Organization set up to collect and distribute streaming mechanical royalties to songwriters and publishers in the US.
04.08.2025 16:34 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@futureofmusic.bsky.social
Education, research and advocacy for musicians.
Organization set up to collect and distribute streaming mechanical royalties to songwriters and publishers in the US.
04.08.2025 16:34 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Also, if you record for a label and your record hasnβt yet recouped, you still likely can collect mechanicals and performance royalties if you are registered.
04.08.2025 15:38 β π 5 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0Redid the math and itβs actually closer to a 26% boost!
04.08.2025 15:37 β π 8 π 6 π¬ 1 π 0I gave an in-depth interview with my hometown Chicago Tribune about whatβs going to happen to NPR and PBS, and how cutting public media is part of a broader anti-democratic ideological project.
02.08.2025 15:04 β π 367 π 161 π¬ 11 π 9Correct! Thanks for flagging!
04.08.2025 15:35 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0(Obvs this doesnβt take into account label deals, publishing/admin deals, distributor fees etc.)
04.08.2025 15:34 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Actually thanks for askingβwe miscalculated, itβs closer to 26%! Composition performance royalties and mechanicals together add up to 21% of total royalty payout, but if you start collecting that itβs a 26% increase.
04.08.2025 15:33 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Pulling numbers from Mannattβs helpful calculator. Granted, itβs an oversimplification given different subscription tiers and international differences. But weβve found itβs a pretty accurate data point. www.manatt.com/music-stream...
04.08.2025 15:28 β π 6 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0The fastest way for musicians who record original material to improve their Spotify royalties: register for a PRO (ASCAP or BMI) and register for the MLC. You will immediately start earning about 21% more from your streams.
04.08.2025 14:23 β π 29 π 5 π¬ 5 π 3Come see me on this panel! Or, better yet, come see Bruce "Sunpie" Barnes, Edward "Juicey" Jackson, Tamara Jackson, Fred Johnson, Delfeayo Marsalis, and BIg Chief Howard Miller on this panel, moderated by Lolis Eric Elie. I'll be listening more than talking.
ellanola.org/upcoming/the...
Oh Mary was so delightful!!!
29.07.2025 22:28 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Sheβs right: musiciansβ professional lives typically involve being small businesspeople as well as laborers, which at times can be enormously rewarding, but can also mean encountering many forms of precarity simultaneously. www.nytimes.com/2025/07/29/o...
29.07.2025 16:28 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Awesome to see @linamkhan.bsky.social recognize musicians in her @nytimesoped.bsky.social opinion piece as an example of small businesses under threat from consolidation and extractive business models.
29.07.2025 16:24 β π 10 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Not sure there is a contradiction!
28.07.2025 22:31 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Some basics: why does Spotify pay less than some rival services? One key reason is the free tier. Ads bring in only ~13% of Spotify revenue, but more than half of monthly users are not paid subscribers. Subscription dollars subsidize the ad supported tier and that drives per stream rates down.
28.07.2025 22:09 β π 11 π 3 π¬ 1 π 0Sadly no DC date on this tour
27.07.2025 22:45 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Our allies at @afm-union.bsky.social local 802 are hosting an info session on Gen AI! Open to all musicians! Info here: us02web.zoom.us/meeting/regi...
25.07.2025 16:09 β π 6 π 3 π¬ 0 π 0Hereβs where the Fire Aid money went: www.latimes.com/entertainmen...
26.07.2025 22:45 β π 5 π 2 π¬ 0 π 1Broadcasters and big tech keep pointing fingers at each other, but serious antimonopoly policy analysis means no one is let off the hook. Open Markets gets it right.
25.07.2025 17:33 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Our allies at @afm-union.bsky.social local 802 are hosting an info session on Gen AI! Open to all musicians! Info here: us02web.zoom.us/meeting/regi...
25.07.2025 16:09 β π 6 π 3 π¬ 0 π 0DC is so lucky to have the Fort Reno concert series. Free shows in the park every summer since 1968. Whatβs happening in your town?
22.07.2025 01:05 β π 10 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Which is exactly the pointβthe need to work toward a framing that allows for the articulation of shared commitments, and the difficulty of doing so! As this exchange regrettably illustrates!
22.07.2025 00:42 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Apologies, intent was not to dunk, but to reframe. We know you get there is nuance!
22.07.2025 00:20 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Nuance is good! Characterizing different views of fair use as βtargeting fair use for destructionβ doesnβt seem particularly nuanced!
22.07.2025 00:06 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Not at all! The issue is the habit of describing people with a different view of fair use as having no commitment to or investment in fair use.
22.07.2025 00:01 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0There are more options available!
21.07.2025 23:52 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Well no, itβs simply: fair use for everyone, accessible remedies to valid claims of infringement also for everyone.
21.07.2025 23:33 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Fair use for everyone, accessible legal remedies to valid claims of infringement also for everyone.
21.07.2025 23:30 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0The notion that fair use is always under attack is not without some truth, and yet also a very incomplete description of the dynamic. It can also be a self-fulfilling story. (The same is true for stories like βcopyright is always under attackβ.)
21.07.2025 23:14 β π 5 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0For those of us who care deeply about the expressive freedom that fair use enables, itβs a dilemma! For example, when people argue (wrongly in our view) that unlicensed AI training generally qualifies as fair use, it undermines many creatorsβ investment in preserving fair use.
21.07.2025 23:06 β π 10 π 5 π¬ 4 π 0