The 1752 Group

CALL FOR PAPERS: Deadline on Monday!

FemIDEAS invite abstracts for their upcoming conference, 'Transforming Theory, Policy, and Practice: Decolonise Sexual and Gender-Based Violence in Higher Education.'

More info: femideas.com/conference

Submit here: docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...

As Anna notes, trans & non-binary people are facing a significant risk to their safety.

However, the judgement shows how provision of single-sex services is a political choice that depends on the relative power of different groups. The possibility for change through activism remains.

/End of 🧵

In considering any steps in response to this judgement, HEIs would do well to consider this guide from Gendered Intelligence: genderedintelligence.co.uk/page/how-to-...

As such, higher education institutions (HEIs) in England now have obligations to ensure that any steps they take following the EHCR guidance account for the heightened risk of sexual harassment and violence faced by trans and non-binary students, and indeed staff.

The OfS's new regulatory requirements are relevant here as they require HEIs to:

1) Address harassment on basis of gender reassignment,
2) Understand how students may be likely to experience harassment or sexual misconduct in order to address the issue.

www.officeforstudents.org.uk/for-provider...

In light of the evidence above, it is concerning that women’s safety is discussed in the EHCR consultation but safety of trans & non-binary people is not.

Trans and non-binary people would face the greatest increased risk to their safety & dignity compared to current policies.

Toilets have been shown to be a particularly risky space for trans & non-binary children at school and the risk increases where they are not allowed to use toilets that match their self-identified gender (including where they had to use single staff bathrooms instead).

This is well-established by national studies of:
180,000 students in the US,
8000 students in Ireland,
43,000 students in Australia

And also by studies of:
specifically staff-student sexual misconduct,
specific disciplines,
different campuses or sexual and gender minority groups.

Evidence from a wide range of international studies shows clearly that trans and non-binary people face much higher risks in relation to sexual harassment and assault than cis people, both men and women. This fact is entirely missing in the consultation version of the guidance.

Safety must shape policy on single-sex spaces Anna Bull examines how evidence of trans and non-binary people's heightened vulnerability to sexual violence is absent from new EHRC guidance on single-sex spaces Anna Bull examines how evidence of tr...

🏳️‍⚧️ We know unis are now updating their policies following the EHCR guidance on single-sex spaces.

Here, Anna Bull calls for decisions to be informed by strong evidence, & points to regulatory requirements for institutions to ensure safety of trans & non-binary students.

wonkhe.com/blogs/safety... 🧵

Sahana Arun Kumar from the Department of Education, University of York, responded to the toolkit from a postgraduate researcher perspective.

Watch from 40:15.

Guest speakers from the Uni of Bath brought notable examples of effective & replicable good practice, e.g. using anonymous reporting to obtain PGR-specific data, and the importance of completing investigations where possible, even when a reported staff member leaves mid-process.

Watch from 21:52.

Dr Anna Bull from The 1752 Group outlined Condition E6, from the new OfS regulatory requirements, and introduced our toolkit, designed for those implementing E6 in relation to postgraduate researchers.

E6: www.officeforstudents.org.uk/for-provider...

Toolkit: 1752group.com/wp-content/u...

YouTube video by The 1752 Group Addressing harassment and sexual misconduct experienced by postgraduate researchers - Toolkit launch

In case you missed it...

Watch our recent webinar on the latest OfS regulatory requirements and our new toolkit for addressing harassment and sexual misconduct experienced by postgraduate researchers.

Key points in 🧵!

www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDQb...

In this comment piece in @wonkhe.bsky.social, Anna Bull and toolkit co-creator Kelly Prince outline the specific risks and challenges faced by PGRs when it comes to sexual misconduct and harassment, and the ways our toolkit addresses these.

wonkhe.com/blogs/how-to...

PhD students face high risk of sexual harassment — can universities stop perpetrators? A toolkit outlines how academia can prevent various forms of misconduct.

