A screenshot of a post from Venkat that asks @grok tk list @elonmusk's top 25 enemies or negative accounts. Grok replies with the following: Based on verified sources and X activity analysis, here's a substantiated list of 25 notable critics or accounts frequently negative toward Elon Musk (ranked by influence/engagement): 1. @sama (Sam Altman, OpenAl feud) 2. @JeffBezos (rivalry via Blue Origin) 3. @BillGates (shorting Tesla, public spats) 4. @MarkZuckerberg (Meta vs. X competition) 5. @realDonaldTrump (recent H-1B, policy clashes) 6. @AOC (labor, wealth critiques) 7. @SenWarren (antitrust calls) 8. @parismarx (tech critic, anti-Musk podcaster) 9. @dccc (Dems label him "enemy of middle class") 10. @Occupy Democrats (corruption accusations) 11. @thedailybeast (feud coverage, "people

A continuation of the list of Elon Musks enemies. It reads: 11. @thedailybeast (feud coverage, "people hate him") 12. @lowles_nick (calls X "hate platform") 13. @MightyKeef (anti-Musk memes) 14. @SSWorks (DOGE/Social Security attacks) 15. @RanaAyyub (defends Musk critics) 16. @marcowenjones (disinfo, bot exposés) 17. @stevanzetti (neo-Nazi X links) 18. @LegendaryEnergy (calls Musk "fraud") 19. @gummibear737 (woke-right criticism) 20. @BowTiedRanger (H-1B, parenting jabs) 21. @Dividend Breeder (propaganda claims) 22. @MarcusTulliusII (anti-Semitic bot accusations) 23. @torrHL (subsidy hypocrisy threads) 24. @Cookieookie815 (anti-Semitic echo chamber) 25. @RonPaul (hate figure analysis) This draws from diverse media (NYT, WSJ, Politico) and X data, noting biases in partisan sources.

According to Grok I am one of Elon Musk's top enemies

I feel like there’s a slogan somewhere in:

Is it justice?
Nah, it’s just ICE.

But I’m not sure if that really works on not.

Yeah, same. Thanks for looking. Though I did find that it's cited in the book "Perversion of Justice." jkbjournalist.bsky.social, probably a long shot but do you have access to the NY Post article "Randy Andy Hush-Hush Visit"?

The family of Virginia Giuffre responds to the Maxwell prison move: "President Trump has sent a clear message today: Pedophiles deserve preferential treatment and their victims do not matter."

This Usenet post from April 21, 1999 reprints a purported NY Post article entitled "Randy Andy's hush-hush visit", detailing a dinner thrown by Epstein in honor of Prince Andrew and lists Trump among the attendees. Can't find original article archived anywhere, can anyone verify its existence?

Neal Travis of the NY Post wrote a lot about Ghislaine Maxwell back in the day, wish all his stuff was digitized. pagesix.com/2000/12/01/s...

Trump's IRS chief finally said IRS Direct File is "gone." Intuit lobbied hard against free federal filing for years.

Here's Intuit CEO Sasan Goodarzi defending that record in a Decoder interview last year. Intuit later asked us to cut this part. We refused.

I watched your "Grimes Test" video and it was bad.

BREAKING on MSNBC:

Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney has confirmed to NBC News that Maxwell has just been moved to a federal prison in Texas.
 
That prison — FPC Bryan in Bryan, TX — is a minimum-security federal prison camp.

What we know about James Rodden, the ICE prosecutor accused of running white supremacist X account In April 2023, the @GlomarResponder X account wrote "'Migrants' are all criminals."

You know an article was good when it's a gift that keeps on giving months after it was published

www.snopes.com/news/2025/07...

What we know about James Rodden, the ICE prosecutor accused of running white supremacist X account In April 2023, the @GlomarResponder X account wrote "'Migrants' are all criminals."

The Rodden case has had enough of a resurgence to get a Snopes article! www.snopes.com/news/2025/07...

The jeeproject and jeevacation accounts both also contain a single photo of a nursery. Weird.

I think this is Epstein's Houzz account. "jeeproject@yahoo.com" is an email mentioned in a FOIA document and it's remarkably similar to the jeevacation Pinterest account (a single album full of home renovation ideas) www.houzz.com/user/jeeproj...

