Jess Hagman

Jess Hagman

@hagman.bsky.social

Librarian @ U of Illinois. Interested in #qualitative technology and methods learning. Perpetually novice crafter. she/her #UIUC QDA guide: http://go.illinois.edu/qda

663 Followers 755 Following 208 Posts Joined Jul 2023
20 hours ago
Keep calm and be transparent: advice from scientists who retracted their papers Retractions correct the scientific record, but they have stigma attached to them. Some in the research community want that to change.

We're thrilled to announce the Ctrl-Z Award, a US$2,500 prize for researchers “who discover substantial errors in their published work and take meaningful steps to correct the scientific record."
Covered by @nature.com today; read more here: centerforscientificintegrity.org/2026/03/10/a...

393 163 4 17
1 day ago

Hi #Skybrarians #AcademicSky #ResearchSky - it looks like I'm going to be trying to organize social activities for a virtual conference. Do you have any experiences where this has worked well, as attendee or organizer? 📚

1 0 0 0
4 days ago

Also, not for nothing, but the more places that use them, the harder the make it on actual reference chat staff who then get treated like bots on chat and even sometimes phone because people will refuse to believe we’re real and treat us like humans. Infuriating every time.

20 7 3 1
4 days ago
Preview
Announcing the Spring 2026 Presentations on Qualitative Data Analysis IASSIST is an international organization of professionals working in and with information technology and data services to support research and teaching in the social sciences and beyond.

Hello #qualitative folks! @iassistdata.bsky.social is once again hosting a series on qual data analysis practices and technology: iassistdata.org/blog/2026/03.... Hope to see you there. #caqdas #QDA #qual

0 0 0 0
5 days ago
Preview
Can AI Replace Social Science Researchers? No. No it can't. Come on, now.

Fantastic work from @davekarpf.bsky.social putting some perspective on the notion that AI can do social science research. It can generate passable journal articles, which is not necessarily the same thing. It's a chance to consider what we should be valuing. davekarpf.beehiiv.com/p/can-ai-rep...

46 18 2 3
1 week ago

When people have asked me about thoughts on AI & qualitative data, this has been at the top of my list. Sobering to see proof of concept.
Lots of research needed on what (de-identified?) human subject data we can still publish under which conditions.

4 2 0 0
2 weeks ago

Can ChatGPT generate me a file with all the references from a bibliography I have in word? I tried this out because I'd heard from multiple sources that it could, and I teach and use software for managing references, and this would be a really useful thing to be able to do. #medlibs (thread)

33 16 10 8
3 weeks ago
Slide: Researchers and AI: Survey Findings

Text: OXFORD
UNIVERSITY PRESS
Researchers and Al: Survey Findings
aby Boomers & Gen X have a larger proportion of 'Pioneers', whereas Millennials have a larger proportion of 'Challengers'
% of each researcher profile per generation

*bar graph: baby boomers and Gen X both described as 8% “challengers”; for millennials, the number is 17%*

It should be noted that 'generation' was not asked directly; it was calculated using reported age. The sample is smaller as the 40-49 years' age category cut across the generation bands and was therefore excluded from this reporting.
The remaining groups were categorized into broad generational bands using the following age categories:
Millennials: Up to 39 years
Generation X: 50 - 59 years
Baby Boomers: 60 - 79 years
Silent Generation: 80+ years
N=1,416
14 Slide: Researchers and AI: survey findings.  Text: OXFORD
UNIVERSITY PRESS
Researchers and Al: Survey Findings
Early Career Researchers have a larger proportion of 'Challengers'
% of each researcher profile per career stage
 
*bar graph giving breakdown of percentage of early-career vs. mid- and late-career academic attitudes. 16% or ECRs are designated “challengers” vs
12% (mid) and 8% (late)*

Generally across career stages there are similar proportions of each researcher profile, the exception being a larger proportion of 'Challengers' in the Early Career Research category, compared to other career stages.
Career Stage was based on self-reported categorization of 'early, 'mid", or late.
N=2,088
15

Interesting survey on attitudes toward AI among academics. One thing that struck me: millennials (vs Gen X and boomers) and early-career researchers are *more* likely to distrust AI. fdslive.oup.com/www.oup.com/...