Internationally-renowned publication Nature featured this comment piece by The 1752 Group's Dr Anna Bull on how the toolkit can support staff and higher education institutions to prevent sexual misconduct and harassment experienced by PGRs:
www.nature.com/articles/d41...

Our toolkit, developed in collaboration with the UK Council for Graduate Education (UKCGE), addresses a potential gap in regulatory and legal requirements. It provides thorough guidance tailored specifically for the PGR community.

The the new regulatory requirements by the Office for Students and the Worker Protection Act mark a pivotal moment for higher ed institutions (HEIs) in England. They mandate that HEIs take key steps to prevent & respond to harassment & sexual misconduct.

Our work has fed into this development.

The isolated nature of their work can make it harder for PGRs to report misconduct or harassment and find appropriate support. Exposing harassment or misconduct can also have significant career consequences.

The specific experiences of postgrad researchers (PGRs) can be overlooked. But PGRs can be more vulnerable to harassment & sexual misconduct due to power imbalances with supervisors, a lack of shared understandings of professional boundaries (e.g. in conferences, fieldwork) and academic isolation.

⚠️ Did you know the new regulatory requirements from the OfS on Harassment and Sexual Misconduct came into force on 1st August?

For those implementing E6, we've launched a toolkit, tailored to help address the unique risks in this area for the doctoral community: 1752group.com/wp-content/u...

🧵!

Join the mailing list to stay up to date with our work to end sexual misconduct and harassment in higher education: eepurl.com/gTQwPf

Our August newsletter is out!
mailchi.mp/1752group/au...

Here you'll find:
🗣️ a call for papers
👨‍💻 our recent webinar recording
📝 our new toolkit on addressing harassment & sexual misconduct experienced by PGRs
🚻 Anna Bull's response to the EHCR single-sex guidance

And more...

Off The Fence: David Cameron's Black-Tie Ball And a real buffet of archive treats, too

what an interesting story in here about a ~*Cambridge professor*~

open.substack.com/pub/thefence...

How should higher education institutions deal with harassment & sexual misconduct by 3rd parties who are not staff or students?

These cases present fewer opportunities for prevention & response.

This question is addressed in our new toolkit: ukcge.ac.uk/assets/resou...

Addressing harassment and sexual misconduct experienced by postgraduate researchers In partnership with the UK Council for Graduate Education — supported by funding from the Enhancing Research Culture fund at the University of York — we have produced a toolkit for higher…

Find more information, research, good practice examples, and resources in our toolkit.

We have workshop resources (slides, a presentation, and facilitators’ notes) for 1.5 hour workshops with PGRs and PGR supervisors available at: www.1752group.com/pgrs

Addressing harassment and sexual misconduct experienced by postgraduate researchers In partnership with the UK Council for Graduate Education — supported by funding from the Enhancing Research Culture fund at the University of York — we have produced a toolkit for higher…

Holding open conversations & agreeing an approach to sensitive boundaries b/w students & staff helps signal to the community that learning relationships take priority over other ways of relating to each other. This work is particularly effective when embedded in induction & training programmes.

Our new toolkit, 'Addressing harassment and sexual misconduct experienced by postgraduate researchers', tackles some of the hardest qu's in harassment prevention.

E.g. How to prevent abuses of power? Won't there always be those who abuse trust & authority?

Read & share!
ukcge.ac.uk/assets/resou...

If you work in #HigherEducation this toolkit is essential reading.
From 01/08/25 the OfS are adding a new condition of registration ("E6") regulating #HEIs in England on preventing and responding to harassment and sexual misconduct.

#PostGraduate researchers are particularly at risk.

#Academia

PhD students ‘may be overlooked’ in sexual harassment regulations Blurred line between staff and students could leave postgraduate researchers at greater risk

Postgraduate researchers may be overlooked by incoming sexual harassment regulations in English universities, warns @the1752group.bsky.social @ukcge.bsky.social www.timeshighereducation.com/news/phd-stu... via @julietterowsell.bsky.social