Jeff Allen's Avatar

Jeff Allen

@jeffallen.bsky.social

Now: Building smaller but better things @Integrity_Inst integrityinstitute.org Physics: @LBNLphysics - @augerobs Tech: @dotdashco - @Facebook - @DNC

918 Followers  |  288 Following  |  18 Posts  |  Joined: 21.09.2023  |  2.3393

Latest posts by jeffallen.bsky.social on Bluesky

Post image

πŸ’¬ Can AI break the engagement trap?

In August, our co-founder @jeffallen.bsky.social reflected on the evolution of Trust & Safety, and why regulatory pressureβ€”and transparencyβ€”still matter most.

▢️ Read the full conversation on the @socialcohesiontech.bsky.social Substack: bit.ly/4neJfi5

24.10.2025 14:13 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Which also isn't great for the platforms. Hank Green quote: "If platforms don't prioritize high quality content, they dig their own graves. And Facebook has a lot of shovels."

Long term, it's not in the a platforms interest to push mildly engaging slop. Keeping an eye on FBs WVCR in the meantime...

12.05.2025 18:13 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Maybe AI Slop Is Killing the Internet, After All The assertion that bots are choking off human life online has never seemed more true.

Great article by @issielapowsky.bsky.social about the impact AI content is already having. Even if the "dead internet theory" isn't 100% true, if platforms don't properly disencentivize AI content, it can still hurt online publishing and content creators.

www.bloomberg.com/news/article...

12.05.2025 18:13 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Better Feeds: Algorithms That Put People First – Knight-Georgetown Institute

🚨 NEW REPORT – Better Feeds: Algorithms That Put People First 🚨
As policymakers around the globe grapple with addressing concerns about algorithms, KGI’s new report offers guidance on improving the design of algorithmic systems that shape billions of users’ digital lives.
bit.ly/3QzxVzq

04.03.2025 13:00 β€” πŸ‘ 23    πŸ” 19    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 10
Preview
Integrity Institute Releases New Transparency Resources β€” Integrity Institute The Integrity Institute is excited to share three new resources designed to advance transparency and improve risk assessment practices in the platform ecosystem. These reports analyze current transparency efforts and provide guidance on how to obtain meaningful transparency from social platforms.

Excited to share 3 new resources designed to advance transparency & improve risk assessment practices in the platform ecosystem. These reports analyze current transparency efforts & provide guidance on how to obtain meaningful transparency from social platforms.

Read here: integrityinstitute.o...

27.02.2025 18:00 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
As Facebook Abandons Fact-Checking, It’s Also Offering Bonuses for Viral Content Meta decided to stop working with U.S. fact-checkers at the same time as it’s revamping a program to pay bonuses to creators with high engagement numbers, potentially pouring accelerant on the kind of...

New from me: Meta decided to stop working with U.S. fact-checkers at the same time as it’s revamping a program to pay bonuses to creators with high engagement numbers, potentially pouring accelerant on the kind of false posts the company once policed: www.propublica.org/article/face...

24.02.2025 14:17 β€” πŸ‘ 1509    πŸ” 633    πŸ’¬ 96    πŸ“Œ 84

Haha!

@integrity-inst.bsky.social

But we haven’t really turned on the microphone yet here πŸ™ˆ

14.01.2025 21:21 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ‘€πŸ”Ž Last week Big Tech companies published their first reports of how they assess the systemic risks of their platforms to users under the EU’s Digital Services Act. Here’s what we’ve found so far: 🧡

03.12.2024 13:31 β€” πŸ‘ 25    πŸ” 13    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 3

We're assembling a starter pack of Tech Policy Press contributors on Bluesky! Follow the folks in our community for perspectives on a range of issues at the intersection of technology and democracy!

11.11.2024 21:28 β€” πŸ‘ 230    πŸ” 92    πŸ’¬ 18    πŸ“Œ 7
KGI Comments to the European Commission on Guidelines to Enforce the Protection of Minors Online - Knight–Georgetown Institute October 29, 2024By Peter Chapman and Zander Arnao The European Commission recently requested evidence to inform the development of Guidelines on the protection of minors online under the Digital Servi...

Platform design choices impact the privacy, safety, and security of minors online. Independent research shows that content-agnostic design changes can support prosocial interactions and user well-being.

Learn more in KGI’s recent submission to the European Commission: shorturl.at/B00Jz

29.10.2024 14:44 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1

With @mattmotyl.bsky.social , Jenn Louie, Spencer Gurley, and Sofia Bonilla.

www.linkedin.com/in/jennslouie
www.linkedin.com/in/spencergu...
www.linkedin.com/in/sofia-g-b...

