, improved efficiency, moderate environmentalism, assistance to poor children _,_ tolerance of individual diversity, a _far_ better track record of economic outcomes, and responsible attention to our alliances and international affairs. The rich paying their share. And did I mention science? All of them far more helpful to the nation and humanity than the _symbolism obsessions_ of either the entire gone-mad right ... or a net-unhelpful farthest-left.
__
__
_Nevertheless_ , the Republican Party has developed politically innovative tactics to overcome these policy disadvantages, in order to win one victory after another. These tactics range from open policy initiatives that sincere people might legitimately argue about... to maligning Rooseveltean liberals as “Marxists”... all the way to corruption of both mass media and voting processes and outright theft of trillions, to create wealth disparities worse even than pre-Revolutionary France.
Although many of their techniques are despicable – such as fomenting racism and culture war and attacking every fact profession – _it is simply dumb not to study_ the tenacity and determination that these innovations represent! Indeed, a few of the less-dishonorable Republican tactics may merit the highest tribute -- imitation.
Take the _Republican Contract with America,_ that we discussed in Part One. Newt Gingrich and the first wave of neocons used it with startling effectiveness, during their 1994 drive to seize control of Congress. By offering a primly laid-out “deal” to voters, they gave an impression that clearcut and measurable changes would be delivered, if only the GOP were given control. Implicitly implied: Democratic Party leadership had been degenerate and wicked.
Also implicit? A willing acceptance of _punishment,_ if the Contract's promises weren’t kept!
Given the “Contract’s” political effectiveness. Ought we give that prodigiously successful tactic attention and study?
**II. Let's examine the Republican Contract with America**
**Here it is.** You may not have read the text, back then. But it merits study by anyone interested in the art of politics. Then compare it to my own proposed draft for a 2025 "Democratic Newest Deal" to follow.
The contract listed _eight reforms_ that Republicans promised to enact _within_ Congress itself, followed by _ten bills_ they promised to bring to floor debate and votes to become laws. All were "60% issues" that garnered support from 60%+ of polled Americans, and thus they avoided divisive matters like abortion and school prayer.
Note: actual verbiage from the 1994 Contract is in **serif type face.**
**THE REPUBLICAN CONTRACT WITH AMERICA**
As Republican Members of the House of Representatives and as citizens seeking to join that body, we propose not just to change its policies, but even more important, to restore the bonds of trust between the people and their elected representatives. That is why, in this era of official evasion and posturing, we offer instead a detailed agenda for national renewal, a written commitment with no fine print.
_(For the full preamble, see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contract_with_America)_
On the first day of the 104th Congress, the new Republican majority will immediately pass the following major reforms (of Congress itself), aimed at restoring the faith and trust of the American people in their government.
**PART ONE – They proposed to reform Congressional rules and procedures, in ways that sound virtuous:******
* FIRST, require all laws that apply to the rest of the country also apply equally to the Congress;
* SECOND, select a major, independent auditing firm to conduct a comprehensive audit of Congress for waste, fraud or abuse;
* THIRD, cut the number of House committees, and cut committee staff by one-third;
* FOURTH, limit the terms of all committee chairs;
* FIFTH, ban the casting of proxy votes in committee;
* SIXTH, require committee meetings to be open to the public;
* SEVENTH, require a three-fifths majority vote to pass a tax increase;
* EIGHTH, guarantee an honest accounting of our Federal Budget by implementing zero base-line budgeting.
**PART TWO – Here they listed bills and new laws to enact Republican priorities, also in ways that sounded virtuous.**
****
**Thereafter** , within the first 100 days of the 104th Congress, we shall bring to the House Floor the following bills, each to be given full and open debate, each to be given a clear and fair vote and each to be immediately available this day for public inspection and scrutiny.
1. THE FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY ACT: A balanced budget/tax limitation amendment and a legislative line-item veto to restore fiscal responsibility to an out- of-control Congress, requiring them to live under the same budget constraints as families and businesses.
2. THE TAKING BACK OUR STREETS ACT: An anti-crime package including stronger truth-in- sentencing, "good faith" exclusionary rule exemptions, effective death penalty provisions, and cuts in social spending from this summer's "crime" bill to fund prison construction and additional law enforcement to keep people secure in their neighborhoods and kids safe in their schools.
3. THE PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY ACT: Discourage illegitimacy and teen pregnancy by prohibiting welfare to minor mothers and denying increased AFDC for additional children while on welfare, cut spending for welfare programs, and enact a tough two-years-and-out provision with work requirements to promote individual responsibility.
4. THE FAMILY REINFORCEMENT ACT: Child support enforcement, tax incentives for adoption, strengthening rights of parents in their children's education, stronger child pornography laws, and an elderly dependent care tax credit to reinforce the central role of families in American society.
5. THE AMERICAN DREAM RESTORATION ACT: A S500 per child tax credit, begin repeal of the marriage tax penalty, and creation of American Dream Savings Accounts to provide middle class tax relief. (Bill Text) (Description)
6. THE NATIONAL SECURITY RESTORATION ACT: No U.S. troops under U.N. command and restoration of the essential parts of our national security funding to strengthen our national defense and maintain our credibility around the world.
