I read the book quite a while ago. No spoilers! 😁🤫
That's irrelevant. He said they've destroyed 100% of Iran's military. 100% is all of it, no matter how big it is. 🤷🤫
But he still hasn't worked out percentages. 🤫
Having destroyed 100% of Iran's military, they can still send drones and missiles, and lay mines. 🤦
This is pretty much what Peter Mandelson is being prosecuted for in the UK.
Misconduct in public office. 🤷
TRUMP: I THINK PUTIN MAY BE HELPING IRAN A BIT
Watch for Trump to sue the French TV channel for defamation for juxtaposing the two images.
While calling him a paedophile is met with silence. 🤫
So it will be the 9th (not a) war that he's stopped.
It's both a war, and not a war, and his cult falls for it.
It's harder for the tax man to track 😁
Many small businesses I know would rather card payments, because paying cash into the bank costs them more than the card charges do. 🤷
I think I've probably used a bank note once in the past month and maybe a coin at some point too to get a supermarket trolley.
Amazing how much energy is being spent this week by the right of British politics on something that is rapidly becoming an irrelevance
Why is the Paedophile in Chief negotiating on behalf of multinational businesses? Surely it's for the parties to a contract to negotiate the price?
The question remains; why?
Yes, the US could spend a Trillion dollars, and completely wiped out Iran, but why? What do they gain?
I wouldn't buy a AAA battery from Tesla!
Has she given up her UK passport? If yes, then she needs to be treated like any other foreigner. If no, she she should be billed for back tax.
But this post is talking about using it to force through legislation. That's the opposite of a filibuster.
In the UK occasionally the government will use the "guillotine" to limit debate. Usually if the law is something that they campaigned on and was in their election manifesto.
There's absolutely no guarantee they'd have won, and even if they did, it would probably cost a lot more than they paid him. It makes me angry that his dishonesty appears to have been rewarded, but in fairness, if they'd fought it, they'd still be criticised.
Even if fighting the case cost £100K, and they *still* had to pay Mandelson more than £75K?
It happens all the time in the business sector as well. If I had £1 for every time I've advised a business, to pay, because they want to fight a case "on principle", even though they could win, and it would still cost a lot more than simply paying a complainant to go away. 🤷
Yes. The "We agree with you on ... What are you going to do about ...?" approach is definitely better.
Once again, Ed Davey shows that he is better at questioning the Prime Minister with his two questions than Kemi Badenoch is with her six questions. #PMQs
‼️👀👆
Or he knows he'd lose. The first defence against defamation is that the claim was true. 🤫
Has Trump threatened to sue for defamation yet? 🤔
He's suing the BBC for broadcasting words he actually said! Surely he'll sue to prove he didn't rape a child!?
Did they bring along Steinway pianos for the campfire sing-along as well?
That petrol is 20p/L more expensive than my local garage.
This is the Trump who had to leave someone injured, because he felt sick at all the blood? That Trump?
A foreign one? Only police departments from countries other than the US are actually investigating.
What are the chances that the POTUS (Peadophile of The United States) committed sexual assault at his golf club in the UK?
Oh well, but at least we can agree? 🤫
Thank you Good Friday Agreement! 😂
