@framechange.bsky.social
Now, realistically, you need 2/3rds of the Senate to vote to convict and remove, and since this is just being mad at Trump following the law, I'd be a bit shocked if they even got a third of the votes.
But this isn't about outcomes, it's about performance, so Andy has to make noise.
5/5
But in this tweet, he's advocating for people that enforce the law against Trump by ruling against him to be removed.
Not for "high crimes and misdemeanors", but because having Trump follow the law is apparently a bridge too far for Andy.
4/
Now Andy is the guy who has proposed allowing Trump a 3rd term by amending the constitution, in addition to lobbying for Trumps face to be added to Mount Rushmore.
So you know he's got his priorities straight -- just the important stuff for this guy.
3/
[...cont]
The House can impeach these hacks; let’s do it.
[Has a "known Get Trump Judicial activists" poster with photos and names]
[Note: slight edit - I stripped down the congress names to no tags]
===
Original post:
x.com/RepOgles/sta...
2/
It seems Andy Ogles has thoughts on the judiciary...
RepOgles: There are countless judges we should’ve impeached months ago.
I stand with TedCruz BrandonGill EliCrane ChipRoy Clyde, and I have articles ready, gathering dust on these DNC loyalist judges.
[cont...]
1/
That's why I say this is propaganda and not reporting.
A video, with someone that looks like Katie Porter, handing out "free" stuff, without any monitor -- when all of that is untrue, vague or not confirmed with actual facts.
Be mindful of this when seeing this stuff.
5/5
Now, I don't know what the California laws are around campaigning, but there isn't even an allegation that this is against the law -- just vague handwaving that this is "bad".
Also, most states have local monitors from both major parties at least, so this is just inaccurate.
4/
So first, we don't see the person from the front, just in profile, so I'm not sure if it's Katie Porter as claimed.
Second, it's totally unclear what she is handing out -- it's claimed that it is "free stuff", but without detail we don't know what it is at all.
3/
[Note: I took out the "BREAKING", as this isn't a news story, it's a propaganda hit]
Link to original:
x.com/Rightanglene...
2/
Weird flex...
Rightanglenews: A video of Democrat Katie Porter handing out free stuff to young students waiting in line to vote at UC Irvine is trending, showing exactly why California Democrats like Gavin Newsom oppose having people monitor their polling locations.
1/
This is all about shifting the "Overton window", and to normalize the fact he MIGHT run in 2028.
The sad part to me here is that Bannon doesn't feel they could find someone with the chops to take up the MAGA cause to run after Trump leaves.
But don't let them normalize this crap.
4/4
First thing first, here was a lot of posts about this, and I picked this one as it came up early in my search.
There is lots of people complaining that "Trump isn't serious" or that "he's just trolling". Which is of course why he's trying to prosecute people who pursued cases against him.
3/
[...cont]
In spite his oath to defend our Constitution.
With a 60% disapproval rating
===
Link to original post:
x.com/ReallyAmeric...
2/
Need to say something about this insanity...
ReallyAmerican1: BREAKING: In an insane moment, Steve Bannon calls Trump "a vehicle of divine providence" and insists that he "will be President in 2028 and get a third term."
[clip of Bannon with the quote]
[cont...]
1/
Instead of taking stock and thinking, "hey, maybe some of that was wrong", their reaction is to lash out.
*They* could not be wrong; this isn't repugnant to most Americans, no -- it is the GOP leadership that is in the wrong.
So much for the party of personal responsibility.
6/6
So phew, that's a rant. Also, not sure who this is exactly, but I'm guessing this is related to Matt's meltdown and JD Vance's comments.
Lots to process here.
The first thing that hit me is that this person is more mad about the fallout then the least bit thoughtful about what they did.
5/
[...cont]
Everyone in this article is a patriot and everyone attacking them is a dirty, treacherous, impotent, cowardly, bundle of sticks
They all deserve to be destroyed
[QT of Politico story]
===
Link to original post:
x.com/aidanxitter/...
4/
[...cont]
I wasn’t allowed to talk about “replacement theory” or any mainline immigration stances. They asked me to resign over Trump’s green card diploma mill comments
I was black listed by YR National and blocked by their account because their leader is a BLM sympathizing closet case
[cont...]
3/
[...cont]
And then the GOP condemned them
Fuck these people
The GOP treated to fire my friend and vice chairman from his AG job because of tiktoks I posted about immigration
[cont...]
2/
Wait, what is this...
aidanxitter: A friend of mine got blackmailed into leaking these chats. A total fucking coward and a useless piece of shit
One of the people in here, he attended his wedding with me and still sold him over to the devil
All over some useless YR beef
[cont...]
1/
So take this as an opportunity to remember that; criticize, mock and belittle their dumb ideas and mistakes.
It undermines them and makes them look bad, as they should. Keep doing it!!
5/5
I'm glad that Matt is so mad that he felt he needed to take to Twitter and call it a "b*tch move" though, as it shows how actually fragile and petty things are over on the right.
This is one reason that mocking and making fun of them works so well -- they are too concerned about appearances.
4/
So, disclosure first - I have no clue what triggered this, I don't have insight yet into the backstory.
That said, LOL.
I'm very amused that "unity on the right" isn't about debate, transparency or open criticism, but rather private backchannels.
3/
Original post:
x.com/MattWalshBlo...
2/
Matt has concerns...
MattWalshBlog: If you're a conservative and you have a problem with someone on the Right, you can reach out to them privately and express your concerns. Performatively attacking and denouncing your own people in public is a bitch move.
1/
Kirk wasn't a philanthropist or a deep thinker; he was a committed partisan who found an audience he was able to build a platform which paid him pretty well.
Pretending he did something he didn't doesn't build his legacy, it just builds a lie.
5/5
Bessent frames him as a "financial educator" but really he discouraged people from going to school. Maybe his lesson was "save $ by not going to college"?
Most of his interactions with students are about "owning" them, not trying to persuade or educate.
4/
So, this is just more creative revisionism about what Kirk stood for. His org supposedly was to bring more college students into the fold, but his main audience was much older and generally not college educated.
3/
Original post:
x.com/SecScottBess...
2/
Ah, another Cabinet admin person chimes in...
SecScottBessent: Charlie Kirk’s belief in financial education and opportunity shaped a generation. Charlie was a patriot, teacher, and visionary who understood that the strength of our nation lies in an informed and empowered citizenry.
1/
