I’ve owned a one way ratchet. It won’t move in the other direction but as the poster admits, sometimes prices do. So they can’t be a one way ratchet.
09.11.2025 14:32 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@raggededge.bsky.social
What you see depends upon where you stand. We are all god’s imperfect children on this planet of broken toys.
I’ve owned a one way ratchet. It won’t move in the other direction but as the poster admits, sometimes prices do. So they can’t be a one way ratchet.
09.11.2025 14:32 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0You really think so? 🙄
09.11.2025 14:28 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Shows you how long Rethuglicans have been running that whole trickle down/supply side scam.
08.11.2025 15:14 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Since snap pays for food, and food is grown by farmers, you have to ask why Trump hates farmers as much as he likes starving the poor.
08.11.2025 15:06 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Well then maybe that Mellon guy who stepped up to pay the military salaries, or the world’s richest man who holds election lotteries, or the donors to the nation’s new ballroom etc would be willing to cover. Or some crypto billionaires. Or Peter antichrist Thiel. Plenty of money sloshing around.
08.11.2025 15:01 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I’m thinking his answer is yes?
08.11.2025 14:52 — 👍 1 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0The opposite of “woke” isn’t asleep, it’s “fascist.”
08.11.2025 00:28 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The quislings should be prosecuted.
07.11.2025 18:24 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Unless consumers stop buying because supply is dwindling, input costs are rising and prices are spiking, as may be happening with the US food supply.
07.11.2025 18:22 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0The fascist purge in the military continues apace.
07.11.2025 16:53 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0If the Dems regain power they will first have to treat the entire executive branch as a crime scene.
07.11.2025 16:43 — 👍 5 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0Which is the problem on the dem side in general. On any given issue you only need to buy off a few Dems for the other side to get it’s way. So the party can stand for proposition X, but ya know, Dem Senator so and so gets a lot of money from say pharma.
07.11.2025 16:10 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Too busy working on another book about Biden.
07.11.2025 15:11 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0So according to the VP who went Yale Law School, there is no separation of powers and the executive does what it wants regardless of court rulings? This is profoundly unconstitutional.
07.11.2025 14:56 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Wow! What a great in depth article that reveals so much about Trump. Kudos to the NYT, uh sorry, CineMontage, for reporting it.
07.11.2025 14:48 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Wow. Thanks for this!
07.11.2025 14:31 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Pretty awful implications for AIs if they are programmed to initiate actions on info that is incorrect.
07.11.2025 14:24 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Oligarchs don’t like tariffs.
06.11.2025 19:00 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0This is s great thread, Thanks for taking the time!
06.11.2025 15:55 — 👍 7 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0All I saw was “BREAKING: the United States economy”
06.11.2025 15:32 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0As if there were a lack of issues and not a lack of leaders raising them.
06.11.2025 00:40 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0So Raskin needs to talk like he knows people don’t know what “monarchist mercantilism” is or why it’s bad. Ffs, Dems, talk like real people.
05.11.2025 18:31 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Our greatest military strategist! To think they tried to draft him during the Vietnam War instead of recognizing his inherent natural military genius and putting him in charge of the military.
05.11.2025 18:28 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Who on the Dem side is there to make these suggestions to? Is anybody coordinating marcomm?
05.11.2025 18:22 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Is kicking back a percentage of their past contract awards to fund construction of an ostensively public building socialism or corruption?
03.11.2025 21:33 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I’ve read the Republican healthplan. Here it is: 🖕
03.11.2025 17:00 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The network state sucks balls.
02.11.2025 21:56 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0And slightly off point, I’m betting he’s having trouble scheduling because he’s been problematic to schedule.
02.11.2025 21:26 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I would have thought the unwoke blueprint for “anti-woke venture capital” is simply more venture capital.
02.11.2025 21:24 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Yeah but sometimes what he says, lunatic ravings or not, matter.
02.11.2025 21:17 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0