JustJeni's Avatar

JustJeni

@justjeni.bsky.social

πŸ’™πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆπŸΎπŸŒœπŸ“·πŸ€ͺ Love animals. Blue dot in Oklahoma.

217 Followers  |  216 Following  |  31 Posts  |  Joined: 14.11.2024  |  1.6771

Latest posts by justjeni.bsky.social on Bluesky

Stuck on break in the break room with a Boomer who the only thing he watches in this millennium is Fox News. Currently Gunsmoke in black & white. πŸ™„

11.05.2025 00:19 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Chuck Schumer is a Coward. I said what I said.

14.03.2025 21:18 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Share if you agree. πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ πŸ‡²πŸ‡½

09.03.2025 13:03 β€” πŸ‘ 49214    πŸ” 13882    πŸ’¬ 1912    πŸ“Œ 746
Preview
Cassie Brayman on Substack Discover and discuss great writing with the world’s smartest readers on Substack.

substack.com/@brutallyhon...

05.02.2025 10:49 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Trump will overplay his hand. Be ready for when he does. Friends,

open.substack.com/pub/robertre...

22.01.2025 08:44 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

You can't just say "Goddammit!" and expect Me to damn it. There's a procedure. File the paperwork.

20.12.2024 05:00 β€” πŸ‘ 6040    πŸ” 756    πŸ’¬ 220    πŸ“Œ 52

If the government shuts down Saturday, the richest man in the world will be largely to blame.

You may not get access to services you depend on just before the holidays because an unelected billionaire shadow president wanted it that way.

If this isn’t oligarchy, I don’t know what is.

19.12.2024 21:00 β€” πŸ‘ 26409    πŸ” 8433    πŸ’¬ 913    πŸ“Œ 402
Post image Post image

lol

15.12.2024 16:23 β€” πŸ‘ 4329    πŸ” 644    πŸ’¬ 257    πŸ“Œ 100

Well… it’s almost here. The second term of the most vile person I know of. Every time I see his ugly hostile face, his vagina neck, his Cheetos orange face, his horrid combover… Every time I hear his voice, hear his ridiculous lies and stories, or just hear his name… 🀬
I don’t know if I can do it.

15.12.2024 11:01 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

We’re about to see how much loss, pain and suffering people are willing to take in exchange for not wanting to vote for a woman.

14.12.2024 17:51 β€” πŸ‘ 30749    πŸ” 6214    πŸ’¬ 1252    πŸ“Œ 361
Post image

Pretty damn spot-on, don’t you think?

14.12.2024 21:10 β€” πŸ‘ 36360    πŸ” 7371    πŸ’¬ 1263    πŸ“Œ 405

TRUMP IN AUGUST 2024: From the day I take the oath of office, we'll rapidly drive prices down... they'll come down and they'll come down fast.

TRUMP NOW: It's hard to bring things down once they're up.

I'm always so disappointed when a liar's pants don't actually catch on fire.

14.12.2024 11:51 β€” πŸ‘ 74    πŸ” 37    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 1
Post image

Lol, this is much better.

14.12.2024 09:43 β€” πŸ‘ 21236    πŸ” 3361    πŸ’¬ 485    πŸ“Œ 112
Post image 11.12.2024 17:39 β€” πŸ‘ 43991    πŸ” 7777    πŸ’¬ 568    πŸ“Œ 245
Post image 12.12.2024 09:37 β€” πŸ‘ 40781    πŸ” 6090    πŸ’¬ 314    πŸ“Œ 161
Post image

This

11.12.2024 05:10 β€” πŸ‘ 340    πŸ” 100    πŸ’¬ 13    πŸ“Œ 6
Video thumbnail
11.12.2024 16:18 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

The GenX kid in me is wanting this!!
Why at Christmas time can I find all the things I want, but nothing to buy for my loved ones? πŸ˜‚

11.12.2024 16:15 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 11.12.2024 14:54 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Seriously it is always a different song every time

11.12.2024 14:37 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Law and Order SVU… but make it dance #costnmayor #cnmchoreo #shorts
YouTube video by Cost n' Mayor Law and Order SVU… but make it dance #costnmayor #cnmchoreo #shorts

Why does the theme song to SVU sound like the right answer!! youtube.com/shorts/PQ2wp...

