Legalized Theft = Disrupt the market + The poor panic + The rich buy it allโon sale.
09.04.2025 20:32 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0@adamchapman519.bsky.social
Helping retirees intentionally die with less. | Founder of www.yesmoney.ca | Hugger of trees | Self-proclaimed black sheep
Legalized Theft = Disrupt the market + The poor panic + The rich buy it allโon sale.
09.04.2025 20:32 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Just remember, narcissists never admit when they are wrong.
07.04.2025 00:36 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0There are some, but they are more expensive, and there are studies that have shown diverting money away from dirty companies actually makes them worse.
What I have clients do instead, donate the different in cost of regular fund for the ESG to a local charity that supports green initiatives.
When you jump back in, go with a globally diversified index instead of the S&P.
It will save you from ever doing this again. ;)
Honest question then for you: if you don't want them doing it, why are you?
Not to mention, with an annuity in place, if it covers your baseline retirement needs, you don't need to worry or react as much anyway.
And letโs say you bought the S&P 500 instead of the globally diversified portfolio Iโve already suggested.
For anyone who bought, holds it, and waits for recovery has lost nothing.
You donโt lose unless you sell.
But selling early and buying back in late cost actual return. Thatโs the point.
Cash on hand mean you missed part of the upswing leading up the current drop.
Thatโs not a gain in your favour.
Again, your logic is flawed.
Iโm not saying that all.
Iโm saying humans are horrible at investigating.
Timing the market, picking stocks, have a terribly negative effect on your returns.
Instead, a globally diversified passive equity portfolio will do everything you need without needing to guess and guess wrong.
Everyone said the same thing about Covid, the financial crisis, the dot com bubble, and on and on it goes.
None of it matter for those who stayed invested and did so passively.
Your logic is flawed.
Thatโs the point.
Thereโs no need to do what youโre doing and the nearly four decades of evidence demonstrates youโre the one harming yourself.
You think youโre being effective, and yet youโre costing yourself money long term.
And youโll miss the upswing like everyone who does the same continues to do.
Those who ride out miss nothing.
Itโs the whole point of passive investing for the long term. You donโt need to predict and risk being wrong. Because you, indeed, are wrong, and you just donโt know it.
When saving is the goal, the obstacle between you and saving money is you.
When it's finally time to spend money, the obstacle is still you.
Retirement is a whole new stage of lifeโone the path to retirement doesn't prepare us for.
I'm so pleased Meera Ramen took the time explore the kind of planning available beyond traditional portfolio management.
Thanks to @theglobeandmail.com for sharing.
www.theglobeandmail.com/investing/pe...
Love this!
Such a great conversation, Robb!
Situations like this make me want to scream.
11.02.2025 19:12 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Most advisors donโt have a clue how to produce retirement income.
Itโs why I had to give props to this guy for not trying, even though he could have chosen a better response.
PS โ If your advisor hesitates when you mention โusing your retirement assets,โ it might be time for a second opinion.
11.02.2025 15:12 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Retirement isnโt just mathโitโs emotion. A great advisor will discuss the fear of outliving your money, the guilt of spending hard-earned savings, and help you spend more while you still can.
Not all advisors deliver the same kind of advice. Ensure yours specializes in your phase of life.
If they can also talk you through the latest developments in retirement income research, you can hit them with a follow-up question.
โHow will you address the psychological challenges of spending my savings?โ
โWhatโs your experience with decumulation strategies?โ
A strong answer should include the limitations of the "4% rule," why dividends aren't a strategy, and the behavioural pitfalls of systems like Guyton Guardrails.
Retirement income planning demands distinct strategiesโtax efficiency and withdrawal sequencing while managing the risks of longevity and brevity.
Missteps here can cost you the retired life you promised yourself.
If youโre nearing retirement, ask your advisor:
I have to admitโI respect this advisor's self-awareness.
He didnโt pretend to know what he doesnโt.
I've seen this situation many times before.
Advisors who focus on growing wealth often lack the expertise to convert it into income.
Itโs like expecting a family physician to become a brain surgeon overnight: both are doctors, but only one has the specialized skills for the task.
I once spoke with a retiree with $2M in savings. When she asked her advisor, โHow do I start drawing income in retirement?โ he replied, โWhy would you take money out?โ
He manages her investments but has no plan for her retirement incomeโand worse, refused to help create one.
Before retirees buy a big insurance policy, remember, if you're healthy enough to qualify for insurance, you're healthy enough to use the money instead of leaving more behind.
My latest collaboration with Globe Advisor.
www.theglobeandmail.com/investing/gl...
Haha Iโm almost done writing it. Few more months of deep editing.
09.02.2025 20:55 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0You reach a point in life when saving money isn't your problem, it's spending it.
We simply call this stage retirement.
There are many reasons retirees fail to spend.
Don't miss your chance to use your retirement savings while you're still able to do so.
You can say YES to more trips.
You can say YES to giving more to your kids now (when it actually matters)
You can say YES to living more while you still can.
Every excuse preventing you from using your money, I've already solved, behaviourally and financially.