I don't think it's a fair assessment of the situation. Have a good day.
04.03.2026 04:50 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0@akoustov.bsky.social
Prof at Notre Dame (alexanderkustov.org). Author of "In Our Interest: How Democracies Can Make Immigration Popular" (http://tinyurl.com/4rwpr6dc). Writing at "Popular by Design" (http://tinyurl.com/b93bwr9j).
I don't think it's a fair assessment of the situation. Have a good day.
04.03.2026 04:50 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0As an antidote to the clickbait boosterist nonsense flying around BlueSky about LLMs replacing human social scientists already, here is an actual serious article about the use of GenAI in social science research.
04.03.2026 04:28 β π 2 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0
I... agree?
bsky.app/profile/akou...
Thank you for your constructive feedback. I hope you have a good evening.
04.03.2026 03:05 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Nice. I saw this paper before it was cool :)
04.03.2026 03:04 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0My take on the partisan expressive responding literature is now in print. Open access: doi.org/10.1017/S000...
03.03.2026 13:49 β π 35 π 11 π¬ 2 π 1Genuine question: why do anonymous accounts always feel the need to be this negative? Go outside, enjoy your evening.
04.03.2026 03:02 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0You can just ask Claude Code to do this using the Claude Chrome extension. I did it more as an experiment since it doesn't seem to save much time compared to doing it manually, at least not yet.
04.03.2026 01:58 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
Can I just commend @jatucker.bsky.social and @solmg.bsky.social for writing a much better version of my viral argument for academics to wake up on agentic AIβwith concrete use examples, no unnecessary provocation or AI-generated text, and a more constructive vision for the future.
Read it!
Google Trends chart showing interest in commercial coding agents increasing dramatically in early 2026
You can just research things. New from @jatucker.bsky.social & me at @brookings: Coding agents like Claude Code and Codex will likely accelerate research AND undermine institutional structures we built to support it.
03.03.2026 23:15 β π 16 π 6 π¬ 1 π 5Thanks for this thread, very insightful. And I appreciate a constructive reply.
03.03.2026 22:06 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I didn't edit the post I saw being generated before posting it, but added a few changes afterwards. It's really not that crazy if you think about it for a bit.
03.03.2026 21:58 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I did, but decided not to change anything.
03.03.2026 21:20 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 1What do you think?
03.03.2026 21:05 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0lol
03.03.2026 20:56 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I'm sorry if this post (or reading it) offended you in any way. Genuinely. That was not my intention.
03.03.2026 20:55 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
I respect thatβresearch gives much joy too. But I also want to know the truth about how migration works so more people can flourish.
We still know so little. I don't care if an important finding comes from a human or AI, as long as it's accurate. Our job is to move the frontier, not self-actualize
Interesting papers and posts on AI. Robert Frank is about to get very fashionable (again?).
Social Dynamics of AI Adoption --> www.nber.org/papers/w34488
causalinf.substack.com/p/claude-cod...
Yes! We should all be thinking and discussing this now. Not tomorrow. I don't have any solutions yet, but I'm working on it.
03.03.2026 17:59 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I edited it slightly after posting. I added the period that you catched, the Cairo thing, and a few people to acknowledge that Claude forgot to include.
03.03.2026 17:57 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 1I also do have a detailed style guide in the folder trained on my own writing, with preferences on the use of em dashes and such. I don't have anything on using periods, though this was certainly a bit weird.
03.03.2026 17:26 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Sure thing. I use the native Claude app on Windows connected to my GitHub, and ask Claude Code (Opus 4.6) to do things following procedures I've established in claude. md. In this case, I asked it to put together a ~10 theses post based on my previous social media takes, and post it on substack.
03.03.2026 17:25 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 3 π 0Yes!
03.03.2026 17:21 β π 9 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0That's fair, Rachel. I probably overplayed the provocation and underplayed the nuance. But if this nudges my colleague across the hall -- who was recently amused that AI can now make slide decks -- to try Claude Code and rethink their research workflow, I'll take it as a win.
03.03.2026 17:21 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 6 π 0It was based on my earlier personal take from twitter, so I can certainly personally own it :)
03.03.2026 17:14 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Hm... thanks for catching this. I have not instructed Claude to make any mistakes. It may be an omission from their Chrome browser extension, I guess?
03.03.2026 17:12 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0For the sake of transparency since Iβve been talking this thing up, a false negative:
03.03.2026 17:05 β π 9 π 1 π¬ 5 π 1LOL
03.03.2026 16:58 β π 28 π 2 π¬ 2 π 1LOL
03.03.2026 16:57 β π 22 π 0 π¬ 10 π 1I personally plan to be 100% transparent about my own workflow. The question is whether the discipline will be too.
03.03.2026 16:53 β π 6 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0