11.12.2024 14:36 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

If this past election has taught us anything, it is that you can’t underestimate the power of stupidity.

11.12.2024 11:05 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Yes… we’ve all been there. But ours aren’t in the media spot light with dark eye makeup. 🀣

11.12.2024 11:27 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Dear Mr. Sauer:
I am writing in response to your letter dated November 26, 2024, regarding the above-referenced action. This Office will not stipulate to vacate the final judgment already entered by Supreme Court, New York County, in this action or otherwise seek to dismiss the action.
As you know, this is a civil enforcement action under Executive Law Β§ 63(12) against the Trump Organization, a business headquartered in New York, and its top executives concerning those defendants' fraudulent and unlawful actions to misleadingly inflate defendant Donald J. Trump's personal net worth in business transactions for the purpose of obtaining more favorable terms on loans and insurance policies than they otherwise would have received. This civil enforcement action was filed following a multiyear investigation by the Office, and multiple courts have rejected claims that the investigation or action were brought in anything other than good faith. See People v. Trump Org., Inc., 205 A.D.3d 625,
626-27 (1st Dep't 2022); Trump v. James, No. 1:21-1352, 2022 WL 1718951, at *12-14 (N.D.N.Y. May 27, 2022). Following summary judgment and an eleven-week bench trial, Supreme Court concluded that Mr. Trump and the other entity and individual defendants violated Β§ 63(12). The court also entered final judgment ordering various forms of equitable relief. Defendants appealed from Supreme Court's post-trial final judgment. That appeal has been fully briefed and argued in the Appellate Division, First Department, and the parties are now awaiting a decision from the First Department.
Your letter presents no basis for this Office to seek to vacate the final judgment or to dismiss this action.
First, Mr. Trump's upcoming inauguration as the next President of the United States has no bearing on the pendency of defendants' appeal in this action. This civil enforcement

Dear Mr. Sauer: I am writing in response to your letter dated November 26, 2024, regarding the above-referenced action. This Office will not stipulate to vacate the final judgment already entered by Supreme Court, New York County, in this action or otherwise seek to dismiss the action. As you know, this is a civil enforcement action under Executive Law Β§ 63(12) against the Trump Organization, a business headquartered in New York, and its top executives concerning those defendants' fraudulent and unlawful actions to misleadingly inflate defendant Donald J. Trump's personal net worth in business transactions for the purpose of obtaining more favorable terms on loans and insurance policies than they otherwise would have received. This civil enforcement action was filed following a multiyear investigation by the Office, and multiple courts have rejected claims that the investigation or action were brought in anything other than good faith. See People v. Trump Org., Inc., 205 A.D.3d 625, 626-27 (1st Dep't 2022); Trump v. James, No. 1:21-1352, 2022 WL 1718951, at *12-14 (N.D.N.Y. May 27, 2022). Following summary judgment and an eleven-week bench trial, Supreme Court concluded that Mr. Trump and the other entity and individual defendants violated Β§ 63(12). The court also entered final judgment ordering various forms of equitable relief. Defendants appealed from Supreme Court's post-trial final judgment. That appeal has been fully briefed and argued in the Appellate Division, First Department, and the parties are now awaiting a decision from the First Department. Your letter presents no basis for this Office to seek to vacate the final judgment or to dismiss this action. First, Mr. Trump's upcoming inauguration as the next President of the United States has no bearing on the pendency of defendants' appeal in this action. This civil enforcement

action is not a criminal action, and Supreme Court did not impose any criminal sanction on Mr. Trump or any other defendant. Accordingly, the various actions taken by the Special Counsel's office or the District Attorney's Office of New York County in the respective criminal cases brought by those offices against Mr. Trump are irrelevant here.
Contrary to your suggestion, the pendency of defendants' appeal during Mr. Trump's term as President fully comports with the U.S. Constitution. The final judgment concerns only business conduct undertaken by entities that are part of the Trump Organization and individual defendants who were acting on behalf of the Trump Organization. The judgment thus does not concern any conduct related to Mr. Trump's first term as President. Nor does it implicate any conduct that Mr. Trump might undertake after his upcoming inauguration.
Presidents do not have immunity from civil lawsuits arising from unofficial conduct, and such lawsuits may proceed while the President is in office. See Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 694
(1997); Zervos v. Trump, 171 A.D.3d 110, 128 (1st Dep't 2019); see also Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. 593, 615-16 (2024). Regardless, Mr. Trump's upcoming inauguration is irrelevant to the judgment rendered against the fourteen other defendants found liable by Supreme Court in this action.
There is also no merit to your claim that the pendency of defendants' own appeal will impede Mr. Trump's official duties as President. The ordinary burdens of civil litigation do not impede the President's official duties in a way that violates the U.S. Constitution. See Clinton,
520 U.S. at 705-06; Zervos, 171 A.D.3d at 125-26. In any event, Mr. Trump does not face any such litigation burdens here. The trial is over, final judgment has been rendered, and defendants' appeal to the First Department has been fully submitted and argued. Mr. Trump's official duties will not be impeded while awaiting the First Department's decision. Nor wi…