75 25 11 5
3 weeks ago

...after thinking more about using mental models in the @carpentries.carpentries.org instructor training.

1 0 0 0
3 weeks ago

I've always struggled with how to talk about #qda in an hour given the huge range of ways that people do qual work. But I've found it helpful to make use of a couple of mental models of the research process, types of qualitative quality, and levels of analysis strategies...

0 0 1 0
3 weeks ago
Preview
LibGuides: Qualitative Data Analysis: Planning Your Analysis Resources on conducting qualitative data analysis

New slides and recording of my workshop on planning #Qualitative data analysis.

1 0 1 0
3 weeks ago

@benpatrickwill.bsky.social @emilymbender.bsky.social @cfiesler.bsky.social

1 1 0 0
1 month ago

I suspected it was a publisher platform issue. Thanks for confirming

1 0 0 0
1 month ago

the set design and choreography was so beautiful that it was irrelevant that I’m a dummy who can’t understand Spanish

3,499 234 43 24
1 month ago

New plan: every time I feel despair about politics, go search for whatever Mamdani is up to that day.

2 1 0 0
1 month ago

I want to read pretty much everything in @criticalai-journal.bsky.social but there doesn't seem to be a PDF or other full text download option. Reader view and print to PDFs are not formatted well either. What am I missing?

2 0 1 0
1 month ago

Exciting looking cfp for #qualitative researchers

3 2 0 0
1 month ago

😭😭😭😭😭😭

0 0 0 0
1 month ago
Zotero Blog » Blog Archive » Zotero 8 Zotero is a free, easy-to-use tool to help you collect, organize, cite, and share research.

ooh, yay, new @zotero.org! www.zotero.org/blog/zotero-8/

0 0 0 1
1 month ago

#qualitative

1 0 0 0
1 month ago

#qualitative

0 0 0 0
1 month ago

#qualitative

0 0 0 0
1 month ago

So excited to see these new lessons in development from @carpentries.carpentries.org for open #qualitative research.

librarycarpentry.github.io/lc-qualitati... for Taguette
librarycarpentry.github.io/lc-qualitati... for QualCoder

6 5 0 0
1 month ago

#qualitative

0 0 0 0
1 month ago

Looking for data that the government is pulling down? We may have it backed up for you. Check our portal: portal.datarescueproject.org

Know of data being taken down or worried about a data source? Let us know: baserow.datarescueproject.org/form/r7V1c44...

48 41 0 1
1 month ago

This is not to be missed! Such an illustrious group of people advocating for public data.

9 5 0 0
1 month ago

Like a call for the journal on their webpage? I'm not sure how this product relates to overall Springer brand content (which is massive). But it may be worth reaching to your library folks, especially if it's a journal they subscribe to.

0 0 2 0
1 month ago

Yikes. Did you get this when on your campus or going through a library full text link?

0 0 2 0
1 month ago

Example of #qualitative data synthesis. I appreciate the detain in how the studies were analyzed here, using both a spreadsheet and NVivo.

0 0 0 0
2 months ago
Title: The future of reflexivity in practice: building a collective methodological agenda by Audrey Alejandro -Reflexivity is increasingly recognized as a cornerstone of high-quality research, yet methodological guidance on how to do reflexivity in practice remains limited. Drawing on emerging initiatives to operationalize reflexivity, three priorities for advancing a collective agenda are identified — turning reflexivity into a teachable, actionable set of methods.

🔭 What’s the future of reflexivity & how do we put it into practice? New article in @natrevmethodsprimers.nature.com
I argue for three priorities 1) evaluation criteria 2) studying reflexivity as a socio-cognitive phenomenon 3) adapting it across research traditions
OA: rdcu.be/eX79L

13 5 1 1