Jed T. E. Rhodes's Avatar

Jed T. E. Rhodes

@jedwashere.bsky.social

Jed T. E. Rhodes. Writer, actor, fanboy, film-maker, father, musician, student of the Shaw No, King of the Bollocks (He/him)

183 Followers  |  254 Following  |  143 Posts  |  Joined: 20.10.2024  |  1.9043

Latest posts by jedwashere.bsky.social on Bluesky

For the avoidance of doubt.

Nazis can go fuck themselves.

02.10.2025 21:15 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Lessons after a few more goes

1. Definitely have more than one sun
2. Rendering is a bitch, but worth it for smooth 60fps
3. Need to figure out how to add space
4. Thank fucking God for free models on Sketchlab (and yes, Iโ€™ve made a note of the original model artists).

27.09.2025 16:42 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Lessons learned so far.

1. There are a lot of really nice ship models out there.
2. I need to figure out how to make SPACE
3. Rendering takes forever. Expected that one.
4. Scaling up is helpful.
5. Always have more than one sun.

27.09.2025 10:32 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 1

I am about to try my hand at Blender.

โ€ฆ yeah, this is not going to go well ๐Ÿ˜‚

26.09.2025 15:59 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 1

Yeah, thatโ€™s how I have my coffee too. I blame Janeway for my coffee habits. ๐Ÿ˜‚

25.09.2025 19:13 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Never change, AO3

14.09.2025 19:37 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Glad Iโ€™m not the only one who thought they fridged Batel in SNW

13.09.2025 14:52 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Fair enough.

10.09.2025 10:25 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Agreed there. I mean, Iโ€™d happily accept - even if it makes no sense - if they just at the end of SNW had the TOS Enterprise show up, with a โ€œshe got refitโ€. Would it โ€œreallyโ€ work? Nah. But itโ€™s an explanation, and the SNW Enterprise is already different internally from the DSC Enterprise.

10.09.2025 10:24 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Okay. ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ––

10.09.2025 09:07 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Sometimes I forget how much of a nerd I am ๐Ÿ˜‚

10.09.2025 08:17 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I should point out that Iโ€™m not _angry_ about these discontinuities. I find them incredibly fascinating. Indeed, LDS has - by virtue of its including all these designs - turned it into a fun headcanon question. But a question it remains. 3/3

10.09.2025 08:08 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

(Generations is an aberration in this only because of production) But in SNW, we have these slight discontinuities that now show the Enterprise cycling between three variants in the space of four years. Even disregarding TOSโ€™ visuals, SNW has changed something. 2/

10.09.2025 08:08 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Thatโ€™s true! And also within TNG, and Generations, and later DS9, and Lower Decks has canonised that beautifully with in-universe inferred explanations. But the difference is, except in Generations, there was some consistency about where those were worn. Cerritos has one uni. Titan has another 1/

10.09.2025 08:08 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

There are ridiculous logical endpoints of arguments about any sense-impaired individualโ€™s enjoyment of a piece of media that could be considered. I donโ€™t disregard the opinion of other fans. All I said was _for me_, visuals are canon; they matter to me. I donโ€™t ask them to matter to anyone else 2/2

10.09.2025 07:55 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

On this point: my counterpoint to that is that television is a visual experience. Things are designed to be seen, and the design has meaning or intent. That might not be part of another fanโ€™s world, but that doesnโ€™t mean it doesnโ€™t exist and shouldnโ€™t be thought about at all. 1/

10.09.2025 07:52 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I mean, not as much because thereโ€™s an explanation provided that allows for more suspension of disbelief than the current visual inconsistencies allow. I can accept and imagine that TMP comes after TOS. I canโ€™t as readily imagine SNW _is_ TOS.

10.09.2025 07:51 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I said โ€œIโ€ consider visuals canon. For me, itโ€™s a part of my viewing experience. For a visually impaired person, it might not be. I ascribe importance to visuals. Others do not, whether viewing impaired or otherwise.

10.09.2025 07:45 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Okay, so 1: Iโ€™m a fan, not the guy in charge of writing the stuff or organising the production. The inconsistency exists, whether you ascribe importance to it or not. As to your second point: I think youโ€™re reaching for something that isnโ€™t present in my commentary.

10.09.2025 07:41 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 3    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Slightly, but i find it kind of interesting that thereโ€™s things like the SNW uniform showing up for pre-Cage characters, the SNW uniform and Klingons in place of the Disco stuff for the war flashbacksโ€ฆ YMMV on whether visual consistency is a canon thing but even current Trek isnโ€™t great at it.

10.09.2025 07:07 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Thatโ€™s sort of a non-sequitur to the question (though for the record I agree). And the visual inconsistency extends to how SNW shows Disco and pre-Disco.

10.09.2025 06:34 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Depends if you consider visuals to be canon or not. I do. The modern Trek shows obviously screwed the visual pooch for how TOS looked, but Strange New Worlds hasnโ€™t even been faithful to Discoโ€™s visual language - loads of inconsistencies.

10.09.2025 05:17 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

โ€ฆ now I just wanna know who the Lower Decks cast of the saints would be. Like, is there a St Steve who like got a sainthood for fixing a farmerโ€™s leaky roof or something?

09.09.2025 21:14 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I think the store stopped stocking us. Faulty circuitry was a line-wide problem with this model - along with probably more problems than I care to admit ๐Ÿ˜‚

09.09.2025 21:10 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

A pretty poorly insulated one, clearly

09.09.2025 21:08 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Weirdly, more likeโ€ฆ Iโ€™m in conversation. The more I go, the more I find myself learning new things about these characters. Things they could never have been before, things they seem to want to be now.

09.09.2025 21:06 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Now at 77463. Slow and steady wins the race, and Iโ€™m actually really happy with some of the fun ideas that keep sparking as I go.

09.09.2025 21:01 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

This was a really fun audio to put together, with some amazing work in it from all the cast.

08.09.2025 14:51 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image 07.09.2025 19:27 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 132    ๐Ÿ” 20    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 1

new video out on #sergeantbeckettyoutube at 6:00pm GMT - Sergeant Beckett Reviews - Star Trek: Strange New Worlds - S3 E8 - Terrarium, Ft. @jedwashere.bsky.social

#startrek #startrekstrangenewworlds

youtu.be/I3SKwuFjO4E

07.09.2025 16:59 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

@jedwashere is following 18 prominent accounts