action is not a criminal action, and Supreme Court did not impose any criminal sanction on Mr. Trump or any other defendant. Accordingly, the various actions taken by the Special Counsel's office or the District Attorney's Office of New York County in the respective criminal cases brought by those offices against Mr. Trump are irrelevant here. Contrary to your suggestion, the pendency of defendants' appeal during Mr. Trump's term as President fully comports with the U.S. Constitution. The final judgment concerns only business conduct undertaken by entities that are part of the Trump Organization and individual defendants who were acting on behalf of the Trump Organization. The judgment thus does not concern any conduct related to Mr. Trump's first term as President. Nor does it implicate any conduct that Mr. Trump might undertake after his upcoming inauguration. Presidents do not have immunity from civil lawsuits arising from unofficial conduct, and such lawsuits may proceed while the President is in office. See Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 694 (1997); Zervos v. Trump, 171 A.D.3d 110, 128 (1st Dep't 2019); see also Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. 593, 615-16 (2024). Regardless, Mr. Trump's upcoming inauguration is irrelevant to the judgment rendered against the fourteen other defendants found liable by Supreme Court in this action. There is also no merit to your claim that the pendency of defendants' own appeal will impede Mr. Trump's official duties as President. The ordinary burdens of civil litigation do not impede the President's official duties in a way that violates the U.S. Constitution. See Clinton, 520 U.S. at 705-06; Zervos, 171 A.D.3d at 125-26. In any event, Mr. Trump does not face any such litigation burdens here. The trial is over, final judgment has been rendered, and defendants' appeal to the First Department has been fully submitted and argued. Mr. Trump's official duties will not be impeded while awaiting the First Department's decision. Nor wi…

The NY Attorney General has REJECTED Trump's bid to dismiss his $500M civil fraud judgment post-election. The AG stated that Trump's presidency doesn't shield him from civil litigation over non-official conduct, per the Constitution and multiple court precedents.

10.12.2024 17:20 β€” πŸ‘ 14831    πŸ” 3304    πŸ’¬ 432    πŸ“Œ 228

My cat has two and only two settings and they are:

1) awww look at the sleepy little baby

- or -

2) I swear to god if this motherf...

10.12.2024 14:31 β€” πŸ‘ 10230    πŸ” 851    πŸ’¬ 288    πŸ“Œ 64
Post image 11.12.2024 11:12 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Monarch Butterflies Are Recommended for Protected Status in U.S. They would become the most commonly seen species to receive federal protection if the proposal is adopted.

U.S. wildlife officials proposed on Tuesday that monarch butterflies receive protection as a threatened species.

11.12.2024 04:57 β€” πŸ‘ 2217    πŸ” 344    πŸ’¬ 53    πŸ“Œ 37

If this past election has taught us anything, it is that you can’t underestimate the power of stupidity.

11.12.2024 11:05 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I have nothing but respect for Mariah Carey, who created the most iconic Christmas song of all time about why she didn’t want presents, she needed dick this Christmas.

10.12.2024 05:43 β€” πŸ‘ 851    πŸ” 55    πŸ’¬ 32    πŸ“Œ 12

It took four years longer than Trump planned, but the January 6th insurrection ultimately succeeded after all. This was due to three main reasons: the cowardice of feckless Republicans in Congress; the greed of all-powerful billionaires; and disinformation fed to voters by Fox News and social media.

10.12.2024 15:06 β€” πŸ‘ 7217    πŸ” 1877    πŸ’¬ 528    πŸ“Œ 136

@justjeni is following 17 prominent accounts