Jess Hagman

When people have asked me about thoughts on AI & qualitative data, this has been at the top of my list. Sobering to see proof of concept.
Lots of research needed on what (de-identified?) human subject data we can still publish under which conditions.

Can ChatGPT generate me a file with all the references from a bibliography I have in word? I tried this out because I'd heard from multiple sources that it could, and I teach and use software for managing references, and this would be a really useful thing to be able to do. #medlibs (thread)

Slide: Researchers and AI: Survey Findings Text: OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Researchers and Al: Survey Findings aby Boomers & Gen X have a larger proportion of 'Pioneers', whereas Millennials have a larger proportion of 'Challengers' % of each researcher profile per generation *bar graph: baby boomers and Gen X both described as 8% “challengers”; for millennials, the number is 17%* It should be noted that 'generation' was not asked directly; it was calculated using reported age. The sample is smaller as the 40-49 years' age category cut across the generation bands and was therefore excluded from this reporting. The remaining groups were categorized into broad generational bands using the following age categories: Millennials: Up to 39 years Generation X: 50 - 59 years Baby Boomers: 60 - 79 years Silent Generation: 80+ years N=1,416 14

Slide: Researchers and AI: survey findings. Text: OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Researchers and Al: Survey Findings Early Career Researchers have a larger proportion of 'Challengers' % of each researcher profile per career stage *bar graph giving breakdown of percentage of early-career vs. mid- and late-career academic attitudes. 16% or ECRs are designated “challengers” vs 12% (mid) and 8% (late)* Generally across career stages there are similar proportions of each researcher profile, the exception being a larger proportion of 'Challengers' in the Early Career Research category, compared to other career stages. Career Stage was based on self-reported categorization of 'early, 'mid", or late. N=2,088 15

Interesting survey on attitudes toward AI among academics. One thing that struck me: millennials (vs Gen X and boomers) and early-career researchers are *more* likely to distrust AI. fdslive.oup.com/www.oup.com/...

...after thinking more about using mental models in the @carpentries.carpentries.org instructor training.

I've always struggled with how to talk about #qda in an hour given the huge range of ways that people do qual work. But I've found it helpful to make use of a couple of mental models of the research process, types of qualitative quality, and levels of analysis strategies...

LibGuides: Qualitative Data Analysis: Planning Your Analysis Resources on conducting qualitative data analysis

New slides and recording of my workshop on planning #Qualitative data analysis.

@benpatrickwill.bsky.social @emilymbender.bsky.social @cfiesler.bsky.social

I suspected it was a publisher platform issue. Thanks for confirming

the set design and choreography was so beautiful that it was irrelevant that I’m a dummy who can’t understand Spanish

New plan: every time I feel despair about politics, go search for whatever Mamdani is up to that day.

I want to read pretty much everything in @criticalai-journal.bsky.social but there doesn't seem to be a PDF or other full text download option. Reader view and print to PDFs are not formatted well either. What am I missing?

Exciting looking cfp for #qualitative researchers

😭😭😭😭😭😭

ooh, yay, new @zotero.org! www.zotero.org/blog/zotero-8/

#qualitative

#qualitative

#qualitative

So excited to see these new lessons in development from @carpentries.carpentries.org for open #qualitative research.

librarycarpentry.github.io/lc-qualitati... for Taguette
librarycarpentry.github.io/lc-qualitati... for QualCoder

#qualitative

Looking for data that the government is pulling down? We may have it backed up for you. Check our portal: portal.datarescueproject.org

Know of data being taken down or worried about a data source? Let us know: baserow.datarescueproject.org/form/r7V1c44...

This is not to be missed! Such an illustrious group of people advocating for public data.

Like a call for the journal on their webpage? I'm not sure how this product relates to overall Springer brand content (which is massive). But it may be worth reaching to your library folks, especially if it's a journal they subscribe to.

Yikes. Did you get this when on your campus or going through a library full text link?

Example of #qualitative data synthesis. I appreciate the detain in how the studies were analyzed here, using both a spreadsheet and NVivo.

Title: The future of reflexivity in practice: building a collective methodological agenda by Audrey Alejandro -Reflexivity is increasingly recognized as a cornerstone of high-quality research, yet methodological guidance on how to do reflexivity in practice remains limited. Drawing on emerging initiatives to operationalize reflexivity, three priorities for advancing a collective agenda are identified — turning reflexivity into a teachable, actionable set of methods.

🔭 What’s the future of reflexivity & how do we put it into practice? New article in @natrevmethodsprimers.nature.com
I argue for three priorities 1) evaluation criteria 2) studying reflexivity as a socio-cognitive phenomenon 3) adapting it across research traditions
OA: rdcu.be/eX79L

CDS received 584 submissions in 2025; 108 of these were rejected for AI generated or revised content.

Hi #qualitative folks. We've extended the deadline for this CFP on the behinds the scenes process of QDA to Jan 9!

Screenshot of a paper entry: Fictional Failures and Real-World Lessons: Ethical Speculation Through Design Fiction on Emotional Support Conversational AI Authors: Faye Kollig, Jessica Pater, Fayika Farhat Nova, Casey Fiesler (There are tabs with "abstract" and "summary" and "summary" is selected.)

The ACM Digital Library, where a LOT of computing-related research is published (I'd say at least 75% of my own publications), is now not only providing (without consent of the authors and without opt-in by readers) AI-generated summaries of papers, but they appear as the *default* over abstracts.

📚

I love the confident tone of: oh, oops, my bad this time I"ll produce something "refined, highly reliable." And then not.