Teatime 🦝🟥🦉

I want to go to this one leftist event in my location, but it's hosted by PSL and I'm not in the Epstein class, actually...

PSL - Party for Sugdeez and Ligma

Smooth, huh?

Omg I'm a forest all of a sudden 😦

Are u gonna fuck the tree? 🤨

No bluesky I'm not importing my contacts. They don't need to see this shit

Omg she said the fuck word 😮

So has anyone ever actually ate that burger that nuts in your throat or...?

Personally I like the idea of a neighborhood council of women that decides all people and property related decisions.

Allowing every woman between 14 and 70 to direct democracy the neighborhood and family decisions.

Oh fuck... a lot of you were born before 9/11, huh?

Idk who's right, but I want so badly to make a "Pannekoek was PanneCooking" pun. Idk enough about the dutch-german left to make a verdict about it though.

Actually everyone should read Rosa Luxembourg, Endnotes, Society of the Spectacle (its not just OG Manufacturing Consent, please actually read it) and Marx in the Anthropocene by Kohei Saito.

Im begging my fellow Anarchists to just read Marxist/Marxian works. Its not all Leninists/Maoists.

them can secure the same profits as the national corporation

Agreed. Ideologization has turned these movements into separate ecosystems with Team-Sports rivalries against each other over the smallest possible differences. And we wonder why these movements aren't successful. It's like if each Walmart became a separate corporation and then wondered why none of

Not to mention Debord's approach to ideology is interesting (I agree with it I think) 🤔🧐

Hence why I hate him. Broken clock of a man

empathize with when Proudhon said he wanted a society where he would be executed as a conservative.

I'm the furthest left thing in my community, I think, and I want a society where I am far behind on the times by comparison.

This one is a really obvious moral choice, but I kinda look forward to the moral choices that we haven't considered yet but future people have. I want to hear them so I can implement them ahead of time kinda selfishly, but also because I want the sense of society improving.

I hate him, but I kinda

You're waiting for the midnight merch drop, I'm waiting for the eventual yard sale of children who inherited the merch and have no clue what it is where they'll sell it for 5-10 bucks #TheLongGame

loyalty at worst.

That is all.

interactive activities that are separate from government or from labor, then it is all but guaranteed that a communist society would need these things as well in order to function. Anything outside of this idea is idealism at best or a reactionary rejection of fact in favor of blind ideological

life.

Entertainment, unrelated to one's daily events and activities and unrelated to one's government, will have to exist for a society to possibly function. This was the purpose of the original board games and sports going back thousands of years. If every single society has some sort of games or

child. We should not lie to them or construct an entirely separate society for them as we do now, but we should start slow and slowly bring them into the real world at an adjustable but moderate pace. By the age of 25, one should be fully immersed in the world with the real possibility of a stable

to not terrorize and traumatize children. The issue we see today with eldest children with siblings is that being forced to grow up too fast is detrimental to brain development, and getting rid of all children's media and forcing them to interact with only the real world does just this, but to every

opportunities provided by the state would allow it to supercede Nintendo and avoid the toxic traits inherited to Nintendo by its situation in a post-capitalist market system.

As for children's media, this is necessary in every society, with some degree of separation from the mature world, in order

Nintendo, outside of being a video game creator, currently plays a pivotal role in children's media due to the current lack of interactive public alternatives. The corporation behind it gives it more legitimacy and recognition than any possible start-up alternative, however one with the power and

entertainment possibilities (or even possible propagandistic potential), you would need to construct an alternative which is not too aggressively ideological otherwise a consumer base will not form around it except for already established party supporters.

and the inherently capitalist marketing and corporate choices of gaming companies which are to be abolished, not the concept of interactive video media itself. Even if you were to illegalize every video game which currently exists, in order to receive the possible educational benefits and

topics in a way that allows them to dismantle and reassemble until they understand said thing.

Video games themselves are not the problems that one is trying to abolish as a member of the communist movement. It is the toxic nature of the reactionary undercurrent present within gaming communities

and an association of their currently negatives traits, which result so from its situation within a capitalist society, as inherently bourgeois and "degenerating".

Video games provide an interactive medium by which tactile, visual, and kinesthetic learners can engage with concepts and complex