Epstein's Pinterest account? Has this been reported on? I knows Business Insider reported on *an* Epstein Pinterest account, but that one used different username (jeevacation). www.pinterest.com/epsteinjeffr...

What piece was that?

Jeffrey Epstein's LiveJournal account, just sitting there under the username "jeffreyepstein." Unless it was someone pretending to be him and writing rather anodyne posts about science funding circa 2010. jeffreyepstein.livejournal.com/profile/

Jeffrey Epstein's Gravatar account, surprisingly still up. Am I the first person to find this? Is there some kind of "New Epstein info" bounty that I can cash in on? gravatar.com/jeffreyepstein

I'm guessing that Epstein himself was the one posting as "Admin"? Someone let me know if that wasn't the case. But if it was him, he certainly had that distinctively boomer-ish approach to punctuation.

Looking through Jeffrey Epstein's Web 1.0-ish site about his passion for science and boy howdy web.archive.org/web/20101111...

Vance follows almost every prominent Twitter nazi. Raw Egg Nationalist, captivedreamer7, CityBureaucrat, Cremieux....

Michael Jackson never hung around overweight children.

I'm not making any claim here. Any inferences you male are on you.

Oh Jesus Christ. Don't make me fucking nostalgic for the restraining influence of the Federalist Society.

You haven’t read granular reporting until you realize that @stevanzetti.bsky.social got close enough to Nazi ICE official James Rodden to eavesread his iPhone screen! I will be subscribing to @texasobserver.org and @proteanmag.com as a direct result of this masterpiece of investigative reporting.

The FT View: The longer it has continued, the more it has borne the hallmarks of a vengeful assault by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s far-right government to destroy the very fabric of Palestinian society. https://on.ft.com/3UBv3Us

Lawyer Dilan Esper writing about how amazing the Bollea v. Gawker case was for him while insisting no harm done to the 1st Amendment. I can't say that much about our mediation strategy (it's shrouded in lawyer-client privilege and work product) but I have seen Nick Denton make accusations about it, and they are false. We were willing to settle; Gawker needed to offer a lot more than they did though. In other words, Peter Thiel was not my client and he was not directing the litigation behind the scenes. We were actually litigating the case exactly the same way we would have had Bollea been personally paying his bills. Thiel may have had his reasons for getting Gawker (and to be clear, he apparently paid the bills for several cases that were brought by us and others against Gawker), but the strategy doesn't work without a viable case. Gawker hung itself with its conduct towards Bollea. The bottom line is I take a great deal of professional pride in what we did. Precisely because we actually didn't ruin the First Amendment. No outlet is prevented from doing real journalism as a result of the Bollea v. Gawker case. We simply enforced a long existing norm. And drew a line in an era of "anything goes" content on the Internet. This was Hulk Hogan's legacy, and in a very real way, it is mine as well.

I had to spend two and a half years fighting a frivolous lawsuit that was a direct result of Bollea v. Gawker. And that lawsuit massively decreased our capability to do what we do, so I take issue with one of Hulk Hogan's lawyers claiming that Bollea v. Gawker had no impact on journalism

No shock here... the affidavit charging the two surgical center employees says that the officers were, in fact, conducting a "roving patrol" when they decided to start "randomly" start following the landscapers... who happened to be Hispanic.

DHS initially claimed that the officers were engaged in a "targeted" enforcement operation--that is, this was not a random racial profiling incident, but the man was a known suspect who they had reason to believe was in the country illegally. But guess what... DHS LIES x.com/DHSgov/statu...

Anyway, TLDR: if you just started following me, one of my main things is digging through Usenet archives to find things that are especially interesting today.

And 9/11 is obviously a big one, vis a vis trying to find contemporaneous accounts of historical events. Google's date search kind of sucks which makes it especially hard to find the *first* reaction to 9/11. But there's certainly contemporaneous responses available.

I also just like using Usenet to see contemporaneous accounts of historical events. Been trying to pinpoint the very first online comment reacting to the OJ verdict, still working on it. But I have found a lot of people relieved than an OJ verdict meant their soap operas would finally return