We had multiple tire vendors, and it wasn't exactly good. Bridgestone was often a lot slower, made them look bad and the teams choosing them had no chance no matter how good their car was.
02.11.2025 18:03 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0We had multiple tire vendors, and it wasn't exactly good. Bridgestone was often a lot slower, made them look bad and the teams choosing them had no chance no matter how good their car was.
02.11.2025 18:03 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
"If you give them arms we nuke"
"If you give them tanks we nuke"
"If you give them jets we nuke"
The best moment to arm Ukraine was yesterday. The second best is today.
Russia will never stop, they'll take Ukraine and attack the baltics next.
We're in the post-truth era. Nothing that has ever been said matters anymore. No fact is undisputed.
You can simply state the opposite and thus a new truth has been born. Same reason why those fascist parties are rising so fast. They aren't bound by truth or facts, unlike everyone else.
The market is equally confused as the rest of us of what the fuck they are doing.
09.04.2025 18:52 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0So... that means we're clear on OPSEC?
03.04.2025 13:45 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
It is not a VAT. VAT is the same for everyone, no matter if you sell stuff domestic or it gets imported.
Tariffs are hurting US consumers and every foreign business that sold to them so far, and sends a clear signal: Do not engage in trade with the US, we'll fuck you over at any time.
You can use Signal without exposing your number. The fact that they aren't using a separate device is their own fuckup, and exactly why you shouldn't use Signal when threatened by state actors.
Still, Signal itself is NOT compromised. It is always active user action that creates those fuckups.
This is simply not true. There is no evidence of Signal being compromised.
What is known though, that there are certain flaws that can be used to trick unsuspecting (or stupid) users into leaking information.
Also, if your phone is compromised, Signal won't be able to help you.
It isn't, its a formal process. But they used the same argument in the past with all the boxes found in Trumps Golf resort )
25.03.2025 15:37 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Most of them have always been rich, including Elon. The traps are there, but for the poor.
21.03.2025 11:38 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0They're meant to be put on Taiwanese beaches though? Not sure they get a friendly welcome.
13.03.2025 08:31 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0How would they be able to defend those from FoV drones? Looks like a very hard task to accomplish?
13.03.2025 08:16 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0They strive for simple solutions in a complex world. To free their own mind from complex questions and answers, they are eager to give up all the liberties that democracy has given them.
04.03.2025 12:23 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0That is not the UI they're using, just "a" UI though.
23.02.2025 20:57 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0That's the theory though. Maybe their UI just doesn't really show what the TX is about anyways, and they blindly signed it thinking it was a regular TX?
23.02.2025 14:52 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0They signed a transaction they shouldn't have.
23.02.2025 12:01 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0This is an absolutely insane situation to be honest, and shows that crypto is a heavily concentrated playground for very very rich people and actors. Far gone are the dreams of financial independency, crypto has become the very nightmare it tried to combat with BTC over 15 years ago.
23.02.2025 09:03 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0There are two scenarios: A) they aren't solvent, and we'll shortly find out or B) they actually do have all the funds for user deposits.. don't you ask yourself whether this is a good thing if one company holds 0.05% of one of the top cryptocurrencies and still functions after loosing it?
23.02.2025 09:03 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
The #bybit hack also demonstrates, that crypto hasn't been the decentralized pool of wealth for a long time.
0.05% of all ETH gets stolen (imagine this being another currency), and the company that looses this money claims to still be solvent and able to back all desposits 1:1.
You can easily check this. It is true, holding elections at wartime is unconstitutional in Ukraine.
It also wouldn't make a lot of sense, given the amount of displaces people that would be unable to vote.
I usually mix the liquid anitbiotics into a portion of churros / liquidnack. Works perfectly and my cat gobbles it up.
I do the same with tablets that can be pulverized π€£
WΓ€ren Sie grundsΓ€tzlich nicht verpflichtet die Nutzer zu informieren, wenn diese EU BΓΌrger sind (GDPR kennt ja diesbezΓΌglich keine Grenzen?) resp. EU BΓΌrger die Services nutzen kΓΆnnen?
17.12.2024 20:11 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
They literally signed a treaty to prevent future aggression, giving up their nuclear arsenal.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapes...
And in the end, they bump into each other. This probably isn't the moment where VER got his tyre sliced, but might be the moment where NOR lost control so they touched again slightly later.
I guess 99/100 times nothing happens in those instances, just a bit of wheel bangin. But yeah, that was 1/100
Splitseconds later (you can see its only 50 meter from the brake markers), the situation has changed:
- VER noticed that NOR is coming down quite fast on the outside
- He turns ever so slightly left to deny him the space on the outside of the turn.
The reason VER got penalized, is this:
- VER is aiming for the inside line here
- NOR anticipates this, comes out of the slipstream and chooses to go outside (left)
Yeah it is a lot for sure, and it is probably the correct penalty. It just isn't fair sometimes that one guys is out of the race, and the other gets a penalty that doesn't even punish him.
But that's sports I guess π
Btw, I also think Lando should have simply backed off. He should know better if he gets squeezed than to risk his race, but he is obviously younger and misjudged the situation. He could've also left the track for the curb, but didn't bother too.
01.07.2024 14:54 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
I think this view shows it quite good:
imgur.com/overhead-vie...
He got a 10s penalty for that, which didn't affect him at all, and Norris paid with a DNF due to damage.
Penalties are usually given for the offense, not the outcome, but the fact that the penalty had no effect at all on Max clearly makes it questionable if it has any purpose at all.