Exactly. Now you understand why 3000 people stood outside the courthouse cheering when the verdict was announced. The support was always about the injustice. It was frightening to watch.
24.06.2025 23:42 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@susancilone.bsky.social
I care. Deeply. That is why I will not give up the fight for democracy.
Exactly. Now you understand why 3000 people stood outside the courthouse cheering when the verdict was announced. The support was always about the injustice. It was frightening to watch.
24.06.2025 23:42 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Verdict is in. Free Karen Read.
Bring in the Jury.
Karen Read Trial
Understood. Right there with you.
18.06.2025 16:24 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0We will wait for you!
14.06.2025 02:10 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Great point! Yes.
13.06.2025 03:33 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Exactly.
13.06.2025 01:04 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0At every turn, the CW doubles down on their persecution of KR. You are right.
13.06.2025 01:04 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Karen Read Trial
How can the jury trust the CW evidence when:
1. Shoe mislabeled bag incident
2. Dog DNA evidence was mentioned, but never brought into evidence.
3. Shirt-hole lies
If you can not present the evidence without chain of custody issues,
tampering issues, and lies during the trialβ¦
Hankβs closing:
In real life, details matter. Inevitably, you need peer reviewed documents. You must consider the DNA that was not found or presented and ignore Dr. Laposata, Dr. Wolfe and the ham sandwich Dr. Rentschler ate last year.Also, you have to wonder why Randyβs arm was not blue.
#KarenRead
Thank you, Dr. Rentschler. Thank you, Dr. Laposata. Thank you, Dr. Wolf. Thank you, Dr. Russell.
The science doesnβt lie. (Hank does) John was not hit by a car. A car did not hit John. #KarenRead is innocent. Bring in the jury!
The qualities of a good prosecutor are as elusive and as impossible to define as those which mark a gentleman. And those who need to be told
would not understand it anyway. The Federal Prosecutor
April 1, 1940
Robert H. Jackson
#HankBrennan will never understand!
Hank Brennan, stop lying! You have lied from the moment you stepped into the Karen Read trial. I am not buying your mistake, Hank. You are a vile embarrassment
09.06.2025 23:11 β π 33 π 4 π¬ 1 π 0Yes, you should dig in. This is unlike any other trial. Catch up, we will wait for you.
01.06.2025 21:12 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Yes. Ironic, but not surprising. They had just returned from a funeral/memorial for fallen officers they had never met. The respect isβ¦expected.
30.05.2025 12:31 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I have been following this case for a year and a half. I canβt look away. Karen Read is all of us, and I can not stop watching until she is found not guilty. They have no case, but they are going all in.
30.05.2025 02:00 β π 7 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Agree!
29.05.2025 03:15 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0ipse dixit Welcher has no idea he was using data from the wrong key cycle. When your ego stands in the way, you just might get blue grease paint all over your arm. Karen Read Trial, Day 22
28.05.2025 23:02 β π 9 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0Love your snark, butter biscuit. β€οΈ
22.05.2025 12:47 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Endless thoughts on the Karen Read Trial. Today: Have you asked yourself where two military/police veterans would leave Johnβs body? A fallen cop.
Under a flag pole?
The defense.
20.05.2025 22:59 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0That is where I believe Higgins was. If he stood near or in the breezeway door to the garage, he could have easily ambushed John just as he tried to go in the house. Pull John into the garage and several people and a dog jump him. Fits the evidence. John was not hit by a car. Keep watching.
10.05.2025 02:26 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Watching. Following since pre-trial motions prior to Trial 1.0
29.04.2025 02:14 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Karen is any one of us. If this can happen to her, it can happen to anyone. Watch the trial, learn the facts. She did not hit John with her car. The MSP did not investigate, they accused her and then orchestrated a narrative. This is bigger than Karen. You should care.
29.04.2025 02:12 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Reasonable doubt is abundant. It will become clear that a car did not hit John. At that point, you know she is factually innocent.
27.04.2025 12:12 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Trial 2.0 is off to a fiery start. The witnesses seem to be modifying their testimony in triplicate. Impeachment is the word for day 1. ARCCA voice dire is very important. They prove John was not hit by a car.
23.04.2025 02:02 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Watching. I watched first trial and all hearings. I have been following since January of 2024.
22.04.2025 23:24 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Not guilty. A car did not hit John OKeefe.
22.04.2025 23:21 β π 7 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0"Within minutes after DOGE accessed the NLRB's systems, someone with an IP address in Russia started trying to log in. The attempts were 'near real-time'...
"Whoever was attempting to log in was using one of the newly created DOGE accounts..."
www.npr.org/2025/04/15/n...
Thank you!
01.04.2025 10:19 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Yes, the trial will be televised. Many lawtubers will cover it as well as CourtTV. When you watch the trial, it will be clear that she did not hit John.
23.03.2025 00:48 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0