7. THE SENIOR CITIZENS FAIRNESS ACT: Raise the Social Security earnings limit which currently forces seniors out of the work force, repeal the 1993 tax hikes on Social Security benefits and provide tax incentives for private long-term care insurance to let Older Americans keep more of what they have earned over the years.
8. THE JOB CREATION AND WAGE ENHANCEMENT ACT: Small business incentives, capital gains cut and indexation, neutral cost recovery, risk assessment/cost-benefit analysis, strengthening the Regulatory Flexibility Act and unfunded mandate reform to create jobs and raise worker wages.
9. THE COMMON SENSE LEGAL REFORM ACT: "Loser pays" laws, reasonable limits on punitive damages and reform of product liability laws to stem the endless tide of litigation.
10. THE CITIZEN LEGISLATURE ACT: A first-ever vote on term limits to replace career politicians with citizen legislators. (Description)
Further, we will instruct the House Budget Committee to report to the floor and we will work to enact additional budget savings, beyond the budget cuts specifically included in the legislation described above, to ensure that the Federal budget deficit will be less than it would have been without the enactment of these bills.
******Okay, there it is,** the ingenious document that set in motion a dramatic turnaround in fortunes for the Republican Party. Yes, some - (many?) – parts were despicable dog whistles! But if you are _only_ able to look upon it with loathing, incapable of appreciating its artful skill… or the reasons why it appealed to American swing voters in 1994 … then you have only proved that you are too politically blinkered -- too channeled by reflex hostility -- to see things in a broader perspective.
There is so much to examine!
**Take the first section on Congressional rules and procedures.** Here, the majority party in each house has almost total power, constrained only by tradition… and by knowledge that someday they will take their own turn as the minority. Twin constraints that – as of autumn 2025 – no longer seem to concern the House GOP in the slightest. But Speaker Mike Johnson’s complicity with despotism is not the topic here. Rather we are talking about the _Contract._ Its terms and execution.
Of the eight proposed reforms, items labeled THIRD and SEVENTH are rightwing ideological. Number THREE was a continuation of Newt’s banishment of the Office of Technology Assessment and all in-house experts who might say the words that GOP politicians hate most to hear: _“That’s not actually true.”_ A campaign against all facts and fact users that continues to accelerate, today.
Number SEVEN accurately reflected Conservative wishes, hoping eventually to shift Social Security into buying stocks that are held mostly by rich Republicans. In order to make them much, much richer.
_The other six were things that almost any decent citizen might deem reasonable…_
…and not one of the eight was passed or enforced with any degree of alacrity. Every single one of the in-house reforms was betrayed. And Dems never made an issue of that betrayal.
**The second section** of the Contract was a mélange of attempts at _legislation_. And hence, the Republicans needed not just a House majority but – for Senate passage – either a filibuster-proof 60 votes, or else a compromise achieved by negotiation with Democrats. Note that Hastert’s “Never Negotiate!” rule was still a year or two in the future. But there was one more obstacle… _the veto pen of President Bill Clinton_.
I won’t go into details here. You can see capsule summaries of the aftermath, the vetoes – with some over-rides – and yes, some negotiated compromises (since the GOP Speaker was still Newt) – in the Contract’s Wikipedia page.
Again, these bills ranged from things that I (and most Democrats or decent/thoughtful people) would deem _detestable_ … all the way to some that aimed in general directions that one could reasonably negotiate. Indeed, as I said earlier, Newt _did_ negotiate a bit with Clinton, amid volcanic partisan-tirades, and there were several effective reforms... that resulted in Newt's ouster by his own party!
_
_
_And that’s not the point!_ The point is that most of the ten were either aimed at augmenting oligarchy… or else betrayed, just like the in-house rule reforms. The net-overall effects were pretty damned meagre.
**A pause to acknowledge that both parties have since then rushed through major omnibus ‘reform’ bills.** The 2025 Republican “Big Beautiful Bill” was a heaping mountain of oligarchic gifts and outright treasons. The 2021-22 “Pelosi Bills” like the Infrastructure Act were vastly more admirable and I deem it borderline criminal the way our own left treated her – and mainstream Dem-pols – after they accomplished so much. (See this!) And yes, I sure am partisan. I hate the fact that I am compelled to be! But like the 1860s earlier phase of the same civil war, I choose blue because it is the only side with sanity and decency.
Right now, all I ask of you is to squint and consider the _tactical effectiveness_ of the “Contract.” Its gambit at feigning sober-pragmatic sincerity and making plausible promises, while implying the other side is a corrupt morass.
**Next time,** let’s ponder what it might look like, if we actually study the adversary’s best tactics, so we can use even better ones! And offer our own list of priorities that we intend to fulfill. For the sake of us all.
Part 2 of Agressive Agility: Learn from your opponents' cleverest tactic! And turn it on them. Aggressive agility. It's called judo, and Democrats stink at it. Last time ( in Part One ), ...
#contract #with #america #judo #politics #New #contract #with #America
Origin | Interest | Match