02.10.2024 15:11 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Making Social Media Safer Requires Meaningful Transparency | TechPolicy.Press The authors argue that meaningful transparency requires companies to disclose the total number of exposures to violating content, not just the prevalence.

New piece in @techpolicypress.bsky.social from me and others the Integrity Institute!

Want a safer social media? Then we need more transparency from the platforms about the scale, cause, and nature of harms. A key way to change the incentives of the companies.

www.techpolicy.press/making-socia...

02.10.2024 15:07 β€” πŸ‘ 12    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Check out the Safe by Default report from Panoptykon, which discusses concrete changes platforms can make to move from engagement based design and ranking towards more human centric recommender systems.

panoptykon.org/sites/defaul...

06.03.2024 19:42 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Really excited to see the Non-Engagement Con paper come out! This represents broad consensus views about ranking and recommendations from a lot of experts on all kinds of ranking and recommendation systems.

arxiv.org/abs/2402.06831

13.02.2024 18:48 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Searching for sensitive topics on Instagram often surfaces harmful content, but doing the same search on Google doesn't. Why? One ranks search results based on engagement, and one ranks them based on quality and relevance. Interesting analysis here from the Integrity Institute's Jeff Allen πŸ‘‡

13.02.2024 17:49 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Why is Instagram search so much more harmful than Google search?

New article from me on Instagram's decision to completely block searches for sensitive topics, on the Integrity Institute blog.

integrityinstitute.org/blog/why-is-...

13.02.2024 13:52 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

Big thanks to @katieharbath.bsky.social and Glenn Ellingson for being leaders in that work, and to the dozens of members who contributed!

Check out all our elections program work here:
integrityinstitute.org/elections-in...

08.02.2024 22:49 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The EC cited Integrity Institute work multiple times in their guidance to platforms on protecting elections!

Exciting moment! That is the result of a year of work by our community putting together our recommended best practices on election integrity.

digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/comm...

08.02.2024 22:48 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Exploring the Depths of Online Safety: A Critical Analysis from the US Senate Judiciary Hearing β€” ... On January 31, 2024, the US Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on child safety online. Prior to the hearing, Integrity Institute released a list of recommendations on how platforms could bett...

The Integrity Institute has been very active on all things child safety, leading into the Senate hearing yesterday. Check out the recap!

integrityinstitute.org/blog/child-s...

And the preread ICYMI:

integrityinstitute.org/blog/child-s...

01.02.2024 17:56 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
What do we do about Telegram? β€” Integrity Institute

Read our full summary of the investigation here:

integrityinstitute.org/news/institu...

And the Wired article here:

www.wired.com/story/telegr...

28.11.2023 18:14 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It remains available in the app stores, and it wasn't in the list of platforms that will be regulated as VLOPs under the DSA. Telegram apparently reported that their monthly user count was below the threshold, but that just doesn't seem plausible and the EC is thankfully looking into it.

28.11.2023 18:14 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

This poses a real challenge to societies: What do we do when a platform that is perfectly happy distributing violent content hits a billion users?

Telegram is my go-to example of why government regulation of social media platforms is necessary. But so far, it's been able to evade accountability.

28.11.2023 18:13 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

And of course, the "restricting" of the channels is super leaky. There's plenty of examples of messages from restricted channels being shared in non-restricted channels. As with most solutions to problems on social media that attack the problems at a superficial level, it just doesn’t work!

28.11.2023 18:12 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Which is very strange! I will never understand thinking like "Oh, this channel has racist terms right in the channel name and lots of hateful messages about various ethnic groups. We definitely want to hide this from Google and Apple, but let's keep it on the platform."

28.11.2023 18:12 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Telegram hides lots of hate and violence filled channels from displaying on the version of the app from the Apple App Store and Google Play, but still keeps them on the platform and they are visible in a special "unrestricted" version of Telegram they put out, as well as the web browser version.

28.11.2023 18:10 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Telegram’s Bans on Extremist Channels Aren't Really Bans A WIRED analysis of more than 100 restricted channels shows these communities remain active, and content shared within them often spreads to channels accessible to the public.

What do we do about Telegram?

New research investigation from the Integrity Institute and Wired out today:

www.wired.com/story/telegr...

and our summary here

integrityinstitute.org/news/institu...

28.11.2023 18:09 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@jeffallen is following 20 prominent accounts