No issue with tariff costs and demand changes? Using Bessent math, domestic source COGS and sales have to decline (because wages don’t go up because there is no money creation)
04.07.2025 09:35 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@bau.bsky.social
残り物には福がある。Trafiquant de l’ésoterique. Unverified(Ogre). Usually couth, sometimes kempt, often gruntled. Strong opinions held weekly.
No issue with tariff costs and demand changes? Using Bessent math, domestic source COGS and sales have to decline (because wages don’t go up because there is no money creation)
04.07.2025 09:35 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I would be really careful about making assumptions about the 30-40 curve differences between USD and JPY.
Implied marks are one thing. Trade-able levels are another.
Yau Ma Tei
23.05.2025 08:22 — 👍 8 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Workboat project going slowly. Got some big planks of hardwood to do more repairs. Have had other stuff to take care of.
02.05.2025 12:20 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Sunny day, long weekend, and post-lunch coffee in the breeze.
02.05.2025 05:32 — 👍 19 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Misty and gray.
05.04.2025 09:15 — 👍 9 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Done perfectly, there’s probably a non-public meme coin involved.
Vouchers = NADCoin.
Hand it out. Balk on details (Rug it). Elmo and friends buy it all. Then Trump reveals the rest of the plan.
Nads become huge.
LFG Nads!
The key is to crash the economy, raise unemployment, make everything expensive, blame it on Biden, then offer vouchers.
Offer to lower tariffs on countries who invest in American Dynamism SBA Bonds and establish Voluntary Export Restraints on VoucherCo Products.
Then Trump uses the rest of the tariff money to give New American Dynamism Grants to entrepreneurs (Elmo and oligarch voucher buyers) who support Trump (maybe a 20% stake for ‘advisory roles’).
Then USG makes the SBA go YUUGE (but non-recourse) for voucher owners.
I finally get it.
1) Raise tariffs.
2) Crash market.
3) USG gives $1000 to citizens in the form of New American Dynamism (NAD) Vouchers
Like Russian Privatisation Vouchers.
But for America.
4) Elmo/friends hold Trump 3 rallies, open voucher kiosks. Buy vouchers for $1100.
From Victor Klemperer's diary on 30 March 1933, two months to the day after the start of Hitler's chancellorship:
30.03.2025 15:36 — 👍 15 🔁 9 💬 0 📌 0None of the country’s top 20 law firms (and only 3 of the top 100) are willing to publicly oppose Trump’s attacks on law firms. @sindap.bsky.social 🎁🔗 giftarticle.ft.com/giftarticle/...
30.03.2025 15:25 — 👍 42 🔁 22 💬 5 📌 3He called automaker CEOs on the carpet to tell them not to raise prices. He thought he could bully them. Someone obviously told him differently. It’s a different tune 2 days later.
www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
He thinks exporters pay because it’s an import and it’s a cash payment at the border. He thinks of it as a payment - a royalty paid to the government - his government - to do business. The other guy pays in order to sell. So obviously, the foreigner pays. It’s that simple.
30.03.2025 15:36 — 👍 7 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0Why not production subsidies to spur a renaissance of manufacturing?
Ah, well… you see… that is cash out the door. That’s bad.
If he can get in and take a spread, why not. If it is another country selling cars, watches, whatever, ‘it’s very unfair and they are taking advantage of us.’
‘Negotiating’ with China to sell more ag products to them? That’s the salesman. ‘Buy more. I’ll get sales credit.’
Bully them into accepting less. If they take him to court, paper them to death then settle.
Money going out the door in return for service or goods is ‘very unfair and they are taking advantage of us.’ For everything. Anybody making something which Americans want to buy?
Tariffs are great! Look at the money coming in! It’s obviously great because if it weren’t there would be no money coming in. It would be going out. Others are complaining because they want to destroy America.
Historically he cheated contractors because it was money going out.
can’t do anything about it. There is no cost to tariffs. If imports come down so tariffs aren’t as big as 20% on 100% of old imports, that’s fine. 20% on 50% is still 10 of new money.
All the rest of what happens - business lost, jobs lost, costs higher, etc?
Fake news.
“Start a business”? Get someone else to put up equity. Someone else to put up debt. Someone else to run it. Take a royalty for the name. If it goes bankrupt, someone else’s problem. He got his royalty.
He likes tariffs because they are new money coming in where he thinks others
It helps to remember that he doesn’t ‘think like a businessman.’ He thinks like a grifter-rentier. Do a scam. It works. Do it until it doesn’t work. Try a new one.
But fundamentally, you advertise/market/bully someone into giving you cash. Get the cash. Move on.
cc @brokenbanker.bsky.social
Descriptive article about the attitudes, sycophancy, helplessness. Even the fully-sycophantic have no idea but they are all-in on what is still a moving target.
Why does he love tariffs? Because it is cash in an account he can call his.
www.politico.com/news/2025/03...
Dear Jason Cummins,
Attached is an article in the Financial Times, published yesterday.
I feel you should know that some asshole is putting your name on stupid articles.
Very truly yours, etc.
www.ft.com/content/1de4...
Remember… Miran was chief strategist for a hedge fund too…
27.03.2025 15:01 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 04. Did you make investments in Canada/Mexico assuming that MY deal EXPLICITLY containing a 5yr review would hold for five years? Yes?
25% tariff on all Mexican/Canadian content.
5. You made a mistake calculating the amount of Canadian/Mexican content?
25% tariff on the whole thing
* MEXICAN PRESIDENT SHEINBAUM: WITHIN A FREE TRADE AGREEMENT, THERE SHOULD NOT BE TARIFFS
@reuters.com
Diverse
Equity
Index
risk.
It’s everywhere.
Has that other place given up the ghost for good?
10.03.2025 14:29 — 👍 14 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0