Nothing wrong with existential treadmill ! Or as I like to call it
โSisyphus Fitness Planโ! ๐
@rubinmd.bsky.social
Neuroscience, Affective Neuroscience, Psychiatry, Psychodynamic Therapy, Existentialism, Philosophy
Nothing wrong with existential treadmill ! Or as I like to call it
โSisyphus Fitness Planโ! ๐
I think philosophical discussion of โQualiaโ and the โhard problemโ of consciousness is not as mysterious as it is made out to be, Patricia Churchland and Dan Dennettโs Eliminative materialism/ identity theory of mental states seems satisfactory to me ! ๐คทโโ๏ธ
07.07.2025 22:40 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Why canโt we model Qualia ? Is there an intractable barrier to modeling Qualia ? Iโm just tired of philosophical arguments about Qualia ๐
07.07.2025 15:46 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Does the computational model of emotion follow a constructivist approach or basic emotions model ? Just curious from clinical perspective
07.07.2025 15:31 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Oh the stories from my peer review conversations about hospitalized psychiatric patients! I asked one doc out of frustration - did you dream as kid to become a insurance reviewer and deny care, he called me unprofessional! ๐คทโโ๏ธ
22.05.2025 02:38 โ ๐ 12 ๐ 2 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Old terms are hard to gets out of common vocabulary. Need to replacement term! Even old โcognitiveโ and โaffectiveโ divide may not stand either
26.04.2025 21:41 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0But you havenโt tried โcold plungeโ or โred light therapyโ? That cures all genetic and epigenetic ailments! ( I feel I have to say itโs a joke because some people have โhumor deficit disorderโ)
22.04.2025 03:25 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0If only horses had gods, those gods wonโt be greedy ! Just sayin!
21.04.2025 01:10 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0This is very disheartening for a clinician committed to โevidence based medicineโ ! If evidence is โjunkโ then what ? Field of โmeta-scienceโ needs to help us !
17.04.2025 23:19 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0If one already knows the conclusion, finding data to support that conclusion, is what cranks do, not researchers!
12.04.2025 23:43 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0There is a concept of โcategoricalโ vs โdimensionalโ diagnosis- I like more dimensional aspect rather than fixed labels from DSM - but the rigid insurance system likes DSM categories.
06.04.2025 14:21 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Trait dependent vs context dependent behavior,not much research in this area- leads to poor diagnostic reliability in personality disorders.I was involved in a Bipolar study,out of about 100 people we screened who had been treated/labeled bipolar, only 3met stringent diagnostic evaluation criteria
05.04.2025 16:57 โ ๐ 7 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Bias and motivated reasoning is like โhalitosisโ- everyone else has it, except me !๐
05.04.2025 16:38 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0When one gets into any sort of dualism,property vs substance dualism,
you get endless metaphysical debates about emergence and to some sort of panpsychism or idealism in my view! Also if interested, balance Panksepps model with Barrettโs constructivist model of emotions based on Predictive coding
Past Psychopharmacology clinical trials at UT Southwestern, Dallas. Now in clinical practice, trying to bring lessons from affective neuroscience to clinical practice. Appreciate if I could be added
24.03.2025 02:05 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0What is the flaw in hard physicalist view that you see in Pankseppโs model ? What would Substance dualism add to the model ?
24.03.2025 01:52 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0