NWH2OKH

Bad spelling… sorry 🤣🤣🤣

Cancel X… I did last November!

Remember! Try not to buy anything tomorrow! Let’s see if we make a difference.

My entire family texted and our in agreement. We have both D and R and are done with this BS!

DCCC Scores Massive Palantir and SpaceX Lobbyist Cash Haul The House Democrats' campaign arm disclosed the money in a FEC filing accompanying its January contributions and disbursements.

readsludge.com/2025/02/24/d...
Is this you @hakeem-jeffries.bsky.social? You are now officially part of the problem.

@hakeem-jeffries.bsky.social … Hey Hakeem… did you actually just take money from Peter Thiel and Elon Musk for the DCCC? You have & you continue to be a failure at your job. We need someone we can fight behind that has our back. Shame on you!!!

NYT: “DOGE deleted the top five highest savings claims on its ‘wall of receipts’ leaderboard after variousnews outlets pointed out multiple errors in its calculations…” newrepublic.com/post/191973/...

I’m on WA State… I’d proudly go with Canada!!!

LETS GO CANADA!!!

A madman is in charge of the United States. God help us all.

🚨🚨🚨

NEW STATEMENT FROM NOVA SCOTIA PREMIER TIM HOUSTON ON RETALIATION TO TRUMP TARIFFS:

- Nova Scotia to limit business with U.S.

- Double tolls for commercial vehicles from the United States, effective February 3 at Cobequid Pass

- Remove all U.S. alcohol from shelves effective February 4.

Thank you for understanding! I feel the same except… I live in a blue state and will continue to purchase blue state products.

Trump says he's wants to privatize USPS because it's "unprofitable".

Reminder that the Post Office isn't a for-profit enterprise: it's a public service that guarantees everyone in America reliable, affordable, and universal mail service.

Another old white man 🙄.

I have Murray & Cantwell… they will hold strong against disastrous appointments also.

In stark contrast, Bluesky didn’t donate shit to Trump’s inaugural fund.

What in the fuck is this

85 years after naming Adolf Hitler as Time Person of the Year they are naming Donald Trump Time Person of the Year.

This is INFURIATING ayfkm

THEY ARE CONDONING AND
GLORIFYING A
TRAITOR
CONVICTED FELON
SEXUAL ABUSER
GRIFTER
WANNABE DICTATOR

MY GOD AMERICA
STOP

I’ve met him several times in person. In Jackson Hole WY, where he lived full time. I found him humble, kind and extremely generous. He may have an industry image but that is not him as a person.

Oh no!! Our friends over at @patriottakes.bsky.social have been suspended!

Patriot Takes does such important work exposing extremism and alerting folks to threats and scams. I’m sure this was a mistake.

@aaron.bsky.team @jay.bsky.team can you please assist in getting their account back?

Dear Mr. Sauer: I am writing in response to your letter dated November 26, 2024, regarding the above-referenced action. This Office will not stipulate to vacate the final judgment already entered by Supreme Court, New York County, in this action or otherwise seek to dismiss the action. As you know, this is a civil enforcement action under Executive Law § 63(12) against the Trump Organization, a business headquartered in New York, and its top executives concerning those defendants' fraudulent and unlawful actions to misleadingly inflate defendant Donald J. Trump's personal net worth in business transactions for the purpose of obtaining more favorable terms on loans and insurance policies than they otherwise would have received. This civil enforcement action was filed following a multiyear investigation by the Office, and multiple courts have rejected claims that the investigation or action were brought in anything other than good faith. See People v. Trump Org., Inc., 205 A.D.3d 625, 626-27 (1st Dep't 2022); Trump v. James, No. 1:21-1352, 2022 WL 1718951, at *12-14 (N.D.N.Y. May 27, 2022). Following summary judgment and an eleven-week bench trial, Supreme Court concluded that Mr. Trump and the other entity and individual defendants violated § 63(12). The court also entered final judgment ordering various forms of equitable relief. Defendants appealed from Supreme Court's post-trial final judgment. That appeal has been fully briefed and argued in the Appellate Division, First Department, and the parties are now awaiting a decision from the First Department. Your letter presents no basis for this Office to seek to vacate the final judgment or to dismiss this action. First, Mr. Trump's upcoming inauguration as the next President of the United States has no bearing on the pendency of defendants' appeal in this action. This civil enforcement

action is not a criminal action, and Supreme Court did not impose any criminal sanction on Mr. Trump or any other defendant. Accordingly, the various actions taken by the Special Counsel's office or the District Attorney's Office of New York County in the respective criminal cases brought by those offices against Mr. Trump are irrelevant here. Contrary to your suggestion, the pendency of defendants' appeal during Mr. Trump's term as President fully comports with the U.S. Constitution. The final judgment concerns only business conduct undertaken by entities that are part of the Trump Organization and individual defendants who were acting on behalf of the Trump Organization. The judgment thus does not concern any conduct related to Mr. Trump's first term as President. Nor does it implicate any conduct that Mr. Trump might undertake after his upcoming inauguration. Presidents do not have immunity from civil lawsuits arising from unofficial conduct, and such lawsuits may proceed while the President is in office. See Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 694 (1997); Zervos v. Trump, 171 A.D.3d 110, 128 (1st Dep't 2019); see also Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. 593, 615-16 (2024). Regardless, Mr. Trump's upcoming inauguration is irrelevant to the judgment rendered against the fourteen other defendants found liable by Supreme Court in this action. There is also no merit to your claim that the pendency of defendants' own appeal will impede Mr. Trump's official duties as President. The ordinary burdens of civil litigation do not impede the President's official duties in a way that violates the U.S. Constitution. See Clinton, 520 U.S. at 705-06; Zervos, 171 A.D.3d at 125-26. In any event, Mr. Trump does not face any such litigation burdens here. The trial is over, final judgment has been rendered, and defendants' appeal to the First Department has been fully submitted and argued. Mr. Trump's official duties will not be impeded while awaiting the First Department's decision. Nor wi…

The NY Attorney General has REJECTED Trump's bid to dismiss his $500M civil fraud judgment post-election. The AG stated that Trump's presidency doesn't shield him from civil litigation over non-official conduct, per the Constitution and multiple court precedents.

Not every drug addict with a severe mental illness is homeless.

Some own social media platforms and buy American elections.

Oh no, Donald! Please, whatever you do, don’t get rid of the electoral college! The libs would be owned so hard!

So when we remove birthright citizenship can we go by the mother? Because:

Don Jr was born in 1977
Ivanka was born in 1981
Eric was born in 1984

Ivana became a US citizen in 1988.

Barron was born in March 2006

Melania became a US citizen in July 2006.

Trump’s entire family would be deported.

New York City Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch has named 26 year-old Luigi Nicholas Mangione who was born and raised in Maryland, and most recently lived in Honolulu, Hawaii, as their person of interest in the death of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson.

I called Rep. Clyburn’s office this morning to give my disapproval of this terrible idea.

Please let his office know how you feel. Phone: (202) 225-3315

BREAKING NEWS:

Rep. Jim Clyburn urges President Biden to pardon Donald Trump in a show of national unity.

ABSO-FUCKING-LUTELY NOT!!!!

Who else agrees Trump should NEVER be pardoned?

Not sure I have enough words for how angry this makes me

People not elected to government should not have the power to reshape the government, especially people whose obscene wealth depends on the government functioning a certain way.

This is not a hot take.

It's just plain common sense.